Hellooo !!
> I left a comment on the ticket and made myself a reviewer.
Great ! Thanks ! :-)
Nathann
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-de
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Helloo everybody !!
>
> There's a small patch I wrote aaages ago and there has been no activity
> on the ticket for the last 7 months. Would anybody here feel like giving it
> a review ? It just exposes a method from GAP and I wou
Helloo everybody !!
There's a small patch I wrote aaages ago and there has been no activity
on the ticket for the last 7 months. Would anybody here feel like giving it
a review ? It just exposes a method from GAP and I would like to have it in
order to plot some graphs..
http://trac.s
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:19:34 Timo Kluck wrote:
> Op woensdag 27 februari 2013 20:19:32 UTC+1 schreef Simon King het volgende:
> > Hi Nils,
> >
> > On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin > wrote:
> > > Do we really want to test our random number generators for
> > > deterministic behaviour? If so, the test shou
Op woensdag 27 februari 2013 20:19:32 UTC+1 schreef Simon King het volgende:
>
> Hi Nils,
>
> On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin > wrote:
>
> > Do we really want to test our random number generators for
> > deterministic behaviour? If so, the test should probably at least set
> > the seed prior to testi
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 11:44:09 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2013-02-27 22:45, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> > But if I do:
> > {{{
> > echo "1" | time
> QuadraticSieve.exe
> > }}}
> > I get
> > {{{
> > bash: time : commande introuva
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:22:30 François Bissey wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:46 Pong wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the hint. So what would be a possible remedy for that?
>
> I am sorry, I don't have one from the top of my head. I may have to open a
> ticket for it and cc Volker who mai
On 2013-02-27 22:45, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> But if I do:
> {{{
> echo "1" | time QuadraticSieve.exe
> }}}
> I get
> {{{
> bash: time : commande introuvable
> }}}
...which has nothing to do with Cygwin.
On my Gentoo Linux system:
cat /dev/null | time cat
By the way, the real command is available in
http://cygwin.com/packages/time/
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:59:55 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Ok, that's because usually there are both a bash builtin and a real
> command.
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/106331
>
> On W
Ok, that's because usually there are both a bash builtin and a real command.
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.cygwin/106331
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:45:21 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> But if I do:
> {{{
> echo "1" | time QuadraticSieve.
But if I do:
{{{
echo "1" | time QuadraticSieve.exe
}}}
I get
{{{
bash: time : commande introuvable
}}}
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:28:41 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Same result on another system.
>
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:10:4
On Feb 27, 12:06 pm, Simon King wrote:
> On 2013-02-27, mmarco wrote:
>
> > Isn't the result supposed to be over the rationals? Or am i missing
> > something?
>
> And:
>
> sage: S.category()
> Category of sets
The __init__ is not calling super().__init__ (or whatever the
appropriate spelling
Same result on another system.
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:10:45 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> $ time true
>
> real0m0.000s
> user0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.000s
>
> $ type time
> time est un mot-clé du shell
>
> $ /bin/sh -c "time true"
>
> real0m0.138s
> user0m0.000s
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 13:14:46 Pong wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the hint. So what would be a possible remedy for that?
>
I am sorry, I don't have one from the top of my head. I may have to open a
ticket for it and cc Volker who maintains the ppl spkg because that's not an
easy problem to fix.
Hi,
Thanks for the hint. So what would be a possible remedy for that?
Pong
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:27:06 PM UTC-8, François wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:22:49 Wai Yan Pong wrote:
> > I have problems with package ppl-0.11.2.p1 in upgrading to SAGE 5.7 this
> > morning.
> >
$ time true
real0m0.000s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
$ type time
time est un mot-clé du shell
$ /bin/sh -c "time true"
real0m0.138s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
$ bash -c "time true"
real0m0.001s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
$ which time
which: no time in
(/usr/l
There has been a lot of work done (mainly by Robert Bradshaw, David Roe,
and me) to completely replace the Sage doctesting framework. I feel that
this is now ready for review. Technically speaking, I started as
reviewer but I have a "reviewer patch" 180KB in size. So you can
imagine, this is quite
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:22:49 Wai Yan Pong wrote:
> I have problems with package ppl-0.11.2.p1 in upgrading to SAGE 5.7 this
> morning.
