On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody !!!
>
> I have a working version of the Coin package which enables me to use
> the CPLEX through Sage (this package contains code that makes
> interfacing Sage and Cplex much easier). This is great for me, and I
> would now l
Hello everybody !!!
I have a working version of the Coin package which enables me to use
the CPLEX through Sage (this package contains code that makes
interfacing Sage and Cplex much easier). This is great for me, and I
would now like to send the corresponding patch, but this work by
adding option
Hi,
I just checked slashdot, and Sage is getting mentioned a few times in
the discussion about this thing that just popped up:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/01/30/2355206/7-of-the-Best-Free-Linux-Calculators?art_pos=4
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Universi
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Jan 30, 1:35 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> On Jan 29, 8:46 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> > it shows, by the way, that idea to use set() (or Set()) to remedy
>> > differences in docstrings with
>> > the output of randomised procedures
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Starting to build Sage, then finding the python builds, but finds to find
> the hashlib module is a bit irritating. There is is a specific test for this
> in spkg-install.
>
>
> -
> # Make sure sufficient crypto su
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:59:02AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>> Pushed by an example of Sébastien, I just worked a bit further to make
>> matrix groups use categories. In particular:
>>
>> sage: G = GL(2,GF(3))
>> sage:
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote:
...
>>> http://math.byu.edu/~gvol/files/fluidium_app-0.1.spkg
>>>
>>
>> This doesn't work either (imac, 10.6.2).
>
> Hmm. It worked for me.
>
> It wasn't the same problem was it? Perhaps ther
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 12:59:02AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Pushed by an example of Sébastien, I just worked a bit further to make
> matrix groups use categories. In particular:
>
> sage: G = GL(2,GF(3))
> sage: G.category()
> Category of finite groups
> sage: G.ca
On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:17 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>> The person making the spkg made it incorrectly.
>>> Put the relevant sources in a directory of the form
>>>
>>> package_n
I've installed the GNU coreutils on 't2' at:
/usr/local/coreutils-8.4/
mainly so we can get the GNU version of the 'cp' command, as that should allow
'./sage -bdist to work.'.
/usr/local/coreutils-8.4/bin/cp
A longer term solution would be to sort out bdist so it is more portable, but
for
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:16:18 -0800 (PST), Dr David Kirkby
wrote:
A new gcc was released a couple of weeks ago. There are two reports on
sage-support of people who have built sage before, but find after
upgrading gcc to the latest version, the build fa
Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:16:18 -0800 (PST), Dr David Kirkby
wrote:
A new gcc was released a couple of weeks ago. There are two reports on
sage-support of people who have built sage before, but find after
upgrading gcc to the latest version, the build fails.
I am confused. C
Hello,
There are currently 144 tickets that need review:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/10
I think this might be nearly the most behind we have ever been.So
if you want to review a ticket to help out the Sage project today,
please do.
William
--
William Stein
Associate
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:16:18 -0800 (PST), Dr David Kirkby
wrote:
> A new gcc was released a couple of weeks ago. There are two reports on
> sage-support of people who have built sage before, but find after
> upgrading gcc to the latest version, the build fails.
I am confused. Can you point to t
A new gcc was released a couple of weeks ago. There are two reports on
sage-support of people who have built sage before, but find after
upgrading gcc to the latest version, the build fails.
Has anyone else had this problem? Does Sage build at all with the
latest gcc?
Dave
--
To post to this
Hi David,
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
> Given you have already created a 4.3.0.1 release,
> which works, should this not have been called 4.3.0.2.alpha0 ? The
> fact this is an alpha implies it is going backwards.
To borrow a phrase by Homer Simpson [1]: D'oh! Sorr
On Jan 30, 7:43 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha0 successfully builds on
> t2.math. This alpha release is based on Sage 4.3 and merged tickets in
> the following order:
>
> #6425, #6772, #7799, #7775, #7772, #6595
>
> Unfortunately, I wasn't able
Hi c++ experts,
My C++ is a little bit rusty, so I'll ask here.
Building matplotlib, pynac, scipy and scipysandbox fail in the end with
/usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.11/4.4.2/../../../../include/c++/4.4.2/bits/char_traits.h:
In static member function ‘static int std::char_trai
Hi folks,
I happy to announce that Sage 4.3.0.1.alpha0 successfully builds on
t2.math. This alpha release is based on Sage 4.3 and merged tickets in
the following order:
#6425, #6772, #7799, #7775, #7772, #6595
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to produce a binary distribution using
the command "sage
Has anyone tried to compile all that is compileable for sage on llv,
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> Building Sage on HP-UX is just going to cause an immense amount of
>> grief for a whole load of Sage developers. Why force hundreds of
>> people to work to support a substandard compiler on a system no one is
>> ever going to use Sage on,
On Jan 30, 2010, at 7:50 AM, akasaka...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm using sagemath now for about 6 month at ubuntu linux and i would
like to make a suggestion. Because sagemath has so many dependencies
to all the other math-packages I think it is not practicable to create
debian packages. I just c
I posted a solution to the Trac ticket (7608) that is somewhat
different. The solution I posted probably isn't ideal, but it works.
I'd love to figure out a cleaner one.
