I just updated the project with some excel + csv files with a much more
indepth inventory.
Also, concerning ansible -- this is what I used when working on things this
summer (see https://github.com/ohanar/sagemath.org). I found that when you
use any well supported plugin, using ansible was very pl
Please try to understand, once again, that you are at CNRS in a very
> fortunate and exceptional position, and many people are much less
> lucky. Try to get a grant and manage it to see my point :-)
>
>
>
And (not speaking to Nathann or anyone else) try it when teaching a 3-3 or
4-4 load at a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:23:26AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Related question: Does the ODK grant have a hardware or computing
> budget or money that could be allocated to that? If so, how are you
> planning to use it (or is there a plan yet)? I ask only because
> we might coordinate our
On 16 September 2015 at 10:36, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Dima,
>
>> E.g. as far as I am concerned, it's thanks to ODK, which pays 50% of my
>> salary, that I can set aside time for this.
>
> You are of course welcome (and probably bound) to spend 50% of your working
> time
> on whatever is in OpenDre
Dima,
> E.g. as far as I am concerned, it's thanks to ODK, which pays 50% of my
> salary, that I can set aside time for this.
You are of course welcome (and probably bound) to spend 50% of your working
time
on whatever is in OpenDreamKit's plan.
Now, I'm sorry to say that I read Nicolas' message
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 16 September 2015 at 18:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>> Nicolas is totally correct here. E.g. as far as I am concerned, it's
>> thanks to ODK, which pays 50% of my salary, that I can set aside time
>> for this.
>>
>
>
> I work
Hi
On 16 September 2015 at 18:44, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Nicolas is totally correct here. E.g. as far as I am concerned, it's
> thanks to ODK, which pays 50% of my salary, that I can set aside time
> for this.
>
>
I work on this because of when it aligns with AIMS goals/needs (some of
which
Thought I'd share this in case anyone else blundered in the same way I just
did...
I installed 6.8 on an OS X Mavericks (10.9) system on which the
"xcode-select --install" command had not been run. I ran "sage -upgrade"
to upgrade it. I then tried to install a custom spkg, which failed in the
On 16 September 2015 at 02:40, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>> I believe this will help quite some ODK toward its aims. So, Vincent,
>> Samuel, Dima, if you feel like it, it would be natural to count some
>> of your work here as part of your ODK contribution. We need to fit this
>> into some of our delive
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A concrete first task is to add everybody on the following list to the
> sagemath-admins mailing list (by tracking down their emails), etc..
Samuel Lelievre has volunteered to do this. Thanks!
> Can one of you volunteer to do this,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:09 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>>> As far I am concerned, I don't mind if you manage your small company on
>>> another mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>> Surely you cared way more about Sage succeeding than petty issues of
>> credit!?
>>
>
>
> Just to be clear, it does seem a bit confu
As far I am concerned, I don't mind if you manage your small company on
>> another mailing list.
>>
>>
>> Surely you cared way more about Sage succeeding than petty issues of
> credit!?
>
>
Just to be clear, it does seem a bit confusing at times what discussions
are SMC Inc related and what
>> If it is "doable", then indeed it would solve my problem and (to me)
>> does not seem to induce any tricky behaviour.
>
> In this case:
>
> sage: [x.polynomial() for x in K1]
> [0, a, a^2, a + 1, a^2 + a, a^2 + a + 1, a^2 + 1, 1]
> sage: [K2(x.polynomial()) for x in K1]
> [0, b, b^2, b + 1, b^2
On 16 September 2015 at 15:52, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> In your case it is slightly more specific as it might be the case that K1
>> and K2 are constructed in the same exact way (expect for the string 'a' and
>> 'b') so we could just decide to send "a" onto "b", but I'm not sure it is
Hi
On 16 September 2015 at 16:20, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There's starting to be some initial work in
>
>
> https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/f125ea34-9817-4715-b879-e26e0c7fcb7c/files/public/
>
> Who on the list of people below has experience with managing a
> nontrivial hardware clust
Hello,
> In your case it is slightly more specific as it might be the case that K1 and
> K2 are constructed in the same exact way (expect for the string 'a' and 'b')
> so we could just decide to send "a" onto "b", but I'm not sure it is very
> helpful to define an exception in this case.
If it
Hi,
I guess one of the issue is that there is no canonical map between two
different representations of the same finite field (so no coercion).
