Hi!
The history of #8972:
Opened 7 months ago
It was merged into sage-4.4.4.alpha0 by Mike Hansen 6 months ago, the
resolution set to "fixed". But the patch was immediately backed out by
Mike Hansen, because (apparently in combination with other patches) it
created doctest failures.
However, th
I will give at least a small demo of my Sage package for the abelian
sandpile model in the session on "Laplacian growth":
http://www.ams.org/meetings/national/jmm/2125_program_mipgroab.html#title
--Dave
On Nov 29, 5:53 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> (Posted primarily to sage-edu, cc:ed to sage-devel):
>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Being able to test a single spkg on the most recent alpha/beta/rc
> would be very useful and not produce much load. I take it that this in
> not possible right now, but could probably be done easily.
>
> I find the current spkg review process
(Posted primarily to sage-edu, cc:ed to sage-devel):
Once again the Joint Meetings have a fair amount of Sage activity in
the talks. This year, there are three I found in a very cursory
search:
http://www.ams.org/temp/mtgs-2125-1067-z1-1926.pdf (Don Krug, from the
summer PREP workshop, talking a
Hi,
Thanks Rob and Reg. Turns out that I was missing texlive-latex-extra.
LaTeX cells render fine now with these packages installed:
$ dpkg -l|grep texlive|grep ^ii|awk '{print $2}'|sort
texlive-base
texlive-binaries
texlive-common
texlive-doc-base
texlive-extra-utils
texlive-fonts-extra
texlive-
Being able to test a single spkg on the most recent alpha/beta/rc
would be very useful and not produce much load. I take it that this in
not possible right now, but could probably be done easily.
I find the current spkg review process is essentially a catch-22:
nobody wants to give a positive revi
On Nov 29, 2:24 pm, Niles wrote:
> On Nov 29, 9:11 am, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me how to make just part of the pdf reference manual,
> > specifically the part from a single .py file?
>
> I'd like to know how to do this too, and also how to produce the html
> version!
This will
On 29 November 2010 13:09, Volker Braun wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I would be interested in using the buildbot occasionally, but I don't
> know how to start a new build. Did you document the necessary steps
> somewhere?
>
> Best wishes,
> Volker
I did not set the buildbot up, so have not documented it
On 29 November 2010 14:27, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2010-11-29 13:59, David Kirkby wrote:
>> The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
>> seems to get very little use.
> Let me answer this from a release manager point-of-view.
>
> Currently, the buildbot is essentially
On Nov 29, 9:11 am, John Cremona wrote:
> Can anyone tell me how to make just part of the pdf reference manual,
> specifically the part from a single .py file?
I'd like to know how to do this too, and also how to produce the html
version!
-Niles
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-
This is now Trac 10355:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10355
I've uploaded a patch which simply deletes the definition of
__contains__ for multivariate polynomials, thus falling back to the
definition from Parent. Unfortunately, this causes some doctest
failures in schemes/generic/tor
On Nov 29, 9:07 am, Simon King wrote:
> > sage: PolynomialRing(QQ,'a').gen() in PolynomialRing(QQ,'a,b')
> > True
>
> Yes. But note that there must be a pushout of the parents:
> sage: QQ['c','a']('a')==ZZ['b','a','d']('a')
> is false, will be false, and should be false.
agreed.
> > "UNIQUE
On 2010-11-29 13:59, David Kirkby wrote:
> The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
> seems to get very little use. I know the Wireshark projects runs their
> buildbots 24/7. Any failures are emailed to the developers, along with
> a list of who has committed source since
Can anyone tell me how to make just part of the pdf reference manual,
specifically the part from a single .py file?
The intention is to do this for two specific files and include the
result as an appendix to a PhD thesis (about to be submitted by one of
my students).
I know that I can take the fu
Hi Niles,
On 29 Nov., 14:22, Niles wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers. If I'm understanding correctly, everyone is
> in favor of using the default containment inherited from Parent;
I, for one, am.
> so
> that we would have
>
> sage: 3 in PolynomialRing(QQ,'a,b')
> True
>
> sage: PolynomialRing(
Thanks for the pointers. If I'm understanding correctly, everyone is
in favor of using the default containment inherited from Parent; so
that we would have
sage: 3 in PolynomialRing(QQ,'a,b')
True
sage: PolynomialRing(QQ,'a').gen() in PolynomialRing(QQ,'a,b')
True
(currently both return False)
Hi Dave,
I would be interested in using the buildbot occasionally, but I don't
know how to start a new build. Did you document the necessary steps
somewhere?
Best wishes,
Volker
On Nov 29, 1:59 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
> seem
The addition of the buildbot to Sage should be a good thing. But it
seems to get very little use. I know the Wireshark projects runs their
buildbots 24/7. Any failures are emailed to the developers, along with
a list of who has committed source since the last successful build. I
appreciate that its
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 01:09, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > While working on testing command line options to sage (#10300,
> > positive_review), I had a look at SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-sage and
> > found many things which could
On Nov 28, 2010, at 7:51 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> While working on testing command line options to sage (#10300,
> positive_review), I had a look at SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-sage and
> found many things which could be improved. There is now a patch at
> #10326 (needs_review).
>
> advantages are obvious, e.g. one will be able to get, say, all the
> known to DB regular graphs on 15 vertices of degree 6 and diameter
> 2...
> That's a standard DB query then. Now one would have to browse the
> source to answer this, it seems...
Well, my question about a large number of method
21 matches
Mail list logo
