On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
> On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander > > wrote:
>>>
So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>>>
>>> The author claims it is BSD licen
On 19-Feb-09, at 10:38 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander > wrote:
>>
>>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>>
>> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
>> naive Cholesky is a few dozen l
Nick Alexander wrote:
>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>
> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
> naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
> text book :)
Well, I think the point is that there
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
>
> The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
> naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
> text book :)
Just o
> So it looks like this is a BSD license for all intents and purposes.
The author claims it is BSD license with 3 clauses. It seems that a
naive Cholesky is a few dozen lines, so I could probably just crack a
text book :)
Thanks for the replies.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~--
William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
>> decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
>>
>> Nick
>
> It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder -- precisely ho
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
> decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
>
> Nick
It doesn't raise any red flags for me. I do wonder -- precisely how
does it differ from the BSD l
Hi,
The following is the BSD-like license of some MPFR cholesky
decomposition code I might like to use. Is this sage-able?
Nick
(*
Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The University of Tennessee. All rights
reserved.
Contributor
On Feb 18, 10:41 am, mark mcclure wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:33 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > 3.3.rc2 has been out for a good half day,
>
> I get an error building GMP on my MacBook Pro running
> OS X 10.4.11. The partial log, starting where I think
> things went awry, is below.
>
> It's currently bu
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:54 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Feb 19, 12:51 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>>
>> > Hello all,
>>
>> >Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
>> > includes an interface file and an .spk
Hi,
See below. There will be a Sage workshop in 2010 in February in the
beautiful CIRM in Marseille France
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thierry Monteil
Date: Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:10 PM
Subject: Thematic month Math-Info CIRM 2010 - First announcement
To: nmbrt...@listserv
On Feb 19, 10:18 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> I'd do something like this:
yes, thanks. it's just not very intuitive because you have to know the
solution_dict parameter in advance. i don't know, but it would be
interesting if a syntax like f(sol[0]) could be implemented - or does
it have too many si
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> In IRC I had a question and I don't know how to do it ...
>
> If you have a solution of an equation, how to apply the result to a
> function?
>
> sage: var('x y')
> (x, y)
> sage: solve([x+y==6, x-y==4], x, y)
> [[x == 5, y == 1]]
> sage
On 19-Feb-09, at 9:54 AM, Pierre wrote:
>
>> Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
>> patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you
>> are
>> running Aquamacs?
>
> exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
>
>> (I haven't tri
In IRC I had a question and I don't know how to do it ...
If you have a solution of an equation, how to apply the result to a
function?
sage: var('x y')
(x, y)
sage: solve([x+y==6, x-y==4], x, y)
[[x == 5, y == 1]]
sage: f = 2*x+y
The best I came up is
sage: f.subs(dict([ (s.lhs() , s.rhs())
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
> Carl Witty wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it's far too slow to be useful for anything ...
>
> cool story, but how about sympy, have you tried it? it's maybe worth a
> try!
I never had any intention of doing computations with Sage on my cell
ph
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:40 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> Can you post a picture of it running Sage?
>
> Very impressive work!
I got my brother to take some pictures; the results are here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/timrwit/3292837101/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/timrwit/3293659686/
Carl
--~--~
On Feb 19, 11:51 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > And this BS since it is not running out of memory:
Hi Martin,
> > OK, this is a singular problem for sure. Check this out:
>
> That's only on OSX, right?
Yes.
> I just tried it on my 64-bit Linux box and
> everything is fine. Michael, you
On Feb 19, 11:36 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:56 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> >> > 3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
> Anyway, John, you don't have to worry about this anymore, since it has
> nothing to do with your code.
>
> Martin Al
> And this BS since it is not running out of memory:
>
> sage: for p in prime_range(390,1):
> if p%13==1: print get_memory_usage()
> v.append(E.change_ring(GF(p)))
> ...
> 139.0
> 139.0
> 139.0
> 140.0
> 141.0
> 141.0
> 141.0
>
> error: no more memory
> System 5120k:5120k Appl 4638k/48
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:56 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> > 3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
>>
>> > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_finite_field.py"
>> > A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may hav
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:59 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>>
>> sage: !cal 9r 1752r
>> September 1752
>> Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
>> 1 2 14 15 16
>> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
>> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
>
> Wow, that's amazing. What about in Russia or Italy, though?
