[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

2017-01-11 Thread Volker Braun
Yes, to the Sage src tree. That is, we would add a newsfragments directory somewhere under $SAGE_ROOT. On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 8:15:48 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Volker, > > On 2017-01-11, Volker Braun > wrote: > > There is a somewhat painless approach to generating human-read

[sage-devel] Re: Release note auto-generation RFC

2017-01-11 Thread Simon King
Hi Volker, On 2017-01-11, Volker Braun wrote: > There is a somewhat painless approach to generating human-readable release > notes using https://github.com/hawkowl/towncrier. As far as the ticket > author is concerned, if you think that your ticket #12435 is of wider > interest and should be a

[sage-devel] Re: Fw: Request for Information on Future Needs for Advanced Cyberinfrastructure to Support Science and Engineering Research (NSF CI 2030)

2017-01-11 Thread john_perry_usm
+1 though I doubt I'd have anything to say they'd be interested in reading ;-) john perry On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 8:18:03 AM UTC-6, Ursula Whitcher wrote: > > I want to draw the Sage community's attention to this NSF call for comment > on "advanced cyberinfrastructure". Specifically,

[sage-devel] Release note auto-generation RFC

2017-01-11 Thread Volker Braun
There is a somewhat painless approach to generating human-readable release notes using https://github.com/hawkowl/towncrier. As far as the ticket author is concerned, if you think that your ticket #12435 is of wider interest and should be announced then all you'd have to do is add a file echo "

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-11 Thread Joseph Hundley
Aah. Well, some of this stuff was actually written in C++ and then rewritten in Java. It might make more sense to just look for the old C++ implementation instead. On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 3:11:36 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > >> >> It's not clear that this desire to do s

[sage-devel] Fw: Request for Information on Future Needs for Advanced Cyberinfrastructure to Support Science and Engineering Research (NSF CI 2030)

2017-01-11 Thread Whitcher, Ursula A.
I want to draw the Sage community's attention to this NSF call for comment on "advanced cyberinfrastructure". Specifically, the NSF is asking what sorts of computing resources it should prioritize. We should tell them to support open-source software in mathematics! Is anyone interested in a

[sage-devel] Workshop "Geometry and Computer Science"

2017-01-11 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Hi, This is to advertise this workshop taking place in Pescara (Italy) on 8-10 Feb, with at least three talks involving Sage: http://www.sci.unich.it/gncs2017/ Best wishes, Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe f

Re: [sage-devel] Why is patchbot testing closed tickets?

2017-01-11 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
See also https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/XrZpvbZk3j0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To

[sage-devel] Re: Why is patchbot testing closed tickets?

2017-01-11 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
Yes, there is something fishy in the way the patchbot gets the list of tickets to test. Any help is welcome. There is already a check that should avoid that, but it seems that somehow it fails. I have just added another check (belt and suspenders..), that will be in patchbot 2.6.7 Not sure th

Re: [sage-devel] group algebra modules

2017-01-11 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
> > >>> It's not clear that this desire to do something general is that well >>> grounded in practical applications. In my old java project I implemented >>> only the five simply connected exceptional groups and mostly got by just >>> fine. Still, that was the idea. I noticed that reductive Ka

[sage-devel] Re: coercions from (quadratic) NumberFields to AA

2017-01-11 Thread Travis Scrimshaw
On Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 3:03:56 AM UTC-6, Marc Mezzarobba wrote: > > Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > > If no coercion is currently known, then coerce_map_from() calls > > _coerce_map_from_(). If _coerce_map_from_() returns a map, then that > > map becomes the coercion map. If it simply returns