Simon King writes:
> However, if you *are* upstream (i.e., if your data are only published in
> this form, but not as an independent project), I'd say tracking it with
> mercural is fine. But perhaps other people have a different viewpoint.
Please don't. When we merge all the SPKGs' repositories
This somehow looks close to what I reported here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/ec5afc6027106c52/879d17ec55e92aed
regarding "debug()" command in the notebook.
On Mar 20, 1:54 pm, John Cremona wrote:
> In Sage-5.8, we have a matrix M of rationals:
>
> type(M)
>
>
On Mar 21, 2013, at 2:15 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the extcode spkg lacks a SPKG.txt, and has no description in
> http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/.
>
> Looking at its content shows:
> - jsmath (why isn't it in a proper spkg?)
> - things for the notebook (why isn't it in the s
On 2013-03-21, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Mar 21, 9:05 am, Benjamin Jones wrote:
>> It seems to me that the ambiguity arises from the original statement,
>
> Systems like magma (and I assume gap as well) solve this by having a
> "GSet" type. If you have S3 acting on the GSet V={1,2,3} then, one can
>
It's basically a random place people started sticking stuff that
"didn't belong" in the main library. It'll go away with the git
refactoring.
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the extcode spkg lacks a SPKG.txt, and has no description in
> http://www.sagemath.org/packa
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:25 PM, john_perry_usm wrote:
> On Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:15:05 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Despite the overall positive tone, I have to say my favorite quote is:
>>
>> "I can not help but editorialize that installing and using SageTeX took me
>> approximately 4 ho
On 2013-03-21, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> --f46d0444e849ed15b904d871801a
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> It seems to me that the ambiguity arises from the original statement, "the
> orbit (1,2) under G", not the fact that the domain is non-homogeneous. It's
> less ambiguous to say
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:25:32 PM UTC+1, john_perry_usm wrote:
> On the other hand, perhaps he just means to say that Sage is as elegant
> and useful as Pegasus, in which case I concur wholeheartedly. :-)
>
As useful as a horse with wings? Like, you also need a roof over your
paddock? And
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:15:05 AM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Despite the overall positive tone, I have to say my favorite quote is:
>
> "I can not help but editorialize that installing and using SageTeX took me
> approximately 4 hours of hair tearing frustration — it is comparable in
> diffi
On 2013-03-21 21:15, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Looking at its content shows:
> - jsmath (why isn't it in a proper spkg?)
> - things for the notebook (why isn't it in the sagenb spkg?)
These two could probably be removed I guess.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gr
Hi,
the extcode spkg lacks a SPKG.txt, and has no description in
http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/.
Looking at its content shows:
- jsmath (why isn't it in a proper spkg?)
- things for the notebook (why isn't it in the sagenb spkg?)
- something about a mac app (shouldn't it rather go
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:40 AM, mmarco wrote:
>
>> Last time I talked to him, he suggested we use qemu to make a virtual
>> ARM machine. That's probably faster than actual
>> hardware for this purpose, and we can configure it to have way more RAM.
>
>
> Is that true? emulating an arm processor
Le 21/03/2013 19:40, mmarco a écrit :
Last time I talked to him, he suggested we use qemu to make a virtual
ARM machine. That's probably faster than actual
hardware for this purpose, and we can configure it to have way more RAM.
Is that true? emulating an arm processor is actually faster t
I have made the log file r-2.15.2.p1.log_13mar20 available via ftp.
user: sage_gro...@aardvarr.ca
password: password
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> Last time I talked to him, he suggested we use qemu to make a virtual
> ARM machine. That's probably faster than actual
> hardware for this purpose, and we can configure it to have way more RAM.
Is that true? emulating an arm processor is actually faster than the
processor itself?
Wow!
--
On Mar 20, 10:01 am, leif wrote:
> Abstraction. Although it's (currently) not foo._f nor foo.__f, I
> wouldn't say f is part of a cached function's public interface, but
> rather an implementation detail.
Fair enough. So why not make "foo.f" part of the public interface?
Python properties (and t
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 at 11:23AM -0700, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:18:04 PM UTC+1, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> > That's not *my* favorite quote. But I really don't know what I could do
> > to make using SageTeX any easier. You simply have to somehow make
> > sagetex.sty available
Le 21/03/2013 07:04, Julien Puydt a écrit :
I'll post the results of "make ptestlong" when I'll have had the time to
run it (could take a few days).
I didn't manage to run "make ptestlong" correctly : after a while, the
box get loaded like crazy and tests start to fail with timeouts. I had a
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:18:04 PM UTC+1, Dan Drake wrote:
>>
>> That's not *my* favorite quote. But I really don't know what I could do
>> to make using SageTeX any easier. You simply have to somehow make
>> sagetex.sty available to the
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 7:18:04 PM UTC+1, Dan Drake wrote:
> That's not *my* favorite quote. But I really don't know what I could do
> to make using SageTeX any easier. You simply have to somehow make
> sagetex.sty available to the TeX system and I don't think there's any
> universal, cross
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 at 06:15AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> Despite the overall positive tone, I have to say my favorite quote is:
>
> "I can not help but editorialize that installing and using SageTeX took me
> approximately 4 hours of hair tearing frustration — it is comparable in
> difficulty to
On Mar 21, 9:05 am, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> It seems to me that the ambiguity arises from the original statement,
Systems like magma (and I assume gap as well) solve this by having a
"GSet" type. If you have S3 acting on the GSet V={1,2,3} then, one can
construct the powerset W of V as a GSet as
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM, mmarco wrote:
> I can only thak you for the effort on compiling sage on ARM,
> considering that you do it in your very own small laptop.