>
> As a non-joke, this isn't ?-ab
>
> sage: !cal 9r 1752r
> September 1752
> Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
> 1 2 14 15 16
> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Wow, that's amazing. What about in Russia or Italy, though?
As a non-joke, this isn't ?-able, though. How would someone find this
by looking under ca[tab]?
John Cremona wrote:
> I hope we will fully support this kind of thing:
>
> %cal 9 1752
>September 1752
> Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
>1 2 14 15 16
> 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
> 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
>
> Well, someone asked for jokes!
Already done :)
sage: !cal 9r 1752r
September 1752
Su Mo
I taught one of the programmers for this, Stephen DeSalvo, a few years
ago; I think he is the brother of the founder, Chris DeSalvo. It was
a dynamical systems course, and I recall that he was interested in
some of the computational aspects so that he could develop things for
this software (then
>> Not so easy to fix...
>
> With the original code, yes. With the newer code that accumulates
> output and post-processes it, not so hard.
Now I agree. The difficult part is having three latex processes with
three sentinels.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
On 19-Feb-09, at 8:56 AM, Matthias Meulien wrote:
>
>> Would that were true! There are plenty of bugs left, maybe you will
>> help me fix them :)
>
> I am currently working on `the multiple output bug'. More precisely,
> in case we run the following code, three overlays should be inserted
> in
On 19-Feb-09, at 9:54 AM, Pierre wrote:
>
>> Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
>> patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you
>> are
>> running Aquamacs?
>
> exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
That's fine.
>> (
> Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
> patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you are
> running Aquamacs?
exactly, but in reverse order (applying the patch came last)
>(I haven't tried it with aquamacs.) Also, the
> inline equation
Anyone know anything about this?
http://www.spacetime.us/
Not sure what features are "only available in Mathematica and Matlab",
but this seems quite impressive. Apparently someone is making money
off of mobile scientific calculation. Maybe Carl's build wasn't the
most pointless ever after all
I hope we will fully support this kind of thing:
%cal 9 1752
September 1752
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Well, someone asked for jokes!
John
On 12 Feb, 08:50, ghtdak wrote:
> On Feb 11, 3:47 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Feb 11, 3:40 p
> Would that were true! There are plenty of bugs left, maybe you will
> help me fix them :)
I am currently working on `the multiple output bug'. More precisely,
in case we run the following code, three overlays should be inserted
in the sage buffer:
m = Matrix(QQ, 5)
m.randomize()
for i in ra
On 19-Feb-09, at 2:24 AM, Pierre wrote:
>
> hello all,
>
> i've posted this in sage-support with no luck. Strikes me it might be
> for sage-devel...
>
> I've installed the latest package for emacs, now with sage-view. Wow !
> very very cool, all the bugs are gone.
Would that were true! There a
On Feb 19, 8:15 am, Dan Grayson wrote:
> Thank you for your remarks, William.
Hi,
> By the way, M2 builds much more easily now, basically because it can,
> if needed, build, and even download and patch for you, all the
> libraries it depends on: singular-factory, singular-libfac, ntl,
> frobb
> It is also quite early on the west
> coast, so he might reply soonish. Nick uses MacOSX, so he might be
> able to narrow it down quickly.
He just woke up!
Let me make sure I know the situation: you have applied that small
patch, you have installed sage-mode-0.5.1 (from the wiki), and you are
Thank you for your remarks, William.
By the way, M2 builds much more easily now, basically because it can,
if needed, build, and even download and patch for you, all the
libraries it depends on: singular-factory, singular-libfac, ntl,
frobby, pari, lapack, libgc, gmp, and mpfr. Building seems fl
Thanks Georg, my memory is not what it used to be! I just hate to see
this error recurring apparantly in something I wrote
John
On 19 Feb, 11:29, "Georg S. Weber" wrote:
> > Can William or someone who gets this error (I don't!) test what
> > happens if you replace
>
> > G=E.change_ring(GF(
On Feb 19, 6:28 am, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 19, 6:18 am, Simon King wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > > The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
> > > Singular 3-1-0:
>
> > > This is the code you have to fix in multi_polynomial_libsingul
On Feb 19, 6:18 am, Simon King wrote:
> On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
> > Singular 3-1-0:
>
> > This is the code you have to fix in multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx
>
> > if algorithm == "ezgcd":
> >
On Feb 19, 5:40 am, Pierre wrote:
> > * run
Hi Pierre,
> > hg_sage.apply("http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/
> > ticket/5147/trac_5147-plot-output-filename.patch")
>
> i've tried that. It didn't seem to complain too much, though i did get
> the message:
>
> WARNING:
> Make su
On Feb 19, 3:02 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> The issue you are hitting are ironically related to the GCD changes in
> Singular 3-1-0:
>
> This is the code you have to fix in multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx
>
> if algorithm == "ezgcd":
> Off(SW_USE_CHINREM_GCD)
> On(SW_US
On Feb 19, 2:47 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> This seems to be Sage 3.1.2, so is it 3.1.2 or is it upgraded? It
> might very well be that this singular.spkg you have been building
> needs a recent Sage, but Martin knows more about that glue code than I
> do.
