[sage-devel] Re: no trac email notification

2012-02-25 Thread Dima Pasechnik
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote: > Some days ago I postet in thread "trac attachment notification", see > [1], that I don't get mails when a ticket I participated in was > changed. I posted there, since I thought there was a connection to an > attachment. > > Now I opened a new tick

[sage-devel] Build of GMP-ECM fails for sage 4.8 (on a buildbot node)

2012-02-25 Thread Jonathan Hanke
Hi, I was trying to build sage-4.8 on a Sun Fire 4450 server ( parsley.math.uga.edu) running Redhat linux and I'm having some issues. It appears to fail when building GMP-ECM, but I'm a little confused because this machine is included in the automated buildbot testing framework. I have included

Re: [sage-devel] Google PageRank and related methods for Graphs in Sage

2012-02-25 Thread Jorge Catumba Ruiz
I've checked the NetworkX library and I found that PageRank is already programmed. So I will program the other methods since these aren't very popular, but are important. > > Thanks. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an e

Re: [sage-devel] Google PageRank and related methods for Graphs in Sage

2012-02-25 Thread Jorge Catumba Ruiz
Thanks William, I will check that. My principal interest is in the other three methods since that are important in the study of Complex Networks. We use the PageRank in order to make a comparison with the other methods. Greetings -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup

Re: [sage-devel] Google PageRank and related methods for Graphs in Sage

2012-02-25 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jorge Catumba Ruiz wrote: > Hi, > > I'm considering to implement the Google PageRank and related methods for > Graphs in Sage. Those methods are "MICMAC" method of Michael Godet, "PWP" > method of Rafael Díaz and "Heat Kernel" method of Fang Chung. What do you > th

[sage-devel] $CC in sage/atlas packages

2012-02-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
I've been cleaning up this old ticket, http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/2999 because most of the issues are either fixed or being worked on independently. I don't know anything about {atlas,sage}.spkg though. Does anyone know if the ticket is still valid for them? -- To post to th

[sage-devel] Google PageRank and related methods for Graphs in Sage

2012-02-25 Thread Jorge Catumba Ruiz
Hi, I'm considering to implement the Google PageRank and related methods for Graphs in Sage. Those methods are "MICMAC" method of Michael Godet, "PWP" method of Rafael Díaz and "Heat Kernel" method of Fang Chung. What do you think about this? Thanks in advance, Jorge Catumba -- To post to t

[sage-devel] Re: Help with simple C++/Cython Example

2012-02-25 Thread Volker Braun
By a dubious design decision, OSX has case-insensitive filenames. So the auto-generated Rectangle.cpp clobbers the rectangle.cpp file. This should be considered to be a OSX bug, really. On Saturday, February 25, 2012 2:12:49 PM UTC-8, jonh...@gmail.com wrote: > > Any comments are appreciated.

[sage-devel] Help with simple C++/Cython Example

2012-02-25 Thread Jonathan Hanke
Hi, I was trying to get the C++ cython example described in the docs ( http://docs.cython.org/src/userguide/wrapping_CPlusPlus.html) to build in Sage 4.8, but I'm getting some errors I don't understand. I created a separate development branch called "sage-c_extensions", added extension lines

Re: [sage-devel] Building a deb for sage on Debian/Ubuntu

2012-02-25 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi As an aside, can I get a hold of the scripts that build the binaries available for download on sagemath.org and mirrors (for Ubuntu LTS only). As a first step to getting packaging skills and having a deb for people to install, I could try make a virtual debian package that contains the sage pre

Re: [sage-devel] Building a deb for sage on Debian/Ubuntu

2012-02-25 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On 25 February 2012 21:33, Francois Bissey wrote: > Hi Jan, > > we'll need a bit more of your output, especially if you ran parallel make. > If you could link to the whole maxima build log (in skpg/log) that would > be most useful. > > The maxima bild logs: http://users.aims.ac.za/~jan/maxim

Re: [sage-devel] Compilation failure of pari (ARM, gcc 4.6.2)

2012-02-25 Thread Julien Puydt
Le samedi 04 février, Julien Puydt a écrit: > I'll try to investigate where the problem is (pari? gcc? other?), but > I thought sharing early would raise good suggestions. Well, the problem was in the gcc version used for precise on ARM, which has been updated since : I just compiled 5.0beta5 on m

Re: [sage-devel] Building a deb for sage on Debian/Ubuntu

2012-02-25 Thread Francois Bissey
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:02:46 Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > I am looking for a Debian or Ubuntu packaging mentor. > > I am not an experienced debian packager, I am learning everything from > scratch. > But I am an experienced system administrator. > > I am hoping to find a mentor familiar with b

[sage-devel] Building a deb for sage on Debian/Ubuntu

2012-02-25 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi I am looking for a Debian or Ubuntu packaging mentor. I am not an experienced debian packager, I am learning everything from scratch. But I am an experienced system administrator. I am hoping to find a mentor familiar with both Debian/Ubuntu and sage to assist me. I am trying to build a deb

Re: [sage-devel] Cannot compile sage

2012-02-25 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Mike Zabrocki wrote: > I've never been able to compile sage for some reason and I always gave The reason is surely "cruft" in /usr/local. How about if you rename /usr/local to /usr/local.orig, do a clean build, then report what happens? After your build finish

[sage-devel] Cannot compile sage

2012-02-25 Thread Mike Zabrocki
I've never been able to compile sage for some reason and I always gave up instead of following the instructions to report the error. OK, here goes I am currently trying to compile sage-4.8 I am using MacOS X 10.5.8 with Dev Tools 3.1.3 (the latest that seems to be compatible with OSX 10.5)

Re: [sage-devel] review when one patchbot says TestFailed and the others say TestPassed

2012-02-25 Thread David Roe
If the errors on the normal patchbot were all something like "Killed," you can go ahead and give a positive review. The processes running tests in the patchbot are killed sometimes and we don't understand exactly why David On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:28, Daniel Krenn wrote: > I'm currently r

Re: [sage-devel] review when one patchbot says TestFailed and the others say TestPassed

2012-02-25 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Daniel Krenn wrote: > I'm currently reviewing tickets #5491 and #12471. In both tickets the > patchbot for 4.8 (linux/ubuntu/hardy/sage.math.washington.edu) failed, > whereas the other two patchbots (one also for 4.8 and one for > 5.0.beta3) passed the test, see [

[sage-devel] review when one patchbot says TestFailed and the others say TestPassed

2012-02-25 Thread Daniel Krenn
I'm currently reviewing tickets #5491 and #12471. In both tickets the patchbot for 4.8 (linux/ubuntu/hardy/sage.math.washington.edu) failed, whereas the other two patchbots (one also for 4.8 and one for 5.0.beta3) passed the test, see [1] and [2]. The tests on my computer also passed. How do I pro