2010/3/14 Rado :
> Hello,
>
> I have the following simple http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/files/escher.py
> code in pure Python (using the python image library) that produces
> Droste effect pictures like this one
> http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/files/spiral.jpg
> . I wrote the code over 2 y
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Gonzalo,
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I am willing to help with this effort
> as I definitely need this capability. Part of the challenge will be
> figuring out how to do this on Windows.
Not necessarily. I think signals(2) is pa
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 13, 2010, at 4:04 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>> What are the options for supporting this (either the
>> decorator/function attribute or the with-clause)?
>
> We can support both. We could support custom signal handlers via something
> no_signals? signals_disabled? This would give something like:
>
>with no_signals:
>...
>
>with signals_disabled:
>...
>
>
The current names in Sage of _sig_on/_sig_off are a bit confusing and the
names no_signals or signals_disabled carry forward that confu
Gonzalo,
Thanks for starting this discussion. I am willing to help with this effort
as I definitely need this capability. Part of the challenge will be
figuring out how to do this on Windows.
Eventually, I think we do want to capability to be built into Cython. But,
while we experiment with di
On Mar 12, 4:22 am, Joal Heagney wrote:
> Hi guys and gals,
> Currently I'm attempting to fit the following data to the general
> logistic model:
>
> [(0,0),(1,0),(2,13),(3,28),(4,48),(5,89),(6,107),(7,168),(8,188),(9,209)]
>
> The form of the logistic curve I am using is:
>
> K/(1 + a*exp(r * (t
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
1) I closed your ticket as a dup of
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8455
#8455 is to update MPIR, not Open MPI.
Woops -- this is what i get for checking email during a talk.
I'll let you off!
Mike Hanson ha
Hello,
I have the following simple http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/files/escher.py
code in pure Python (using the python image library) that produces
Droste effect pictures like this one
http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/files/spiral.jpg
. I wrote the code over 2 years ago in java. Recently, I
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I tried to build the optional Open MPI package (version 1.1.4) on Solaris
>>> and it fails. The version in Sage is 1.1.4, which was released on
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
I tried to build the optional Open MPI package (version 1.1.4) on Solaris
and it fails. The version in Sage is 1.1.4, which was released on Jan 30,
2007, so is more than 3 years old.
The optional package is very diff
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I tried to build the optional Open MPI package (version 1.1.4) on Solaris
> and it fails. The version in Sage is 1.1.4, which was released on Jan 30,
> 2007, so is more than 3 years old.
>
> The optional package is very different to most o
I am trying to code loglog and semilog plot tools, however I cannot
find the place to manipulate the ticklabels.
sage.plot.list_plot is my template. Where are the tick labels set in
list_plot?
I want to change the tick labels from [1 ,2,3] to [1e1,1e2,1e3]
without altering the plot.
Cheers
Sco
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I tried to install some optional packages and immediately hit a snag due
to a GNUism, where 'grep' is called with the '-o' option. John Palmieri
thought the -o was unneeded, and that is indeed the case. If someone
wants to review that patch (only removal of two character
I tried to build the optional Open MPI package (version 1.1.4) on Solaris and it
fails. The version in Sage is 1.1.4, which was released on Jan 30, 2007, so is
more than 3 years old.
The optional package is very different to most other spkg files.
* No SPKG.txt
* No Mercurial repository
* S
On Mar 13, 6:14 pm, Dan Drake wrote
> That sounds like a nice project, and I think it's a good idea. My
> impression, however, is that the SoC selection committee doesn't like
> projects that come across as "too mathy".
I've been hearing the same from other people; currently I'm looking
into alte
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 04:22:09PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> There's also the question of naming--sig_on probably isn't the
> clearest name.
no_signals? signals_disabled? This would give something like:
with no_signals:
...
with signals_disabled:
...
On 14 March 2010 19:15, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 14, 11:04 am, John Cremona wrote:
>> When quitting Sage from the command line one sees something like this:
>>
>> Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.04s, Wall time 0m0.63s).
>>
>> Note "SAGE" and not "Sage". I went through and changed the small
>>
On Mar 14, 11:04 am, John Cremona wrote:
> When quitting Sage from the command line one sees something like this:
>
> Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.04s, Wall time 0m0.63s).
>
> Note "SAGE" and not "Sage". I went through and changed the small
> number of places where "SAGE" is ever output. (I skippe
When quitting Sage from the command line one sees something like this:
Exiting SAGE (CPU time 0m0.04s, Wall time 0m0.63s).
Note "SAGE" and not "Sage". I went through and changed the small
number of places where "SAGE" is ever output. (I skipped comments, of
which there are a lot, and obviously
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tim Abbott wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2010, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
>> > However, they did say that given the circumstances, it might be possible
>> > to push through a major update to the package to Karmic when once one is
>> > available.
>> >
>> > So I think this leave
I've put a patch up for http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8495
that fixes the regressions while keeping the new functionality:
sage -t -optional "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/mathematica.py"
[7.0 s]
--
All tests pa
> That review process is what killed the Debian sagemath package
> -- Upgrading during the review process
> sends you to the back of the queue, and by a year after my original
> submission, I had left MIT graduate school to start a startup, and I no
> longer had the time to upgrade past a year of S
22 matches
Mail list logo