>
> I attached both the head and the tail of the log file.
>
> The copy of SAGE is on a machine running Arch Linux.
>
> uname -a
> Linux Arch-T 3.7.9-2-ARCH #1 S
On 2013-02-27, mmarco wrote:
> Isn't the result supposed to be over the rationals? Or am i missing
> something?
And:
sage: S.category()
Category of sets
Isn't this supposed to be in the category of schemes over the rationals?
Cheers,
Simon
--
You received this message because you are sub
I have found the following behaviour:
sage: A=AffineSpace(QQ,1)
sage: B=ProjectiveSpace(QQ,2)
sage: h1=A.hom([x,0,1],B)
sage: h2=A.hom([1,0,x],B)
sage: S=h1.glue_along_domains(h2)
sage: S
Scheme obtained by gluing X and Y along U, where
X: Projective Space of dimension 2 over Rational Field
Y
I have problems with package ppl-0.11.2.p1 in upgrading to SAGE 5.7 this
morning.
I attached both the head and the tail of the log file.
The copy of SAGE is on a machine running Arch Linux.
uname -a
Linux Arch-T 3.7.9-2-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Feb 25 12:04:25 CET 2013
x86_64 GNU/Linux
with gcc
Hi Nils,
On 2013-02-27, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Feb 27, 9:39 am, Timo Kluck wrote:
>> The issue is that we're upgrading boost, and apparently, its random number
>> generator has slightly changed. Therefore, we have some failing doctests
>> for random_set.
>
> Do we really want to test our random
On Feb 27, 9:39 am, Timo Kluck wrote:
> The issue is that we're upgrading boost, and apparently, its random number
> generator has slightly changed. Therefore, we have some failing doctests
> for random_set.
Do we really want to test our random number generators for
deterministic behaviour? If so
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:26:13 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:24:36 AM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>While reviewing #14130, there was a multiline array* environment
>> inside of a .. MATH::, and this ended up build
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:24:36 AM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>While reviewing #14130, there was a multiline array* environment inside
> of a .. MATH::, and this ended up building just fine as html, but did not
> compile in pdf form. For example, suppose you ha
Hi there,
I'm looking for someone who's familiar with Polybori to have a quick look
at the following ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13767
The issue is that we're upgrading boost, and apparently, its random number
generator has slightly changed. Therefore, we have some failing
>
>
>
>> graphs/graph_decompositions/vertex_separation.pyx:151:
>> \begin{alignat}{2}
>>
>
> This one seems to work (I presume it compiles in the pdf doc okay),
> although the html does quite like the \intertext...
>
> Here's the full doc for reference:
>
> .. MATH::
> :nowrap:
>
>
luisfe wrote:
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ time true
real0m0.000s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ type time
time es una palabra clave del shell
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ /bin/sh -c "time true"
real0m0.000s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
user@frink /o
Try asking Bosman directly; I don't know if he reads this list.
John
On 27 February 2013 15:23, Peng wrote:
> Dear John Cremona,
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> For n=45000 or smaller, it works well and gives an output. Then the next
> number I tried is 5 and this gave an Error.
>
> In sage 5.
Hey,
Is this conceivably because align is in the amsmath package and we
> (perhaps) don't include packages in the pdf building?
>
I don't know if we use many such environments elsewhere in the doc. How
> do these examples look in the pdf (if they are even in the reference
> manual)?
>
>
sa
Thanks for tracking this down, Travis.
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:24:36 AM UTC-5, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>While reviewing #14130, there was a multiline array* environment inside
> of a .. MATH::, and this ended up building just fine as html, but did not
> compile i
On Monday, February 25, 2013 10:56:31 AM UTC-5, projetmbc wrote:
>
> Please, don't be so agressive.
>
>
>
Indeed.
So, it turns out the problem is that a really long answer gets cut off (no
doubt this occurs elsewhere as well). Does anyone have any idea whether
this is some flag we can set tha
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 12:23:11 AM UTC-8, JMH wrote:
>
> I do know I can solve the problem for me if I modify my private
> "~/.sage/sagerc" file.