In your case it is slightly more specific as it might be the case that K1
and K2 are constructed in the same exact way (expect for the string 'a' and
'
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can also help if needed.
Thanks! I've added you to the project and list:
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/f125ea34-9817-4715-b879-e26e0c7fcb7c/files/public/
> Maybe that would make the french admins count too high :)
Hi all,
I can also help if needed.
Maybe that would make the french admins count too high :)
Best,
JP
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 4:26:08 PM UTC+2, William wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A concrete first task is to add everybody on the following list to the
> sagemath-admins mailing list (by track
Hi,
A concrete first task is to add everybody on the following list to the
sagemath-admins mailing list (by tracking down their emails), etc..
Can one of you volunteer to do this, and once you do I'll add you and
make you an owner of that list, so you can add other people:
- William Stein
- Andre
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:55:55AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> I think the current Sage UW cluster team is:
>>
>>- William Stein
>>- Andrey Novoseltsev
>>- Dima Pasechnik
>>- Vincent Delecroix
>>- Thierry
>>- Sa
Hi,
There's starting to be some initial work in
https://cloud.sagemath.com/projects/f125ea34-9817-4715-b879-e26e0c7fcb7c/files/public/
Who on the list of people below has experience with managing a
nontrivial hardware cluster and wants to share how they do it? Jan
Groenewald, maybe you can
It may be useful to mention here that I did manage to build with my default
.bashrc in the end, so with Homebrew installed and /usr/local/ in the PATH.
The issue here, as far as I understand, is that Homebrew has an
installation option --with-default-names, which, if set, places utils in
/usr/l
http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/?machine=Ubuntu:14.04:i686:3.13.0-40-generic:arando
I get there by clicking on the machine I wanted to see.
On 16/09/15 04:26, Daniel Krenn wrote:
On 2015-09-16 09:23, Daniel Krenn wrote:
is there a report on patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket to see the tickets
William,
If you want to discuss this issue further, please send me a private email.
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr..
On Wednesday, September 16, 2015, Nathann Cohen
wrote:
> I believe this will help quite some ODK toward its aims. So, Vincent,
>> Samuel, Dima, if you feel like it, it would be natural to count some
>> of your work here as part of your ODK contribution. We need to fit this
>> into some of our del
>
> I believe this will help quite some ODK toward its aims. So, Vincent,
> Samuel, Dima, if you feel like it, it would be natural to count some
> of your work here as part of your ODK contribution. We need to fit this
> into some of our deliverables. The closest match I found for now is:
>
>D3
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:55:55AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I think the current Sage UW cluster team is:
>
>- William Stein
>- Andrey Novoseltsev
>- Dima Pasechnik
>- Vincent Delecroix
>- Thierry
>- Samuel Lelievre
>- Harald Schilly
>- Andrew Ohana (minimal av
>
> GF(4) is not a subfield of GF(8).
>
Oh. Right. Actually, the problem with my code happened when both finite
fields were equal, and I wrote this message without thinking.
sage: K1 = GF(8,'a')
sage: K2 = GF(8,'b')
sage: K2(K1(1))
TypeError: unable to coerce from a finite fiel
GF(4) is not a subfield of GF(8).
John
On 16 September 2015 at 10:16, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I am rather ignorant of Sage matters when it comes to finite fields. I have
> been playing with matrices for a while, working around a bug that I did not
> understand. It is now solv
Hello everybody,
I am rather ignorant of Sage matters when it comes to finite fields. I have
been playing with matrices for a while, working around a bug that I did not
understand. It is now solved, but here is what it boils down to:
sage: K1 = GF(4,'w')
sage: K2 = GF(8,'x')
sage: K2(
Hi William,
Please add me too.
We'd be happy to help with what we already do: buildslaves for
Debian/Ubuntu, PPA autobuild, perhaps some of this can be migrated onto
those servers. We're most comfortable working on Debian/Ubuntu with LXC.
Regards,
Jan
On 15 September 2015 at 21:22, William Stei
On 2015-09-16 09:23, Daniel Krenn wrote:
is there a report on patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket to see the tickets
done by a specific patchbot?
Managed with machine= and then not only the name but the full
uname-description.
Best
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Hi,
is there a report on patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket to see the tickets
done by a specific patchbot?
Best
Daniel
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
34 matches
Mail list logo
