[sage-devel] NameError: global name 'sage' is not defined

2014-08-15 Thread Paul Graham
Im working on ticket #16228: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16228 , and now when trying to make doctests for both Tachyon..save and Tachyon.show, i recieve an error when trying to test Tachyon.show. Ive tried different input combinations, but just right now, trying to figure out this error my

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread Thierry
Hi, On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 08:52:03AM -0700, Harald Schilly wrote: > > This should be moved to sage-flame. > > On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:42:14 AM UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby > Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > > > If not against the GPL, this certainly seems to be going against the > > *spiri

[sage-devel] cygwin64 build error for ppl-1.1

2014-08-15 Thread Sudarsan Vasista Srinivasan Ranganathan
Hi, I'm trying to install Sage on cygwin64 with the operating system being Windows 8.1. I know of the persisting issues along with remedies posted at http://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/Cygwin64Port#TestingSage5.13onWindows764bitsrunningwithinVirtualBox4.3withCygwin64 but even with the the weak.patc

Re: [sage-devel] Integer matrices using FLINT

2014-08-15 Thread William A Stein
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Marc Masdeu wrote: > Hi, > > I have just pushed a new commit that adheres to most of what has been said. > Functionality for William's implementation of some of the high-level > functions, plus for LinBox, Pari, IML, NTL and such is back. Since no-one > from the P

Re: [sage-devel] Integer matrices using FLINT

2014-08-15 Thread Marc Masdeu
Hi, I have just pushed a new commit that adheres to most of what has been said. Functionality for William's implementation of some of the high-level functions, plus for LinBox, Pari, IML, NTL and such is back. Since no-one from the Pari/GP group entered the conversation, most of the functions t

[sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread Paul Graham
Since you mention looking on Wikipedia for more info on SageMathCloud, just thought id let you know that William writes about SageMathCloud on his Sage blog at: http://sagemath.blogspot.com/ , in case you hadn’t come across it. As it has a lot of information about SMC. On Friday, August 15, 201

[sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread Harald Schilly
This should be moved to sage-flame. On Friday, August 15, 2014 10:42:14 AM UTC+2, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > > If not against the GPL, this certainly seems to be going against the > *spirit* of the Sage project. > What's the spirit of the Sage project? It's mission statem

[sage-devel] is_bistochastic accepts negative entries

2014-08-15 Thread Anne Schilling
Hi! The current implementation of is_bistochastic in sage.matrix.matrix2 allows negative inputs. For example sage: m = matrix([[-1,2],[2,-1]]) sage: m.is_bistochastic() True But a stochastic matrix should really only allow nonnegative entries. Can I open a ticket to fix this? Best, Anne -- Y

[sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread mmarco
IANAL, but my understanding is that the licensing of the code that William wrote for the servers that run SMC would only be relevant if the code is distributed. That is, the license of a software is an agreement that happens in the moment of the distribution. The license stablishes the conditio

[sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-08-15, Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd) wrote: > As I understand it, the SageMathCloud is closed source. Yet it is > making extensive use of open-source code. Maybe the closed source bits > don't link to the open-source bits, though I find it a bit hard to > believe. If it did not

[sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread kcrisman
> As I understand it, the SageMathCloud is closed source. Yet it is > making extensive use of open-source code. Maybe the closed source bits > don't link to the open-source bits, though I find it a bit hard to > believe. If it did not link, it would not that be against the GPL? Or > I guess i

[sage-devel] SageMathCloud / closed source / GPL / Spirit of Sage??

2014-08-15 Thread Dr. David Kirkby (Kirkby Microwave Ltd)
As I understand it, the SageMathCloud is closed source. Yet it is making extensive use of open-source code. Maybe the closed source bits don't link to the open-source bits, though I find it a bit hard to believe. If it did not link, it would not that be against the GPL? Or I guess if the code is no

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [PATCH] Putting some include paths in common

2014-08-15 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, August 15, 2014 8:12:40 AM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > > Trivial patches require a mail, normal patches require a ticket, big > contributions require a ticket and a branch with tidy patches -- this is > how reasonable free software projects work. PS: Somewhat negatively correlated with pro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [PATCH] Putting some include paths in common

2014-08-15 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, August 15, 2014 8:12:40 AM UTC+1, Snark wrote: > > Why did I still make the effort? Because I'm not a new contributor > If you were new to Sage then I wouldn't have minded the mailed patch, but you know git so use it ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [PATCH] Putting some include paths in common

2014-08-15 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 15/08/2014 05:33, Robert Bradshaw a écrit : On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Julien Puydt wrote: Hi, Le 12/08/2014 20:50, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : On 2014-08-12, Julien Puydt wrote: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --000505020108050907050407 Content-Type: tex