Le mercredi 2 octobre 2019 01:48:15 UTC+2, rjf a écrit :
>
> I think that if you read the paper you would not expect it to compete with
> a CAS
> except on its made-up artificial testset.
>
Could you amplify ?
> RJF
>
>
> On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 10:57:44 AM UTC-4, Martin R wrote:
>>
>
> However, someone who knows about git (i.e., not I) should report the bug
> that git allows deletion of a branch that is checked out in another
> worktree.
>
I don't see that bug. This is what happens when I try that: (* denotes the
branch on the worktree I am currently on; + denotes bran
The error is different, it is related to png.
and the error message even tells you what Homebrew package to install and how.
* The following required packages can not be built:
* png
* Try installing png with `brew
I think that if you read the paper you would not expect it to compete with
a CAS
except on its made-up artificial testset.
RJF
On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 10:57:44 AM UTC-4, Martin R wrote:
>
> Actually, I think it would be even more interesting to compare with
> FriCAS, because FriCAS has
Another build failure (seemingly at the same spot). The log file is
attached.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups
Hi, I'm trying to build the documentation for doc.sagemath.org on CoCalc.
It happens that we set some java options, and they are spit out by java
when you start it.
Building dochtml/manifolds tries to parse the java version somehow, but
that's not going to work. I have to admit, I haven't checked
Sorry, I was too quick. ./configure needs to be run as follows
CC=clang CXX=clang++ ./configure
(otherwise Homebrew's gcc will be used, and it will break...)
(we only need gfortran from Homebrew,no gcc)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:30 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> OK, apparently "brew update" did
OK, apparently "brew update" did its magic, phew...
now do
make distclean
./configure
make
should not build Sage's gcc/gfortran...
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:12 AM Ben Salisbury wrote:
> Running 'brew install gcc' works without an error.
>
> mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew instal
Running 'brew install gcc' works without an error.
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew install gcc
==> Downloading
https://homebrew.bintray.com/bottles/gcc-9.2.0_1.mojave.bottle.tar.gz
==> Downloading from
https://akamai.bintray.com/12/12951cda5ca32814387a1106fdaea9c4d4dd55e9c27f0dc7c044ab5
and what happens after
brew install gcc
?
Does it finish without an error? Does it install any gfortan* ?
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:00 AM Ben Salisbury wrote:
>
> Same error as before.
>
> mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew update
> Updated 1 tap (homebrew/core).
> ==> Updated Formulae
> d
Same error as before.
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew update
Updated 1 tap (homebrew/core).
==> Updated Formulae
django-completion
kubeseal
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew uninstall gcc
Error: No
maybe now (i.e after brew update)
brew uninstall gcc
followed by
brew install gfortran
will work?
(cause this:
$ brew uninstall gcc
Error: No such keg: /usr/local/Cellar/gcc
didn't succeed, IMHO)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:17 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> looks like our brews are diff
looks like our brews are different...
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:55 PM Ben Salisbury wrote:
>
> No such luck.
>
> mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew update
>
> Updated 1 tap (homebrew/core).
>
> No changes to formulae.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Googl
No such luck.
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew update
Updated 1 tap (homebrew/core).
No changes to formulae.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
maybe you need to run "brew update" ?
Cause, here is the formula for gfortran
https://formulae.brew.sh/cask/gfortran#default
and it works on my OSX 10.13 (I'd be very surprised if it didn't on 10,14)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:26 PM Ben Salisbury wrote:
>
> I had uninstalled and did a distclean
I had uninstalled and did a distclean before posting the last post, and
brew install gfortran still does not work.
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew uninstall gcc
Error: No such keg: /usr/local/Cellar/gcc
mth153844pe212:sage-git salis1bt$ brew install gfortran
Error: No available formula w
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 10:09 PM Ben Salisbury wrote:
>
> I've uninstalled the Homebrew install of gcc. I had posted that before
> because, upon attempting to install gfortran using Homebrew, I get
>
> Error: No available formula with the name "gfortran"
> GNU Fortran is part of the GCC formula:
I've uninstalled the Homebrew install of gcc. I had posted that before
because, upon attempting to install gfortran using Homebrew, I get
Error: No available formula with the name "gfortran"
GNU Fortran is part of the GCC formula:
brew install gcc
For completeness, in case something else is
Have you used “SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes”? it is the only way to make a somewhat
portable
binary that doesn’t have the problem you describe.
> On 1/10/2019, at 10:47 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> looks like you need to pass some flags to NTL,
> apparently it doesn't know what Core 2 CPUs are any more
looks like you need to pass some flags to NTL,
apparently it doesn't know what Core 2 CPUs are any more...
Perhaps reporting this to NTL?
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 5:35 PM Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I have compiled sage 8.9 on a KVM used as a master image for a computer lab.
> The CPU is pres
Hi
I have compiled sage 8.9 on a KVM used as a master image for a computer lab.
The CPU is presented as model name : Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge)
Imaging is using systemimager based on rsync.
On the newer lab machines with Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz
the sage copied to the
On 2019-09-28, Simon King wrote:
> I wonder what's different. I am still reluctant to do "git checkout -f
>", but perhaps that would be my best bet.
I tried, and it seemed to work.
However, someone who knows about git (i.e., not I) should report the bug
that git allows deletion of a branch that
22 matches
Mail list logo