> However, I intend to create a "spkg" for that "package" and advertise the
> usage of sage among people who use that "package" now (especia
Hey everyone,
While reviewing #14130, there was a multiline array* environment inside
of a .. MATH::, and this ended up building just fine as html, but did not
compile in pdf form. For example, suppose you have:
.. MATH::
\begin{align*}
f(x) & = x^2 - 2 \\
g(x) & = \frac{f(x) - x
Dear John Cremona,
Thanks for your reply.
For n=45000 or smaller, it works well and gives an output. Then the next
number I tried is 5 and this gave an Error.
In sage 5.7, this doesn't work neither.
I even don't know yet why this happens exactly.
PS:
I'm trying to compute the modular Galo
On 2013-02-27 10:25, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> One issue raised on the Trac ticket: smalljac is 64 bits only
It's worse, it's actually x86_64 only (from what I understand on the
ticket).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscr
I cannot think of a reason for computing Heilbronn matrices of such
large index, so you have one? And how does it perform for smaller n,
say 1000, 1, 2, ...?
Lastly, Sage-5.7 has been released so you should upgrade (but I am not
saying if any relevant code has changed between 5.4.1 and 5.
Dear all,
I've tried to compute Heilbronn Matrices for n=5 in sage 5.4.1, but the
following Error comes out when I run
* sage: H=HeilbronnMerel(5)*
*RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last)*
*/home/guest
Dear all,
I've tried to compute Heilbronn Matrices for n=5 in sage 5.4.1, but the
following Error comes out when I run
* sage: H=HeilbronnMerel(5)*
*RuntimeError Traceback (most recent call last)*
*/home/guest
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:07:31 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> I for one would really like smalljac to be in Sage.
>>
> +1
>
> And with PARI 2.6.0 coming, well also have fast point counting for elliptic
> curve in small
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ time true
real0m0.000s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ type time
time es una palabra clave del shell
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ /bin/sh -c "time true"
real0m0.000s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
user@frink /opt/sage/sage
$ b
Hi Volker,
On 2013-02-27, Volker Braun wrote:
> The output of "sage -startuptime" only lists the 50 slowest modules, not
> all.
OK. But *with* the patch, sage.plot.graphics is the 6th slowest module,
and much much slower than _ssl, for example---but _ssl is among the 50
slowest modules *without
Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
If you have a Cygwin:
please tell me the output of the following shell commands:
$ time true
$ type time
$ /bin/sh -c "time true"
$ bash -c "time true"
FWIW, 'time' is (also) a bash built-in function.
-leif
--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail
I can tell you this evening.
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:19:43 AM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> If you have a Cygwin:
>
> please tell me the output of the following shell commands:
>
> $ time true
> $ type time
> $ /bin/sh -c "time true"
> $ bash -c "time true"
>
--
You received
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:07:31 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I for one would really like smalljac to be in Sage.
>
> +1
And with PARI 2.6.0 coming, well also have fast point counting for elliptic
curve in small characteristic.
One issue raised on the Trac ticket: smalljac is 64
If you have a Cygwin:
please tell me the output of the following shell commands:
$ time true
$ type time
$ /bin/sh -c "time true"
$ bash -c "time true"
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei
I for one would really like smalljac to be in Sage.
For your general question, have you read all that the developer's
guide has to say on how to make new spkgs?
John
On 27 February 2013 06:45, Pavel Panchekha wrote:
> smalljac is a library developed under Andrew Sutherland to do computations
>
I do know I can solve the problem for me if I modify my private
"~/.sage/sagerc" file.
However, I intend to create a "spkg" for that "package" and advertise the
usage of sage among people who use that "package" now (especially these who
use it with python now).
I can tell them they simply need t
First of all, the "sage -startuptime" and the patchbot startuptime module
are totally independent.
The output of "sage -startuptime" only lists the 50 slowest modules, not
all. There is also a certain amount of luck in its output for individual
modules, e.g. whether or not the globals() hash t
On Feb 26, 11:32 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The patchbot's startup_time plugin complains about #14159. In order to
> see what is happening, I studied the output of sage -startuptime, and
> got a surprise.
I don't think the list printed is complete. It seems to be just a top
50. It probably m
50 matches
Mail list logo
