On Jan 3, 2012 4:28 PM, "Julien Puydt" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I finished today the compilation of sage 4.8.alpha5 on my little ARM box.
>
> Three problems occurred:
> (1) flint, but ticket #10328 has a solution ;
> (2) R-readline -- I'm running ubuntu, so it hurts ;
> (3) singular, but ticket #12110 h
On Jan 3, 2012 6:02 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2012 05:53 PM, Simon King wrote:
>>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> On 3 Jan., 23:39, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>>>
>>> This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests:
>>>
>>>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439
>
On 01/03/2012 10:23 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
By this logic, no bugs should be fixed, because they aren't covered in
the warranty... this isn't a healthy attitude.
You take me too seriously =)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, s
Hi,
I made a test sage-5.0.prealpha0 image for Intel x64 system. It owns
the following functions:
a) Sage-5-prealaph0
b) Imagemagick-6.7.2
c) matplotlib-gui enabled (with _tkagg backend)
e) ffmpeg-0.8.4
f) firefox nightly build 12a1
g) jre-1.6u29
based on slackware live linux, porteus with Linux
By this logic, no bugs should be fixed, because they aren't covered in
the warranty... this isn't a healthy attitude.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439
>
I've got a patch and a doctest ready for #6442[1], but the doctests are
crashing thanks to these:
ERROR: An unexpected error occurred while tokenizing input
The following traceback may be corrupted or invalid
The error message is: ('EOF in multi-line statement', (1731, 0))
...
The last
On 01/03/2012 05:53 PM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 3 Jan., 23:39, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439
Am I being insensitive, or should it be marked invalid? I don't think
develop
Hi Michael,
On 3 Jan., 23:39, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439
>
> Am I being insensitive, or should it be marked invalid? I don't think
> developer typos are covered by the warranty
This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439
Am I being insensitive, or should it be marked invalid? I don't think
developer typos are covered by the warranty.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg
Hi,
I finished today the compilation of sage 4.8.alpha5 on my little ARM box.
Three problems occurred:
(1) flint, but ticket #10328 has a solution ;
(2) R-readline -- I'm running ubuntu, so it hurts ;
(3) singular, but ticket #12110 has a solution.
Of course, (2) makes the resulting sage broken
> Of course, having some enthusiasm helps :) but the important part is
> to get people to take a look.
>
> Please seehttp://wiki.sagemath.org/jmms2012, and in
> particularhttp://wiki.sagemath.org/jmms2012#boothsignupfor some of the details
> and signup. We'll be across for the booth for WeBWorK,
Can I ask people "in the know" to look at #11970, which deals with
fixing readline/R such that R properly detects readline. This issue
causes Sage to fail to build on some configurations of Ubuntu 11.10.
This issue has been made a 4.8 blocker.
Please have a look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_t
12 matches
Mail list logo
