So, is it confirmed that the redirect will be to ask.sagemath? If so, I
will merge the changes in #186 and #187 which links the notebook to the URL
provided by Harald.
- basu.
On Wednesday, December 11, 2013 1:22:05 PM UTC+8, P Purkayastha wrote:
>
> On 12/10/2013 11:08 PM, Harald Schilly wrote
I'm getting the following error anytime I try to attach a new branch to a
ticket which previously didn't have one (in particular #12453 and #9280):
*Trac detected an internal error:*
TypeError: 'unicode' object is not callable
There was an internal error in Trac. It is recommended that you noti
I tried that now with the same results:
Found package conway_polynomials-0.4.p0 in
spkg/standard/conway_polynomials-0.4.p0.spkg
conway_polynomials-0.4.p0
Extracting package
/home/charles/mth/sage-5.13/spkg/standard/conway_polynomials-0.4.p0.s
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 07:18:00AM -0800, arcisd wrote:
> I have a problem installing the GAP3 package in sage:
>
>
> Error compiling Gap3
>
> real 0m18.381s
> user 0m17.921s
> sys 0m0.584s
>
And meromorphic functions are not stable under composition...
2013/12/19, Nils Bruin :
> On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:04:22 PM UTC-10, maldun wrote:
>>
>> What I mean is that we should only allow expressions of meromorphic
>> functions in the symbolic field, i.e. we would only allow variable
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 11:04:22 PM UTC-10, maldun wrote:
>
> What I mean is that we should only allow expressions of meromorphic
> functions in the symbolic field, i.e. we would only allow variables,
> trigonometric functions and so on.
> SR should be then a superset where everything els
Sorry my Mistake, but if you look into the text you quoted, I already
corrected it:
...
> ... The ring of analytic
> functions is an Integral domain.
...
Continous is of course not sufficient.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:12:15 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 19 December 2013 09:04,
Sorry my Mistake, but if you look into the text you quoted, I already it:
...
> that the Kronecker delta is not a continuous function. The ring of
analytic
> functions is an Integral domain.
...
Continous is of course not sufficient.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:12:15 AM UTC+1, John Crem
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:42:23 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> You could consider closing a ticket only *after* testing it on the
> buildbot (that was what I did) when it is as good as certain that it
> will actually be merged.
Yes, I've been doing both depending on how probable it s
On 2013-12-19 12:38, Volker Braun wrote:
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:35:31 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
OK, so it doesn't really mean anything in practice. If there are
problems on the buildbot, you will re-open it, right?
Yes, of course.
You could consider closing a ticket only
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 11:35:31 AM UTC, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> OK, so it doesn't really mean anything in practice. If there are
> problems on the buildbot, you will re-open it, right?
>
Yes, of course.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sa
On 2013-12-19 12:33, Volker Braun wrote:
Ticket closed means it is merged on my local "develop" branch. Which you
can find mirrored if you dig around in my own github account, since that
is where the buildbot pulls from.
OK, so it doesn't really mean anything in practice. If there are
problems o
Ticket closed means it is merged on my local "develop" branch. Which you
can find mirrored if you dig around in my own github account, since that is
where the buildbot pulls from. I hope its clear that this branch must not
be used to base your own development on.
The branch will be pushed to th
Dear devs,
Is there any problem login to the trac server? I am not able to login, I
have asked a new password and has arrived, but still cannot login.
Thanks
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and sto
This is mainly a question for Volker:
What does it mean for a ticket to be closed as "fixed"? I ask because
currently there are 20 tickets which are closed in milestone sage-6.1,
but I don't find them on master, nor develop. #14750 is an example of
this. The last commit of "develop" and of "ma
Did you do a full rebuild ("make distclean") after you fixed your initial
problems?
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 6:08:22 AM UTC, Charles Greathouse wrote:
>
> I was trying to build Sage for the first time and I ran into some errors.
> The first few I could fix (mismatched gcc/g++/gfortran ver
There is a list of optional database spkgs that haven't made it into Sage-6
because nobody wanted to pick them up at http://trac.sagemath.org/14962.
That would definitely be worthwhile to go over and fix.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 10:04:57 AM UTC, John Cremona wrote:
>
> On 18 December 20
On 18 December 2013 22:22, Volker Braun wrote:
> The "sage -i filename" only works for old-style spkgs. You can put the
> tarball in the upstream/ directory, though.
Thanks, that works: copy (or link) your local copy of the .tar.bz2
file into upstream/ and then a simple "sage -i package-name" f
I was trying to build Sage for the first time and I ran into some errors. The
first few I could fix (mismatched gcc/g++/gfortran versions) but after the
initial errors were fixed the installer seemed to be chugging along just fine.
About 3-4 hours in the process failed, though, on conway_polynom
On 19 December 2013 09:04, maldun wrote:
> The fact, that SR is not a field is interesting, the Kronecker delta example
> on the ticket shows it quite well. But the problem originates from the fact,
> that the Kronecker delta is not a continuous function. The ring of analytic
> functions is an Int
The fact, that SR is not a field is interesting, the Kronecker delta
example on the ticket shows it quite well. But the problem originates from
the fact,
that the Kronecker delta is not a continuous function. The ring of analytic
functions is an Integral domain.
Question: Should we define a subs
This isn't exactly a question of mathematical correctness, but of usability.
Think of users who aren't mathematicians, but engineers or from physics.
Most of them even don't know the difference between a polynomial from ZZ or
RR.
So the goal should be a good default behavior which covers 70-90% o
This isn't exactly a question of mathematical correctness, but of usability.
Think of users who aren't mathematicians, but engineers or from physics.
Most of them even don't know the difference between a polynomial from ZZ or
RR.
So the goal should be a good default behavior which covers 70-90% o
The fact, that SR is not a field is interesting, the Kronecker delta
example on the ticket shows it quite well. But the problem originates from
the fact,
that the Kronecker delta is not a continuous function. The ring of
continuous functions is an Integral domain.
Question: Should we define a su
The fact, that SR is not a field is interesting, the Kronecker delta
example on the ticket shows it quite well. But the problem originates from
the fact,
that the Kronecker delta is not a continuous function. The ring of
continuous functions is an Integral domain.
Question: Should we define a su
25 matches
Mail list logo
