I'm looking to clean-up and add some options to the computations of
matrix kernels. Which prompts a design question. Simplified
somewhat, the current state of the code seems a mix of:
1. Have a single high-level method for all matrices, which delegates
to helper functions in specialized classes
So, maybe some background I should have included somewhere along the
way. I'm adding significant amounts of Sage code to my open source
linear algebra textbook and am working hard to make the linear algebra
code more welcoming to beginners (and thanks to those who have been
helping).
The confusio
to install Atlas well, you should switch to "performance" CPU mode.
"On demand" might produce inconsistent timings during the tuning
stage.
http://math-atlas.sourceforge.net/atlas_install/atlas_install.html#SECTION00032000
On Dec 18, 6:07 am, "Alexey U. Gudchenko" wrote:
> Sorry for m
Sorry for my English,
I carried out some experiments, used the system reinstalation to excuse.
Configuration:
Ubuntu 10.10 with 2.6.35-23 kernel
2 GB of memory
AMD Athlon II X2 245
Processor clock frequency is on the "On demand" mode
$ cd /home/goodok/ta/sage-4.6
$ ./make
On about 0:43
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function
> (which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the
> "adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the
> deprecation. That would begin the process t
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Adam Voss wrote:
> I noticed in run_notebook.py that when the notebook is run with
> reset=True, there is a check against min_password_length from
> sagenb.misc.misc to make sure the password is long enough. If it is
> shorter than the minimum, sage prints "That p
I've been meaning to make a service for OS X which does this sort of thing. Of
course it's OS X only, but it would be system wide instead of just in a browser.
-Ivan
On Dec 20, 2010, at 4:25 PM, RegB wrote:
> Yes, in a browser, most likely Firefox.
> "Unprepared document" could be anything any
putting this off-list discussion back on the list :)
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Niles wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> I have a short bug report, which I didn't want to overload the sage-
>> devel list with:
>>
>> The patches for ticket
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> On 12/20/10 10:19 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>>> With the semester over, I'll have some time and I thought I'd work on
>>> a few improvements to the Mac app. I have some improvements that I
>
On Dec 20, 2010, at 5:48 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/20/10 10:19 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> With the semester over, I'll have some time and I thought I'd work on
>> a few improvements to the Mac app. I have some improvements that I
>> would like to make, but I would very much like to know what
On 12/20/10 10:19 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
With the semester over, I'll have some time and I thought I'd work on
a few improvements to the Mac app. I have some improvements that I
would like to make, but I would very much like to know what others
think would be good/important to have. No suggesti
On 12/20/10 10:06 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
What do you think: should I just go ahead, and create a ticket to get
dot2tex as an optional package?
That would be great.
By the way: would you be willing to review it?
Yes, and now I have time too since the semester is over!
Thanks,
Jaso
With the semester over, I'll have some time and I thought I'd work on a few
improvements to the Mac app. I have some improvements that I would like to
make, but I would very much like to know what others think would be
good/important to have. No suggestion is too big or too small.
-Ivan
--
Hi Jason!
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 11:18:22AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> What is the status of the dot2tex spkg?
Thanks for your prompting! Progress was stalled due to:
- Lack of answers to the call for votes
- Heavy teaching semester for me (it just ended!)
> * I see a vote for it he
I noticed in run_notebook.py that when the notebook is run with
reset=True, there is a check against min_password_length from
sagenb.misc.misc to make sure the password is long enough. If it is
shorter than the minimum, sage prints "That password is way too short.
Enter a password with at least 6
Yes, in a browser, most likely Firefox.
"Unprepared document" could be anything anywhere, including
a displayed .pdf file (within a browser tab).
The file that it is in shouldn't matter, it is just highlighted text
and I think once it is highlighted it is in the (OS's) clipboard.
I am not sure if i
On Dec 2, 5:45 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> Perhaps this is something we could change when Sage 5.0 is released.
> People can expect more compatibility issues when using a major
> upgrade.
Would it be proper then to open a trac ticket with a patch against the
5.0 milestone, or just wait and see onc
On 12/19/10 7:09 AM, RegB wrote:
That appears to be very similar to what (I believe) I am thinking of.
The difference is that I am wish-dreaming a plug-in for Firefox, which
more of us use more generally more of the time than TeXMacs.
I am imagining the situation where we come across an expressio
Hi!
Maybe some of will find this tool also useful:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.heslin/Software/Emacs/Easymacs/index.php
I personally love the emacs, but I never liked the positioning of the
shortcuts... and since the emacs is afaik the only editor which
supports sage, this could also very useful for
That would of course violate the rule that spkgs must install without
internet connection...
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at htt
20 matches
Mail list logo
