On Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:59:55 AM UTC-4, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2012-06-26 13:46, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > At least 0.9.0, as it should fix a number of issues present in the old > > one. It is also annoying creating interacts in the notebook and then > > discover that something works differently with Sage cell server. As I > > understand it, differences should be reduced by the switch. > Hmm, I would actually prefer to wait for sage-0.10.0, i.e. not release > the final sage-5.2 with sage-0.9.0. >
I agree with Andrey and Jason that having a "non-beta" release ready for sysadmins to install for mid-August term begin dates is essential. I'm looking forward to the new Sagenb. Even with 0.9.0 would be better, in my view. In fact, I think it would be totally appropriate to have a Sage 5.2 that was ONLY the new notebook and ancillaries, released relatively quickly, maybe even in conjunction with Sage 5.3 or whatever - Jason, is sagenb.org running sagenb 0.10 yet? - so that it would indeed be ready by then. 5.3 could just start with whatever seemed appropriate. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
