The problem was moinmoin hogging all resources.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Looks like trac is down. I'm getting "Service Temporarily Unavailable".
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
>
> >
>
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
Univer
Hi folks,
Looks like trac is down. I'm getting "Service Temporarily Unavailable".
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-un
The goal of trac #6283 is 'Make it so NUM_THREADS is set intelligently
instead of idiotically in makefile so doing "make ptest" or "make
ptestlong" doesn't kill some computer'. Right now, NUM_THREADS (set in
SAGE_ROOT/makefile) is used for parallel testing if you do "make
ptest" or "make ptestlong
-- Forwarded message --
From: Prof. Gregory V. Bard
Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:15 PM
Subject: the use of the t2 machine.
To: William Stein , Tom Boothby
I had a research question which required both
a lot of memory and the latest version of java.
While I discovered "something
On Sep 23, 12:58 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Felix,
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Felix Lawrence
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Minh,
>
> > The doctest failures in
> > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
> > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
> > are m
Hi Felix,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Felix Lawrence
wrote:
>
> Hi Minh,
>
> The doctest failures in
>sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
>sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
> are my fault - I forgot to include a 32-bit answer as well as the 6
On Sep 22, 7:10 pm, Felix Lawrence wrote:
> I've created a patch to apply these two trivial changes, but was
> unsure what the etiquette is for fixing these doctest failures - I
> imagine creating a new ticket would be overkill. Should I add the
> patch to the original (closed) ticket?
If a ti
Hi Minh,
The doctest failures in
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py"
are my fault - I forgot to include a 32-bit answer as well as the 64-
bit answer, e.g.
sage: gp(10.^80)._sage_repr()
'1.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Since we also already have momentum for incorporating mayavi, we should
> also point out the mayavi tvtk "visual" module, whose api is modeled
> after vpython:
>
> https://svn.enthought.com/enthought/wiki/TVTKIntroduction#visual
>
> I've used
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Compiled OK on fedora32 VM on boxen.math, i.e. x86 Fedora 10.
>sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
>sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/expect.py"
>sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interface
Who will file ticket # 7000?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on x86 Debian 5. The following doctests
> failed:
The build machine is debian5-32, a VM guest on boxen.math.
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 also builds on debian5-64, an x86_64 Debian 5 VM
guest on boxen.mat
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on x86 Debian 5. The following doctests failed:
{{{
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/crypto/boolean_function.pyx"
**
File
"/space/wstein/farm/sage-4.1.2.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/crypto/bool
> Sorry if i am stating the obvious here, the reason is that i am trying
> to explain why i think it should be (either implicit or explicit)
> clear over which algebraic structure is computed.
Generally it is -- try parent(foo) or foo.parent() to see what
"algebraic structure" is in play.
sage
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:25:12AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > Variant:
> >
> > sage: R = Zmod(6)
> > sage: R.set_category(Fields())# or maybe better R.add_category
> > (Fields())
> > sage: R in Fields()
> > True
>
Hi Mariah,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Mariah wrote:
>
> A minor typo in the Constructions documentation. The
> Constructions documentation says to send corrections
> to sage-devel.
Thank you for reporting the bug. This is now ticket #6997 [1]. Your
patch has been attached to that ticket.
I spent a while thinking that I was going to be a mechanical engineer,
and took a few of the ME intro courses. Engineering statics and
dynamics can be phrased entirely in terms of linear algebra, though
the courses I took didn't present them as such. Materials analysis is
highly computational in
Hi Burcin,
Thanks for the explanation!
> "Symbolic ring" is an unfortunate name. It doesn't mean much from the
> "mathematical point of view." It's just where all the symbolic stuff
> live in Sage. Maybe we should call it symbolic parent.
I agree that the naming is unfortunate. I think it would
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve wrote:
>
> As my work on prime_pi and nth_prime is drawing to a close, William
> Stein and I have discussed the possibility of me making a graphical
> physics program to be included in Sage, the free open source math
> program.
>
> An example of the desir
Many thanks for this.
There is nothing I can do about this in the near future, for
various reasons, so if someone else wants to create a ticket for this,
that won't bother me:-) If not, I'll eventually get around to it though.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Mariah wrote:
>
> A minor typo in
A minor typo in the Constructions documentation. The
Constructions documentation says to send corrections
to sage-devel.
