On Feb 4, 8:25 pm, mmarco wrote:
> I have been working on a VM with compressed filesystems. I have
> thought that maybe a good aproach to the "automatic generation"
> problem would be to mount the sage directory from a compressed file in
> a shared folder. It should need, as William sugested, a wi
Wait, so the ticket owner field actually means something? (I take it this
is what you mean by saying that Nathann hasn't responded to the bug when
the only place I see him on the ticket is in the ticket owner field.) I
remember being told that it is meaningless now and we should CC someone if
w
Hi Simon,
it also fails with Sage 5.0.beta2 on Debian x86_64, with the same symptoms.
So it's not Suse-specific, it seems.
$ uname -a
Linux arando 3.1.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Tue Jan 10 05:01:58 UTC 2012 x86_64
GNU/Linux
gcc version 4.6.2 (Debian 4.6.2-11)
Best,
Dima
Error compiling Cython file:
---
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:05 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2012 5:12 AM, "Nathann Cohen" wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody !!!
>>
>> I wondered why we still had .py files in our library. Some time ago
>> this made sense as there were Python features that were not available
>> in Cython -- li
On Sunday, 5 February 2012 09:20:37 UTC+8, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> > You have to admit that it is a bit harsh to describe these patches as
> > "hard to understand" and "full of dodgy hacks". Or at the very very
> > least that it is not out of lazyness from my part :-p
>
> Given the speed of your
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> Note that what is broken[1] here is ARM's libc, if one types
> "gamma(6.0)" one gets "120." on all systems. It's a
> question about gamma(float(6.0)) which is explicitly requesting the
> (presuma
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:13 AM, rjf wrote:
>
>
> > If there is a reasonable
> > implementation that can guarantee this behavior with no loss in speed and
> > no other significant trade-offs, then library designers should use it,
> but
> > I don't think that it is such a simple issue.
>
> I think
Hi Jim,
On 4 Feb., 17:27, Jim Milgram wrote:
> Using openSUSE 12.1. Sage compliled without difficulty, but
> the compilation of the optional program "p_group_cohomolgy" failed.
> Here are final lines from the log record.
> ...
> pGroupCohomology/cochain.pyx:1037:33: local variable 'singular' ref
> You have to admit that it is a bit harsh to describe these patches as
> "hard to understand" and "full of dodgy hacks". Or at the very very
> least that it is not out of lazyness from my part :-p
Given the speed of your uploading patches to any graph or LP code when
tickets appear, I hardly thi
> And it's not only your time, it's other's time that is being used (if not,
> hmm, wasted) to look for bugs that are so commonplace
> in C code.
Please Dima, do not look at my patches if you can not stand their
clumsiness. I do not pay anybody to review them, and so no one should
feel forced to d
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 8:17 AM, rjf wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 1:16 pm, Julien Puydt wrote:
>> Le 02/02/2012 23:22, Jonathan Bober a crit :
>>
>> > Can you think of a reason that the answer should change? Does maxima use
>> > less that 53 bits of precision ever?
>>
>> Well, if I don't err, $10^{17}$ h
On 2/4/12 3:51 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
Hi,
The Google Groups interface is really terrible IMHO (especially since it
doesn't allow you to write plain text emails anymore), so I've been
looking into using a newsreader to access sage-devel. Gmane_ is a
website which archives public mailing lists, es
Hi,
The Google Groups interface is really terrible IMHO (especially since it
doesn't allow you to write plain text emails anymore), so I've been looking
into using a newsreader to access sage-devel. Gmane_ is a website which
archives public mailing lists, especially those related to free softwa
Out of curiosity, is anyone actively working on a suncc port. (I ask
since libcsage's SConstruct needs changing, and there is some stuff in
there pertaining to such a port.)
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:55, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
> I've started working on a clang port, and it looks like it may be
>
I have been working on a VM with compressed filesystems. I have
thought that maybe a good aproach to the "automatic generation"
problem would be to mount the sage directory from a compressed file in
a shared folder. It should need, as William sugested, a windows GUI
app that would take care of conf
I've started working on a clang port, and it looks like it may be
doable. I have created a fairly barebones metaticket for it [1] which
lists the spkgs that I have found issues with thus far.
