[sage-devel] Re: Buiding Sage's library in place: so close!

2014-07-04 Thread Volker Braun
On Friday, July 4, 2014 4:39:13 PM UTC-4, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > ATA LITEONIT LCT-256. No idea if it's good or not (it's infinitely > better than on my previous non SSD laptop :-) ). I would indeed have > expected to most of the sage directory is loaded in memory cache > anyway (right now,

[sage-devel] Re: Do ticket titles matter? Can I rename a ticket if I didn't open it?

2014-07-04 Thread Volker Braun
I'll take meaningful over funny any day. The title also ends up in the git history. On Friday, July 4, 2014 3:05:53 PM UTC-4, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > Hello, > > I assumed the answer is "yes" for the sake of understanding what the > ticket is about, what new features were included (as

[sage-devel] Re: Do ticket titles matter? Can I rename a ticket if I didn't open it?

2014-07-04 Thread kcrisman
So - does anyone else care about ticket titles or it is a complete >> bikeshedding and I should just go mind silently my own tickets? >> > > Changing a title (that was likely put there deliberately) without > consulting the original author is certainly unlikely to lead to desirable > behaviour

[sage-devel] Re: Do ticket titles matter? Can I rename a ticket if I didn't open it?

2014-07-04 Thread Nils Bruin
On Friday, July 4, 2014 12:05:53 PM UTC-7, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > So - does anyone else care about ticket titles or it is a complete > bikeshedding and I should just go mind silently my own tickets? > Changing a title (that was likely put there deliberately) without consulting the origina

[sage-devel] Re: Do ticket titles matter? Can I rename a ticket if I didn't open it?

2014-07-04 Thread Andrew
I think that ticket title should be meaningful. There is nothing to stop the title from being humourous as well (so you have to be clever and funny). If the title is just useless then it ain't funny. Andrew On Friday, 4 July 2014 21:05:53 UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > Hello, > > I assume

[sage-devel] Re: Getting timeouts on git trac tonight; anyone else?

2014-07-04 Thread Keith Clawson
I rebooted the trac server and it's back up now. Please let me know if you have any further issues. -Keith On Friday, July 4, 2014 2:59:52 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > Hi! > > mistral-/opt/sage/src>git trac push > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > urllib2.URLError:

[sage-devel] Re: Getting timeouts on git trac tonight; anyone else?

2014-07-04 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 11:59:47PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > mistral-/opt/sage/src>git trac push > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > urllib2.URLError: > > git push trac ...:... > ssh: connect to host trac.sagemath.org port 22: Connection timed out > > On the other hand, the trac

[sage-devel] Getting timeouts on git trac tonight; anyone else?

2014-07-04 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi! mistral-/opt/sage/src>git trac push Traceback (most recent call last): ... urllib2.URLError: git push trac ...:... ssh: connect to host trac.sagemath.org port 22: Connection timed out On the other hand, the trac server seems to be working fine through my browser. Cheers,

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding Sage's library in place: so close!

2014-07-04 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 06:54:01PM -0700, Volker Braun wrote: >I was also talking about my laptop, and it has pretty much identical >specs except 32GB ram. But then everything should still comfortably fit >into 8GB, so I don't believe that this is the reason for why your >system is

Re: [sage-devel] Call for binary on OS X 10.5

2014-07-04 Thread Francois Bissey
I have one such machine but I am on holidays. I can look into it after the 15th. François On 5/07/2014, at 0:29, kcrisman wrote: > See > http://ask.sagemath.org/question/23193/download-older-versions-of-sage-where/ > : Does anyone have access to an Intel OS X 10.5 computer that can build

[sage-devel] Do ticket titles matter? Can I rename a ticket if I didn't open it?

2014-07-04 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Hello, I assumed the answer is "yes" for the sake of understanding what the ticket is about, what new features were included (as it appears in changelogs), and for the sake of following http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html#guidelines-for-opening-tickets which state "Be precise: If f

[sage-devel] Fwd: [GAP Forum] GAP Days 2014

2014-07-04 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
This could be interesting for some of the Sage developers. -- Forwarded message -- From: Mohamed Barakat Date: 2014-07-03 17:28 GMT-04:00 Subject: [GAP Forum] GAP Days 2014 To: spp1489-...@mathematik.uni-kl.de, fo...@gap-system.org, group-pub-fo...@maths.bath.ac.uk, e...@lists.rwt

[sage-devel] Call for binary on OS X 10.5

2014-07-04 Thread kcrisman
See http://ask.sagemath.org/question/23193/download-older-versions-of-sage-where/ : Does anyone have access to an Intel OS X 10.5 computer that can build recent versions of Sage and can upload a binary to be distributed around the world? I'm not sure whether the computer in question is PPC

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Buiding Sage's library in place: so close!

2014-07-04 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 04/07/2014 09:52, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : There is one more advantage to building in a different place, although it's not exploited in Sage - the build directory does not need to be backupped. E.g. my department does not want people developing in directories which are automatically back

[sage-devel] Re: Buiding Sage's library in place: so close!

2014-07-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 2014-07-04, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Volker Braun wrote: >> On Thursday, July 3, 2014 3:31:18 PM UTC-4, William wrote: >>> >>>1. Building in place saves disk space. It saves a *lot* of disk >>> space, >> >> >> $ du -sh src/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7 >> 344M s