It is Sage 3.1.2, built from sources and not
On Feb 19, 5:56 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi Simon,
> On Feb 19, 2:37 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > > BTW, I think it would be a good thing to be able to up- or downgrade
> > > individual components of Sage. In this case, my motivation was a bug
> > > that only occured in Singular-3-0-
Hi Michael,
On Feb 19, 2:37 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> > BTW, I think it would be a good thing to be able to up- or downgrade
> > individual components of Sage. In this case, my motivation was a bug
> > that only occured in Singular-3-0-4.
>
> This will never work in any reliable way and I don't thin
Hi there:
First of all, I officially release my modifications of the sage logo
under the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license, as
it's a derivative work of Alex's and his license now obliges me to
share-alike ;-)
Now, being settled that, I have some thoughts about the ongoing
d
On Feb 19, 5:29 am, Simon King wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> I copied the info that ./sage -b gave me into some file
> installSAGE_B.log.
> You can find the two install.log
> athttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/SimonKing/SPKG/
Ok, you build three of the four extensions
> * run
>
> hg_sage.apply("http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/
> ticket/5147/trac_5147-plot-output-filename.patch")
i've tried that. It didn't seem to complain too much, though i did get
the message:
WARNING:
Make sure to create a ~/.hgrc file:
---
On Feb 19, 5:29 am, Simon King wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Are you 100% certain you didn't build singular's NTL version at some
> > point? Maybe there is a second ntl.h?
>
> I checked. No ntl.h in the spkg.
Ok.
> BTW, I think it would be a good thing to be able to up
On Feb 19, 1:35 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> Are you 100% certain you didn't build singular's NTL version at some
> point? Maybe there is a second ntl.h?
I checked. No ntl.h in the spkg.
> ...
> And the above error clearly indicates that there is an NTL mixup since
> the error callback code is not in
On Feb 19, 5:20 am, Pierre wrote:
Hi Pierre,
> > > (...) Use sage-view in an inferior sage buffer to have all your output
> > > latexed and your plot commands appear inline in the inferior sage
> > > buffer -- after you apply the patch at
> > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5147.
>
> > (...) Use sage-view in an inferior sage buffer to have all your output
> > latexed and your plot commands appear inline in the inferior sage
> > buffer -- after you apply the patch at
> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5147.
>
> I've not tried it. But it seems to be the thing your ar
On Feb 19, 4:22 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > Well, recollecting my memories of the error it looks like you are
> > still using Singular's NTL or NTL is linked statically into
> > libSingular or something like that.
>
> From spkg_changes:
> rm -rf ntl
> rm -rf modules
> rm -rf MP
> You should not post code from
> a non-public CVS without the expressed permission of the Singular
> team.
That is certainly right. Sorry that I did for a few minutes.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
Hi Michael,
> Well, recollecting my memories of the error it looks like you are
> still using Singular's NTL or NTL is linked statically into
> libSingular or something like that.
>From spkg_changes:
rm -rf ntl
rm -rf modules
rm -rf MP
So, there is no NTL in the package.
I don't know if NTL
On Feb 19, 4:10 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Michael
>
> On Feb 19, 12:47 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> ...
Hi Simon,
> > > Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
> > > don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone else can take a
> > > look?
>
> > Well, gi
On Feb 19, 4:15 am, Simon King wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:02 pm, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Simon,
> > We discussed that already, but once more: check devel/sage/
> > module_list.py for all extensions that link against libSingular and
> > touch them, followed by a sage -b or see below.