I have successfully built and tested sage-5.0.beta1 on sage.math using
clang for all but the following spk
Le 04/02/2012 10:18, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade a écrit :
2012/2/4 Julien Puydt:
(sage subshell) hecke:Olinux-armv7l jpuydt$ make
gcc -c -O3 -Wall -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -g
-funroll-loops -fPIC -I. -I../src/headers
-I/home/jpuydt/sage-4.8/local/include -o mp.o mp.c
OK, this is now #12438!
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12438
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
On 2/4/12 12:50 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:30 am, Jason Grout wrote:
I was thinking of confusion for the user, because the user has to be
more careful about how they call the function because the arguments
change. Now, this can be alleviated by the user using keyword
arguments
Just corroborating.
I encountered the same problem this week installing sage for the first
time on a laptop running 10.6.8.
I had no problem installing on a imac running 10.6.8 that already had
an older copy of sage.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsub
On Feb 4, 11:30 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> I was thinking of confusion for the user, because the user has to be
> more careful about how they call the function because the arguments
> change. Now, this can be alleviated by the user using keyword
> arguments, or paying attention and being aware of
On 2/4/12 12:26 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
On Feb 4, 11:21 am, Jason Grout wrote:
On 2/4/12 11:24 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:43:44 PM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
But in definite integrals the variable of integration is a dummy one
and does n
On Feb 4, 11:21 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 2/4/12 11:24 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:43:44 PM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> > But in definite integrals the variable of integration is a dummy one
> > and does not exist out of the integral!
>
> > +1
On 2/4/12 11:24 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:43:44 PM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
But in definite integrals the variable of integration is a dummy one
and does not exist out of the integral!
+1. This behavior makes no sense to me.
So what happens in a
Le 04/02/2012 17:21, rjf a écrit :
On Feb 2, 1:29 pm, Julien Puydt wrote:
+1 A user asking for a floating-point computation means (s)he is ready
to accept the results are mathematically wrong, but computationally
within a reasonable error range.
There are lots of reasonable expectations. Lik
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 11:43:44 PM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> But in definite integrals the variable of integration is a dummy one
> and does not exist out of the integral!
+1. This behavior makes no sense to me.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To
Using openSUSE 12.1. Sage compliled without difficulty, but
the compilation of the optional program "p_group_cohomolgy" failed.
Here are final lines from the log record.
I hope someone can help with this.
Please let me know if you need any further information.
Yours,
Jim Milgram
gcc -pthrea
On Feb 3, 7:53 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 2 February 2012 23:05, rjf wrote:
>
>
>
> > I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
> > something
> > wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer (perhaps
> > in float format) when it is
> > given an integer a
On Feb 2, 1:29 pm, Julien Puydt wrote:
>
>
> +1 A user asking for a floating-point computation means (s)he is ready
> to accept the results are mathematically wrong, but computationally
> within a reasonable error range.
>
There are lots of reasonable expectations. Like the answer will be
the
On Feb 2, 1:16 pm, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 02/02/2012 23:22, Jonathan Bober a crit :
>
> > Can you think of a reason that the answer should change? Does maxima use
> > less that 53 bits of precision ever?
>
> Well, if I don't err, $10^{17}$ has 18 decimal digits, which is more
> than the 15,95.
On Feb 2, 5:28 pm, Jonathan Bober wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:05 PM, rjf wrote:
>
> > I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
> > something
> > wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer (perhaps
> > in float format) when it is
> > given an integ
On Feb 4, 4:31 am, P Purkayastha wrote:
> On Saturday, February 4, 2012 6:10:07 AM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > It is a known bug? Or maybe not considered a bug at all? Quick search
> > does not show anything related...
>
> > sage: f(x) = x
> > sage: f
> > x |--> x
> > sage:
On 2012-02-04 16:27, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 04/02/2012 16:16, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>> I added a script testcflag.sh in the spirit of testcc.sh which simply
>> tests whether the C compiler supports a certain command-line flag. This
>> is useful for writing more portable spkg-install scripts.