>
> What happened with the ARM box that William said he would buy for the
> sagemath cluster?
Andrew Ohana was unfortunately un
It seems to me that the ambiguity arises from the original statement, "the
orbit (1,2) under G", not the fact that the domain is non-homogeneous. It's
less ambiguous to say directly G.{1, 2} (the orbit of the _element_ {1, 2})
versus G.1 \union G.2 (the orbit of the subset {1, 2}). Then, which grou
On Mar 21, 11:16 am, Fredrik Johansson
wrote:
> On Mar 20, 5:50 pm, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > Bill et al.,
>
> > Along these lines, I'm just curious
> > abouthttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12173upgradingFLINT in
> > Sage... Is enough of zn_poly (in particular, all of it?) to allow us t
I can only thak you for the effort on compiling sage on ARM,
considering that you do it in your very own small laptop.
What happened with the ARM box that William said he would buy for the
sagemath cluster?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel
On Mar 20, 5:50 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> Bill et al.,
>
> Along these lines, I'm just curious
> abouthttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12173upgrading FLINT in
> Sage... Is enough of zn_poly (in particular, all of it?) to allow us to
> remove that spkg? Since that code is more or less unmain
While working on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14291, it
came to my attention that one can now have permutation groups acting
on quite arbitrary domains (the only requirement for the domain elements
seems to be them being hashable).
This leads to the following kind of confusing situati
On 2013-03-21, John Cremona wrote:
> On 21 March 2013 03:25, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> On 2013-03-20, John Cremona wrote:
>>> In Sage-5.8, we have a matrix M of rationals:
>>>
>>> type(M)
>>>
>>>
>>> M.parent()
>>> Full MatrixSpace of 138 by 179 dense matrices over Rational Field
>>>
>>> but none
Starting new thread...
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 9:15:05 AM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote:
>
> I hadn't seen this before. I think it definitely belongs in the "positive
> views of Sage" category. I notice that maybe we want to reorganize
> http://sagemath.org/library.html or find ways to allow it to
I hadn't seen this before. I think it definitely belongs in the "positive
views of Sage" category. I notice that maybe we want to
reorganize http://sagemath.org/library.html or find ways to allow it to be
updated more frequently. At the very least, there are so many independent
(i.e. non-Sag
On 2013-03-21 12:22, Charles Bouillaguet wrote:
> Is this an error on my side ?
No, the patchbot should be fixed for sage-5.9.beta0 to replace -sagenb
by --sagenb.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
On 03/21/2013 02:03 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2013-03-21 04:09, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> 1. I notice that many tests (like "sage -t
>> devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py") are run three times.
> Any suspicious environment variables? What is
> $ env | grep SAGE
Here is all of env:
DOT_
Hi,
I tried to start a patchbot for 5.9beta0, and I got the following failure :
plugins.docbuild -- 11 seconds
== end plugins.docbuild ==
$SAGE_ROOT/sage -tp 3 -sagenb $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-0/doc/common
$SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-0/doc/en $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-0/doc/fr
$SAGE_ROOT/de
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:42:52 PM UTC-7, leif wrote:
Simon King wrote:
> Hi Leif,
>
> On 2013-03-20, leif > wrote:
>> We do have show(), so we could likely have play(),
>
> Why should there be a different command for showing a plot,
On 21 March 2013 03:25, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On 2013-03-20, John Cremona wrote:
>> In Sage-5.8, we have a matrix M of rationals:
>>
>> type(M)
>>
>>
>> M.parent()
>> Full MatrixSpace of 138 by 179 dense matrices over Rational Field
>>
>> but none of M.rank(), M.kernel() or even plain M work, a
On 2013-03-21 09:50, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> On 2013-03-21, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2013-03-21 03:52, Ricksme wrote:
>>> Following the recommendation within the install.log, I am reporting
>>> test failure of package r-2.15.2.p1 during installation from source of
>>> sage-5.8 on op
Hi Jeroen,
On 2013-03-21, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2013-03-21 03:52, Ricksme wrote:
>> Following the recommendation within the install.log, I am reporting
>> test failure of package r-2.15.2.p1 during installation from source of
>> sage-5.8 on opensuse 12.3 (x86_64).
>> I have attached the fina
No need to reinvent the wheel. From the console, use xdg-open to play audio
files. Leave the configuration to the desktop environment.
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:42:52 AM UTC+1, leif wrote:
>
> Well, you could of course extend show()'s capabilities (and probably
> make play() just an alias),
On 2013-03-21 04:09, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> 1. I notice that many tests (like "sage -t
> devel/sage/sage/rings/arith.py") are run three times.
Any suspicious environment variables? What is
$ env | grep SAGE
> File "devel/sage/sage/misc/interpreter.py", line 566, in
> sage.misc.interpre
40 matches
Mail list logo
