Since it's open source, can we not use it ourselves? On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:52 PM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Harald Schilly > <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sep 15, 10:46 pm, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > >> * 96 tickets... > > > > I haven't followed each thread lately, but are there any ideas how to > > improve the review situation? > > It might help if someone is responsible, therefore I propose to create > > "review coordinators", who are responsible for one or more category > > (e.g. I'm the website guy), and they review or ask others to review. > > We can create a site on trac's wiki for that. Otoh, about my #6612 > > ticket, i have no idea who would be responsible for the "distribution" > > component and besides dropping everything on william, i have no idea > > who is able to review it. > > Another idea is some kind of reward: if you review more, your patches > > are reviewed with higher priority .. but i'm not sure if this could > > work ;) > > > Robert Bradshaw, who worked all summer at Google, said that they have > an incredibly good code review webapp there, which Guido (author of > Python) wrote, and which is open source. He said that because of > how nice this app is, their code review process goes pretty well. > Maybe if we did something like that our process would improve a lot? > Ideas? > > William > > > > -- Tim Joseph Dumol <tim (at) timdumol (dot) com> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
