On Mar 20, 5:50 pm, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > Bill et al., > > Along these lines, I'm just curious > abouthttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12173upgrading FLINT in > Sage... Is enough of zn_poly (in particular, all of it?) to allow us to > remove that spkg? Since that code is more or less unmaintained, things > likehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/14098(now resolved) > orhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13947become somewhat > annoying. David's webpage makes it clear that upstream is now canonical > (for which I don't blame him at all, these things could be an albatross > otherwise), but if we could connect the few remaining things in Sage that > definitely depend on in to FLINT instead, that would be really nice. >
As far as I know, flint2 covers all functionality of zn_poly (though it's probably a bit slower in some cases). I don't really have an idea how much code in Sage uses zn_poly and how difficult it would be to change it, but it ought to be doable. Fredrik -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
