On Jan 3, 2012 6:02 PM, "Michael Orlitzky" <mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: > > On 01/03/2012 05:53 PM, Simon King wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> On 3 Jan., 23:39, Michael Orlitzky<mich...@orlitzky.com> wrote: >>> >>> This is an old ticket to catch misspellings of 'sage:' in doctests: >>> >>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6439 >>> >>> Am I being insensitive, or should it be marked invalid? I don't think >>> developer typos are covered by the warranty. >> >> >> If you read the ticket description, you'll find that misspelling >> "sage:" in one line of a doctest means that this line will in fact not >> be tested. That is a bug and must be fixed. The ticket is clearly >> valid, I'd say. >> > > Sure, I read it -- I gave a few reasons in the comments why I don't think it matters in practice. >
I agree with you Michael, though he expressed himself unclearly. The tickets was not about fixing doctests anywhere in sage (which your email strongly suggested!) but about adding arbitrary checks to the doctest framework. William -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