# HG changeset patch
# User Mariah Lenox
# Date 1253652415 14400
# Node ID bd65499b09ca9c88108908a609648850433dda8a
# Parent 40fe66e6c2b07677706fd983a6be6f3eb86060c5
user: M
Hi,
concerning the libsingular/readline problem, I think that we "just"
should have added the Singular spkg as a new dependency for the
upgrade (because the Python extensions in the Sage library using it
depend on the readline library, see "module_list.py").
Simply rebuilding the Singular spkg (
I looked over the code in sage/graphs/graph.py and when you pass dict
of sets sage just calls the networkx library. However, its a bug that
the loops parameter is not passed correspondingly.
This is easy to get around:
sage: e = {1 : set([1,2,3])}
sage: import networkx
sage: G=networkx.XDiGraph(
Hi Minh,
obviously (look at your own trace output), you are talking about
"singular-3-1-0-4-20090818.spkg", not
"singular-3-1-0-4-20090723.spkg".
Just looking at the top entries of the "SPKG.txt" file of the old
(Sage-4.1.1) "singular-3-1-0-2-20090620.p0.spkg", and of the current
Sage-4.1.2-alph
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Prabhu Ramachandran
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 22 September 2009 11:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
I think we are very close to actually provide a windows binary of
femhub in the next release, I feel it. So I'll be working on this, and
finish it this week.
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 11:31 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> I think we are very close to actually provide a windows binary of
>>> femhub in the next release, I feel it. So I'll be working on this, and
>>> finish it this week.
>> That is great! Are you also rolling in the changes I submitted f
William Stein wrote:
> Maybe he could provide an AJAX-style web-based interface to some
> vpython functionality?
Since we also already have momentum for incorporating mayavi, we should
also point out the mayavi tvtk "visual" module, whose api is modeled
after vpython:
https://svn.enthought.com
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve wrote:
>> An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
>> of code from within a Sage worksheet, or by clicking buttons in a
>> graphical user interface (GUI) create a ph
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:14 AM, kstueve wrote:
> An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
> of code from within a Sage worksheet, or by clicking buttons in a
> graphical user interface (GUI) create a physics problem with
> components such as ramps, blocks, balls, pu
kcrisman wrote:
>
> Built fine on OSX.5. However, get odd behavior of tab-completion.
> Before, it would leave you in just the right spot to add (), but now
> it goes exactly one space further, necessitating an awkward
> backspace. Has anyone else noticed this?
>
> - kcrisman
> >
>
I will
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Hazem wrote:
>
>
> For a list of CAS, some of which are hard to find otherwise:
>
> http://www.computeralgebra.nl/cain.html
Note: "Last Update: May 14, 1998." Is this being maintained any longer?
>
> Good luck,
>
> Hazem
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~
For a list of CAS, some of which are hard to find otherwise:
http://www.computeralgebra.nl/cain.html
Good luck,
Hazem
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Getting back on my late sage e-mails ...
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:25:50PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Robert
>> Bradshaw wrote:
>>> What I'd rather see is something like
>>>
>>> sag
As my work on prime_pi and nth_prime is drawing to a close, William
Stein and I have discussed the possibility of me making a graphical
physics program to be included in Sage, the free open source math
program.
An example of the desired functionality is to either with a few lines
of code from wit
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:57 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed this?
Jason Grout reported this in IRC:
{{{
10:42 < jason-6865> Has anyone noticed that with 4.1.2.alpha2, we have that old
problem with readline again where tab completion puts a
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Prabhu Ramachandran
wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 22 September 2009 12:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> are all fixed and reported. Then all packages that are also in Sage
>> build in cygwin. After that, VTK has to be fixed, but then it seems to
>> build, only it takes ins
Built fine on OSX.5. However, get odd behavior of tab-completion.
Before, it would leave you in just the right spot to add (), but now
it goes exactly one space further, necessitating an awkward
backspace. Has anyone else noticed this?
