Hi, all,
When I run, say, 4.6, I get this printout prior to the sage banner:
Detected SAGE64 flag
Building Sage on OS X in 64-bit mode
Is this necessary? There's no build underway, and I imagine that it could be
disconcerting to someone who is not comfortable with the development aspects of
S
On 12/29/10 11:09 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Whatever we use here for matrices, I'd like to do the same thing for
vectors over CDF (see related post from a few minutes ago).
"conjugate_transpose" is a bit odd for vectors, since Sage carries no
notion of vectors being rows or columns. And it wouldn't
Whatever we use here for matrices, I'd like to do the same thing for
vectors over CDF (see related post from a few minutes ago).
"conjugate_transpose" is a bit odd for vectors, since Sage carries no
notion of vectors being rows or columns. And it wouldn't make sense
to me to use .adjoint() on a ve
I'd like to improve the current state of the linear algebra code over
CDF (and by extension, over RDF). The purpose would be to make Sage
more usable for teaching various topics involving matrices with
complex entries and orthogonal vectors (thus introducing square
roots). You can actually do qui
Hi Robert,
On 29 Dez., 20:04, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Simon King wrote:
> > ...
> > sage: G = SymmetricGroup(5)
> > sage: C = Groupoid(G)
> > sage: G.random_element() in C.hom_category()
> > False
>
> > Shouldn't the last line return "True"?
>
> Hmm... Grou
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 28 Dez., 23:41, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> > According to your post, it should be "A group action G x S rightarrow
>> > S is a functor from G (considered as a category) to the category of
>> > Morphisms of Sets", and in the
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I just noticed that my patch from #10296 (ready for review, improving
> the communication with singular via pexpect) had bit rotted.
>
> Of course, the patchbot knew that the old patch did not apply to the
> current Sage version. Could
Thanks, Robert. I'll dig deeper.
On Dec 28, 11:24 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> > sage: A=matrix(QQ,2,range(4))
> > sage: B=matrix(ZZ,2,range(4))
> > sage: C=A.echelon_form()
> > sage: D=B.echelon_form()
> > sage: C.is_mutable()
> > True
> > s
Hi!
I just noticed that my patch from #10296 (ready for review, improving
the communication with singular via pexpect) had bit rotted.
Of course, the patchbot knew that the old patch did not apply to the
current Sage version. Could the patchbot be modified à la "nagbot" and
inform the author of
On Dec 20, 2010, at 8:18 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Dec 20, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> On 12/20/10 10:19 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
With the semester over, I'll have some time and I thought I'd work on
a few improvements
Install your distribution's lzo and lzo-devel packages.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
Hello:
We just got an error compiling sage (we tried versions 4.5.3 and 4.6)
in opensuse 11.3 32 bits. We took care of the readline problem that
other people reported recently, just in case, but even though all
reports regarding compile problems with suse 11 end up in a successful
compile, it d
Running ./sage --upgrade
without a parameter nuked the version (4.6.1.aplha3) I had, as it
started updating 4.6 instead
I suppose this is a bug...
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubsc
Running ./sage --upgrade
without a parameter nuked the version (4.6.1.aplha3) I had, as it
started updating 4.6 instead
I suppose this is a bug...
Dima
On Dec 27, 2:54 pm, leif wrote:
> Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> > On Dec 26, 2010, at 21:01 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> >> On Dec 24, 2:42
14 matches
Mail list logo