Le 04/02/2012 16:16, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
I added a script testcflag.sh in the spirit of testcc.sh which simply
tests whether the C compiler supports a certain command-line flag. This
is useful for writing more portable spkg-install scripts. Use case:
#12368 (ratpoints).
Please review
http
*bump*
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
I added a script testcflag.sh in the spirit of testcc.sh which simply
tests whether the C compiler supports a certain command-line flag. This
is useful for writing more portable spkg-install scripts. Use case:
#12368 (ratpoints).
Please review
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12367
--
At #12366, I have slightly patched the mpfr spkg to delete the
previously-installed libraries *after* the build but *before* the
install of the new libraries. This is a prerequisite of a gcc spkg.
Please review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12366
--
To post to this group, send an e
Le 04/02/2012 09:37, Julien Puydt a écrit :
And indeed, pari doesn't compile!
After I compile mp.c with only the -O switch, pari and the rest of sage
compiled correctly.
Snark on #sagemath
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 7:04:32 AM UTC+8, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> This might be a different problem. Shouldn't this give a syntax
> error, folks?
>
> sage: h(x,y) = x+y
> sage: h(3)
> y + 3
>
> ??? I thought the whole *point* of the h(x,y) notation was to specify
> the order - but the
On Saturday, February 4, 2012 6:10:07 AM UTC+8, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It is a known bug? Or maybe not considered a bug at all? Quick search
> does not show anything related...
>
> sage: f(x) = x
> sage: f
> x |--> x
> sage: integral(f, x)
> x |--> 1/2*x^2
> sage: integr
On Saturday, 4 February 2012 17:38:00 UTC+8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> On 02/ 4/12 05:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, 4 February 2012 11:53:35 UTC+8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2 February 2012 23:05, rjf<> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I don't know about ari
I noticed this on the Gnu Scientific Library (GSL) mailing list.
Brain seemed a very nice man. I once pointed out to him that some closed-source
code was using the GSL. He suggested to the developer that he use some other
code, and gave me a copy of the GSL book as a thank-you.
I also had no
On 02/ 4/12 05:00 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
On Saturday, 4 February 2012 11:53:35 UTC+8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 2 February 2012 23:05, rjf<> wrote:
I don't know about arithmetic on ARM specifically, but there is
something
wrong with a gamma() function that fails to return an integer
http://urchin.earth.li/~twic/Ulrich_Drepper_Is_A_.html
On Saturday, 4 February 2012 16:18:35 UTC+8, Snark wrote:
>
> Le 04/02/2012 06:00, Dima Pasechnik a �crit :
> > It's well-known how to compute gamma() better than it is implemented in
> > (e)glibc, the prevalent Linux libc implementation,
>
2012/2/4 Julien Puydt :
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my AC100 to (a snapshot of the forthcoming) ubuntu precise,
> thinking it woud perhaps raise new issues, and that would be interesting to
> detect them beforehand.
>
> And indeed, pari doesn't compile!
>
> One of the files gives an assembler file which d
Hi,
I upgraded my AC100 to (a snapshot of the forthcoming) ubuntu precise,
thinking it woud perhaps raise new issues, and that would be interesting
to detect them beforehand.
And indeed, pari doesn't compile!
One of the files gives an assembler file which doesn't compile, but the
problem is
I agree of course that we should converse in a civil manner.
On Friday, February 3, 2012 10:39:45 PM UTC-8, Jonathan Bober wrote:
>
> In general, person X might use nonstandard GNU extension Y for many
> reasons,
>
In my experience, it usually boils down to
5) Person used language extension wi
Le 04/02/2012 06:00, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
It's well-known how to compute gamma() better than it is implemented in
(e)glibc, the prevalent Linux libc implementation,
which computes exp(lgamma()) rather than gamma() directly.
See e.g.
http://oai.cwi.nl/oai/asset/10080/10080A.pdf
Perhaps I sho
Le 04/02/2012 07:39, Jonathan Bober a écrit :
For another example: I recently tried to compile some of my own code using
clang++ and discovered that I am not allowed to do
void f(int j) {
complex x[j];
[...]
}
even though g++ accepts that. ( See
http://clang.llvm.org/compatibility.htm
49 matches
Mail list logo
