An example that triggers the bug is:
roots = mod(-1, 4489).nth_root(2, all=True)
Note 4489=67^2 and 67^2 is the first prime >62.
Following the hint given in the printed error, I changed the print mode
near line 1168 of rings/finite_rings/integer_mod.pyx from 'digits' to
'bars'. This fixes the
Ivan Andrus writes:
> On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> So, summarizing, I have no strong feelings in the spke vs easy_install
> thing, but if having it as an optional spkg makes someone's
I have done a new version of the gap_packages spkg, adding some new
packages. In particular i have added automata, cohomolo, crisp, fga,
fplsa, gbnp, kbmag and quagroup. The reason why i have chosen those is
that they are the ones that are listed as accepted in the gap site,
are under the GPL or LG
Please contact me if you have this power - we have a user we need to ban,
and I'm sure in the future this could happen again. You'd think I had
enough karma to do this by now...
- kcrisman
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Hi,
I'm working on a presentation that will include some current/planned
capabilities of web-based python environments via sage and ipython
notebooks. The idea is to try to get some people thinking about what
can be done from open web-based frameworks as opposed to monolithic
and closed C++ GUI's
On 6/26/12 12:49 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
I'm getting a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable from sagenb.org right
now (Tuesday, 11:00 am Seattle time). Can someone restart it?
It looked like it was restarting already; I'll restart it.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@
I'm getting a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable from sagenb.org right
now (Tuesday, 11:00 am Seattle time). Can someone restart it?
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
---
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Jun 26, 2012, at 3:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
> So, summarizing, I have no strong feelings in the spke vs easy_install thing,
> but if having it as an optional spkg makes someone's life easier, my vote is
> just go for it.
>
On 6/26/12 8:37 AM, kcrisman wrote:
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:59:55 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2012-06-26 13:46, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> At least 0.9.0, as it should fix a number of issues present in
the old
> one. It is also annoying creating interacts in the n
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 9:29:06 AM UTC-4, jason wrote:
>
> On 6/26/12 8:23 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > BS3 is same license as Python, BS4 is MIT so I didn't want to have to
> > pretend to be a lawyer
>
> On this reason: MIT license [1] is perfectly fine for inclusion in Sage.
>
>
Ok, great. We
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:59:55 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-06-26 13:46, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> > At least 0.9.0, as it should fix a number of issues present in the old
> > one. It is also annoying creating interacts in the notebook and then
> > discover that something w
On 6/26/12 8:23 AM, kcrisman wrote:
BS3 is same license as Python, BS4 is MIT so I didn't want to have to
pretend to be a lawyer
On this reason: MIT license [1] is perfectly fine for inclusion in Sage.
Thanks,
Jason
[1] http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php,
http://www.gnu.org/
On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 5:58:12 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> I am all for having data-scrapping tools easily available, but is there
> any actual advantage on having an spkg rahter than using easy_install, or
> is it just for the convenience of the sws2rst conversion?
>
> That being
On 2012-06-26 13:46, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> At least 0.9.0, as it should fix a number of issues present in the old
> one. It is also annoying creating interacts in the notebook and then
> discover that something works differently with Sage cell server. As I
> understand it, differences should
At least 0.9.0, as it should fix a number of issues present in the old
one. It is also annoying creating interacts in the notebook and then
discover that something works differently with Sage cell server. As I
understand it, differences should be reduced by the switch.
Having a beta version with e
I am all for having data-scrapping tools easily available, but is there any
actual advantage on having an spkg rahter than using easy_install, or is it
just for the convenience of the sws2rst conversion?
That being said, why make the spkg with BS3 rather than BS4? I believe BS4
breaks some back
On 2012-06-26 10:54, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> Hi Jeroen,
>
> I also would like to have Sage with new notebook ready by the start of
> the next term (a bit in advance for testing and setting up) - is it
> possible perhaps to make 5.2 just for the notebook switch?..
Are you talking about sagenb-0
Hi Jeroen,
I also would like to have Sage with new notebook ready by the start of
the next term (a bit in advance for testing and setting up) - is it
possible perhaps to make 5.2 just for the notebook switch?..
Thank you,
Andrey
On Jun 25, 10:01 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-06-25 20:54,
This would be interesting also to have an iterator for [all] elements of
unbounded height,
in number rings and fields.
See my post regarding the broken iterator on ZZ^n (and the independently
broken iterator
on isomorphic free abelian groups).
--David
--
To post to this group, send an email
1. For free abelian groups, the iterator doesn't enumerate any elements.
sage: A = AbelianGroup(3)
sage: A
Multiplicative Abelian Group isomorphic to Z x Z x Z
sage: for a in A:
: print a
:
The bug is in A.__iter__:
invs = self.invariants()
for t in mrange(invs):
20 matches
Mail list logo