- kcrisman
--~--~-~--~~~---~--
On Tuesday 22 September 2009 12:50 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> are all fixed and reported. Then all packages that are also in Sage
> build in cygwin. After that, VTK has to be fixed, but then it seems to
> build, only it takes insanely long (an hour or more), so I think I'll
> skip it for now and e
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 fails to compile on t2.math, SPARC Solaris with GCC
4.4.1 and the Sun linker. This time the cause of the failure is due to
ticket #6596 [1] which upgrades Singular to version 3-1-0-4-20090723.
This failure has also been reported for Sage 4.1.2.alpha1. The
relevant tick
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Please test and report all problems.
Error building the PDF version of the reference manual. This is now ticket #6988
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6988
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~-
voila, here it is.
http://bitbucket.org/brickenstein/rumcomponent/src/tip/rumcomponent/
See test_component.py for examples.
Cheers,
Michael
On 22 Sep., 17:33, Michael Brickenstein wrote:
> I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
> I still have a test to
> fix.
> Then
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
A google search for "rietveld mercurial" shows lots of work on this problem.
Jason
--
Jason Grout
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev
Hi sage-devel,
I am currently using Graphs and it is practical for me to create them
from dictionary of sets instead of dictionary of lists :
{{{
sage: e = {1 : set([2,3])}
sage: Graph(e).edges()
[(1, 2, None), (1, 3, None)]
}}}
Everything is fine, but loops are ignored :
{{{
sage: d = {1 : se
I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
I still have a test to
fix.
Then I'll upload it to bitbucket.
After that I'll have to upload it to PYPI, adjust RUM to use it.
Furthermore, I would like to create a wrapper for Pylons/TG2
(somewhere you have to hook in some config
On Arch Linux x86_64, had the same problem as kcrisman. Sage complained
about not finding `libreadline.so.5`. Fixed the problem by creating a
symlink to `libreadline.so`.
ImportError: libreadline.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM, kcr
Sorry, I mean't we *can't* use it without a bit of modification.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> It seems that he was referring to http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/";>Rietveld. If so, it doesn't seem
> we can use it without a bit of modification, since it's for Subve
Hi,
Getting back on my late sage e-mails ...
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:25:50PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Robert
> Bradshaw wrote:
> > What I'd rather see is something like
> >
> > sage: R = Zmod(6)
> > sage: K = categories.Fields(R, check=False) #
It seems that he was referring to http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/";>Rietveld. If so, it doesn't seem we
can use it without a bit of modification, since it's for Subversion.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:28 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol
> wrote:
>
On Sep 22, 4:47 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> Here an example for a sympy review in rietveld..
Ah, that's nice, click on "expand comments" to see annotations inside
diffs:
http://codereview.appspot.com/20078/diff/1/3
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Sep 22, 3:52 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw, who worked all summer at Google, said that they have
> an incredibly good code review webapp there,...
rietveld? Well, it's better than trac i guess, but software alone
isn't everything.
Here an example for a sympy review in rietveld:
h
Upgrade from 4.1.1.alpha1 finished, but then in building Sphinx docs
and when actually running failed due to readline:
ImportError: dlopen(/Users/.../sage-4.1.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_libsingular.so, 2):
Library not loaded: /Users/.../sage-4.1.1/
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
Yes, I hope we will! Any volunteers to set it up?
Robert Bradshaw would be a good candidate since he used it all summer,
etc., however as his thesis adviser I really hope he *won't*
I took a look at this more closely and it appeared to me that a patch
I previously applied to the fmpz_poly_pseudo_divrem function was not
also applied to fmpz_poly_pseudo_div function. After applying that
patch, FLINT returns the correct result for the example you gave.
Indeed this bug could als
Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves?
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> * 96 tickets...
> >
> > I haven't followed each thread lately, but are
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> * 96 tickets...
>
> I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
> improve the review situation?
> It might help if someone is responsible, therefore I propose to crea
On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> * 96 tickets...
I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to
improve the review situation?
It might help if someone is responsible, therefore I propose to create
"review coordinators", who are responsible for one or more catego
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> Marshall Hampton wrote:
>> I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
>> Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
>> I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:06 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>>
>> I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
>> Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
>> I needed to do. I think I have do
Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
> Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
> I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
> much like to see lrs made standard to move the polytope functi
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
> I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
> Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
> I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
> much like to see lrs made
I proposed making the lrs spkg standard about a year ago; Micheal
Abshoff then critiqued the optional spkg and gave me a list of things
I needed to do. I think I have done all of them, and I would very
much like to see lrs made standard to move the polytope functionality
forward. I really doubt
Hi Tim,
Thanks for the response,
> You'll probably want to use an iterator instead. It should be much
> less memory-intensive. Additionally, ``xrange``s are especially
> optimized for iteration.