The real trouble wasn't in determining between Graphs and DiGraphs,
but rather it was around multiedges or not. For instance, ne
Building Sage on HP-UX is just going to cause an immense amount of
grief for a whole load of Sage developers. Why force hundreds of
people to work to support a substandard compiler on a system no one is
ever going to use Sage on, just so you can catch a few hidden bugs,
when we have hundreds of re
I'm using sagemath now for about 6 month at ubuntu linux and i would
like to make a suggestion. Because sagemath has so many dependencies
to all the other math-packages I think it is not practicable to create
debian packages. I just compiled everything into /usr/loca/sage-x.y.z
folder as everybody
I found another Ultrasparc2 which is set up correctly (same linux),
and the MPIR C++ tests pass no problems. So this confirms my belief
that gcc54 was just set up wrongly.
I'm going to close the longstanding ticket we have open for that, and
I'll just build on the other machine I have found, in fu
I've just added a patch for this one! Perhaps you could review?
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7889
thanks!
Oscar
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
On Jan 30, 12:24 pm, Bill Hart wrote:
> If you don't believe me, find me even a single library which has a
> make check that uses libtool wrappers for the test programs that
> passes make check on Solaris 64 bit on t2.
Wait, that should have said:
If you don't believe me, find me even a single
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:09:24AM -0800, Nick Alexander wrote:
> Hmm. I am uneasy about having a mode force settings that are really
> user configurable, but there is an argument to be made for ensuring
> the sage conventions are default.
Yup; since anyway we do enforce this convention, it's jus
Dear Greg, dear Franco,
Short summary for the Sage-Combinat devs:
Greg is upgrading networkx to 1.0 in Sage, and this is causing some
unpickling issues for dynkin diagrams, crystals, posets, ...
Short of any good solution, I think we do not have (yet) any important
pickle of crystals or
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:58 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
...
>>
>> The person making the spkg made it incorrectly.
>> Put the relevant sources in a directory of the form
>>
>> package_name-version_number
>>
>> then type
>>
>> sage -p
Hi David,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Minh, that link is now broken.
See this link:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/sage-src/sage-4.3.0.1/sage-4.3.0.1.tar
> Can we detail the fact Sage now builds on Solaris (SPARC) at
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/
>
2010/1/30 Dr. David Kirkby :
> BTW, a 64-bit build of mpir 1.3.0 on an HP-C3600, running HP-UX 11.11B,
> results in the results shown below. This is with a PA-RISC processor - I do
> not have access to any of the newer Itanium machines.
>
> This is really good news, as an HP-UX port of Sage seems
If you don't want to change LD_LIBRARY_PATH, change LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64
as I explained.
It's this simple:
1) GCC NEEDS** complicated binaries to link against libgcc
(read the supplied references online or google it yourself)
2) Thus the linker NEEDS*** the path to the 64 bit libgc
Sorry, I pressed send before sanitising. I didn't intend to post the
expletives. Apologies for any offence.
I am just a bit frustrated at the moment, probably for reasons that
have nothing to do with this conversation, sorry.
Bill.
2010/1/30 Bill Hart :
> 2010/1/30 Dr. David Kirkby :
>> Bill Har
2010/1/30 Dr. David Kirkby :
> Bill Hart wrote:
>>
>> Cause of what David? MPIR 1.3.0 works absolutely fine on t2 if you set
>> the library paths correctly.
>
> I'm not convinced it should be necessary to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like that.
> It is not with other 64-bit applications. But I may be mistak
Bill Hart wrote:
Cause of what David? MPIR 1.3.0 works absolutely fine on t2 if you set
the library paths correctly.
I'm not convinced it should be necessary to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like that. It is
not with other 64-bit applications. But I may be mistaken
BTW, a 64-bit build of mpir 1.3.0 on
Cause of what David? MPIR 1.3.0 works absolutely fine on t2 if you set
the library paths correctly.
On Jan 30, 3:28 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 30 January 2010 01:03, François Bissey wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Bill,
> > It is a bit more subtle than that, it should work most of the time. The main
>
François Bissey wrote:
On Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:28:04 David Kirkby wrote:
I will however test this out later today (within the next 12 hours) on
the Sun Blade 2000 I own. That will at least enable us to determine if
it is the hardening in Solaris on SPARC which is causing this. The
fact this has b
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 1:52 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
Quite a few spkg-install are a simply: python setup.py install.
They fail on Open Solaris x64 if CFLAGS does not include -m64.
There's nothing special
On Jan 30, 2010, at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 5:22 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> sage -i /Users/wdj/sagefiles/fluidium-app.spkg
>>
>> gave
>>
>> (lots of lines deleted)
>>
>> x fluidium-spkg/.hg/store/data/spkg-install.i
>
> The person making the spkg made it incorrec
I wrote some notes about building Sage on 't2'. The details are here
http://wiki.sagemath.org/devel/Building-Sage-on-the-T5240-t2
The only thing I am lacking is a URL for you to download the 4.3.0.1 source
code, as that is the only version which will build now. I've got a copy here,
but I can'
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
That will not work. I tried to build Sage 4.3.1.alpha1 and it failed on my
home machine. I think sage 4.3 with
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8088
Do you mean ticket #6595?
http://trac.sage
43 matches
Mail list logo
