I think that if you read the paper you would not expect it to compete with a CAS except on its made-up artificial testset. RJF
On Monday, September 30, 2019 at 10:57:44 AM UTC-4, Martin R wrote: > > Actually, I think it would be even more interesting to compare with > FriCAS, because FriCAS has the most complete implementation of the Risch > algorithm and does not at all rely on pattern matching. > > Martin > > Am Sonntag, 29. September 2019 15:00:01 UTC+2 schrieb mmarco: >> >> I would be very interested in comparing their results with RUBI. >> >> El viernes, 27 de septiembre de 2019, 21:53:00 (UTC+2), Eric Gourgoulhon >> escribió: >>> >>> Thanks for sharing! >>> This looks very promising. I hope we have it in Sage some day. >>> >>> Eric. >>> >>> Le vendredi 27 septembre 2019 17:06:31 UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >>>> >>>> https://openreview.net/pdf?id=S1eZYeHFDS >>>> >>>> I wish they had code available... >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/8027c79d-8c10-4c88-a523-72d4ea242706%40googlegroups.com.