>
> database = CremonaDatabase().iter(xrange(1, 130001))
Yes, the code I wrote took a really long ti
Hi Nathann!
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 08:27:44PM +0200, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>Linear Programming needs a way to merge programs, to obtain duals without
>more than a call to a .dual() method, and a big database of Linear
>Programs from where other ones can be easily defined.
>
>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:54:20PM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > Please, please, please, finish up to review the remaining
> > categories on
> > http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/wiki/CategoriesCategoriesReview!
> >
> > I'll try to join, but Greenwich time won't be very compatible ...
>
> Depen
Michelle Callaghan - Sun Microsystems wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Sorry for crashing your thread, but I was just searching around to see
> if anyone was running Sage on Solaris and I came upon your dicussions,
> I just wondered if there is a specific customer requirement that you
> know of for Sage on
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Builds fine on x86_64 RHEL 5.3 (lena on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1. All
> doctests pass.
The same goes for centos64 VM guest on boxen.math, i.e. x86_64 CentOS 5.2.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Compiling Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 from scratch went OK on 32-bit openSUSE
> 11.0. Here are the doctest failures on that platform:
>
> ** doctest failures on 32-bit openSUSE 11.0 **
Builds OK on x86_64 openSUSE 11.1 (menas on S
I'll try and join. I'll be up until around noon CST.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:40 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 03:46:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> >>
> >> We have been ext
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on centos32 VM guest on boxen.math,
> i.e. x86 CentOS 5.2. The following doctest fail:
>
> ** doctest failures for x86 CentOS 5.2 **
Builds fine on x86_64 RHEL 5.3 (lena on SkyNet) with GC
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles fine on centos32 VM guest on boxen.math,
i.e. x86 CentOS 5.2. The following doctest fail:
** doctest failures for x86 CentOS 5.2 **
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/pbori.pyx"
***
Hi Niels,
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:45:37 +0200
x x wrote:
>
> Sage is a great project in my opinion, and i hope to contribute, when
> i am more familiar with sage and python. I am not sure whether this
> belongs to sage-support or sage-devel, since i don't understand the
> architecture, in parti
On Sep 17, 9:39 pm, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> Michelle Callaghan - Sun Microsystems wrote:
>
> > Sorry for crashing your thread, but I was just searching around to see
> > if anyone was running Sage on Solaris and I came upon your dicussions,
> > I just wondered if there is a specific customer requ
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles OK on x86 Fedora 9 (cicero on SkyNet) with
> GCC 4.4.1. The following doctests failed:
Compiles OK on x86_64 Fedora 9 (eno on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1. All
doctests pass.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
Hi folks,
Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 compiles OK on x86 Fedora 9 (cicero on SkyNet) with
GCC 4.4.1. The following doctests failed:
** doctest failures on x86 Fedora 9 **
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/misc/randstate.pyx"
**
File
Hi William!
> Many thanks for pointing that out! You're exactly right that I'll
> need a lightweight component architecture, and I'm glad that I don't
> have to write it.
Actually, I am not so very deep in the technical details.
But I know, that Alberto's constructions are always technically
su
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Michael Brickenstein
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I had a small look at it.
>
> Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
> have a lot
> of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
Yes, there is of course a lot of Sage code in it, si
Hi!
I had a small look at it.
Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
have a lot
of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
So it seems, you will need some component architecture like
that we are using in RUM.
It is completely light weight.
The goal is
Hi,
I was able to create a limited functionality separated sage notebook so far:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/patches/sagenb/
One key thing I did was abstract out how the worksheets communicate
with another python process. I then did a reference implementation of
the API. So
This does indeed look like a bug. I can't think of any reason off the
top of my head for the quotients to be different except that one of
them is wrong.
I'm currently working on the next FLINT release and will be sure to
address this problem. There will probably be two FLINT releases
relatively s
79 matches
Mail list logo
