putting this off-list discussion back on the list :) On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Robert Bradshaw <rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Niles <nil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >> I have a short bug report, which I didn't want to overload the sage- >> devel list with: >> >> The patches for ticket 10052 >> >> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10052 >> >> depend on two other tickets: #9370 and #8589. Patchbot is picking up >> the dependencies correctly, as reflected in the "depends on" field, >> but the build log shows that only the first is being applied before >> applying the patches from the ticket, and this results in a failure. >> Presumably this is an easy fix, but I haven't looked at what's causing >> the bug since maybe you already know now. > > That's because the latter is marked as being closed. (It doesn't yet > have a mechanism for knowing when it was closed).
Ah; a tricky situation I guess. > >> By the way, is there a trac ticket or some other place where focused >> discussion on the patchbot is taking place? > > No, just on sage-devel, which is probably the most appropriate forum. ok :) > > I'm hoping to have some time to clean this up and get it into Sage > soon. I'm also hoping that the next release will actually pass the > sage0 and startup tests, so we can actually have all tests passing on > most tickets. that sounds GREAT!! > Is anyone else working on these? I don't know . . . if so, hopefully they will let us know . . . -Niles > > - Robert > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