>
> Well, you sent
On Feb 19, 1:02 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> We discussed that already, but once more: check devel/sage/
> module_list.py for all extensions that link against libSingular and
> touch them, followed by a sage -b or see below.
Well, you sent me a list of these extensions off list, and I touched
all of th
Hi Michael
On Feb 19, 12:47 pm, mabshoff wrote:
...
> > Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
> > don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone else can take a look?
>
> Well, given that it is last week's CVS that might not be a good
> idea :)
To mak
On Feb 19, 3:55 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Feb 19, 12:39 pm, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
> > don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone el
On Thursday 19 February 2009, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Feb 19, 12:39 pm, Martin Albrecht
>
> wrote:
> > On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
> >
> > Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
> > don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that s
Hi Martin,
On Feb 19, 12:39 pm, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Simon, since it is rather hard to guess what your problem is exactly, why
> don't you just post the SPKG somewhere so that someone else can take a look?
OK, see
http://sage.math.washingto
Hello
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interfacing a C++ class with cython. Because my C++ class inherit
> from a std::basic_string class I inherit some tests method like :
>bool My_class :: test_function()
>
> It seems that
Hi,
I'm interfacing a C++ class with cython. Because my C++ class inherit
from a std::basic_string class I inherit some tests method like :
bool My_class :: test_function()
It seems that Cython do not know the C++ bool type and, consequently,
there is no direct conversion between C++ boolean
On Feb 19, 3:39 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
> > It isn't what we want to do in general in the future, but it should
> > fix your problem. I have no idea if this causes a performance impact,
> > but Martin might be able to shed some light on this
On Thursday 19 February 2009, mabshoff wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:50 am, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> > PS:> 2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
> >
> > Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
>
> Yeah, that was more than a couple emails to sort i
> Can William or someone who gets this error (I don't!) test what
> happens if you replace
>
> G=E.change_ring(GF(p)).abelian_group()
>
> by
>
> N=E.change_ring(GF(p)).cardinality()
>
> ? The cardinality will be provided by pari, so if it is a pari
> problem that should still cause a problem. T
Hi Pierre,
> I've installed the latest package for emacs, now with sage-view. Wow !
> very very cool, all the bugs are gone.
Thanks to Nick Alexander's great work!
> could i combine this behavior with the nice formulae of sage-view ?
> this would be the definite death of the notebook for me (no
Doron Zeilberger recently wrote one of his (in?)famous opinions in
response to Freeman Dyson's article on birds and frogs in the AMS Notices:
http://www.math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/Opinion95.html
He writes:
> ...even more important, for the progress of mathematics in the
> computer age, is the be
hello all,
i've posted this in sage-support with no luck. Strikes me it might be
for sage-devel...
I've installed the latest package for emacs, now with sage-view. Wow !
very very cool, all the bugs are gone.
I was wondering, however, how the plots work within sage-view : if i
try
P= plot(lamb
Dear Michael,
On Feb 19, 10:56 am, mabshoff wrote:
...
> Other than that: Is this the beta9 snapshot you are having trouble
> with or the CVS checkout? I don't have too much time this week for
> experiments, but a build log might shed some light on this.
It is the current (last week) CVS.
Chee
>
>
> > 3. A segfault on OS X 10.5 32-bit Intel (bsd.math.washington.edu):
>
> > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_finite_field.py"
> > A mysterious error (perphaps a memory error?) occurred, which may have
> > crashed doctest.
> > [22.7 s]
>
> > Doing this aga
On Feb 19, 1:50 am, Simon King wrote:
Hi Simon,
> PS:> 2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
>
> Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
Yeah, that was more than a couple emails to sort it all out, but now
you should be able to upgrade the singul
PS:
> 2. Create an spkg for Singular-3-1-0-beta, and install it.
Thanks to Michael and Martin for helping me to create the spkg!
Cheers,
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gro
Dear developers,
Singular-3-0-4 introduced a bug that made one of my computations not
work. It did work with Singular-3-0-3, and some tests indicate that it
would also work with the current CVS version of Singular-3-1-0.
So, I tried two things
1. Take a Singular-3-0-3-spkg from a previous sage
On Feb 19, 12:51 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
>
> > Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
> > includes an interface file and an .spkg.
>
> Where is the interface file and spkg posted? Did you fo
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:48 AM, jeffblakeslee wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
> includes an interface file and an .spkg.
Where is the interface file and spkg posted? Did you forget to include
a link in this email?
-- William
> M
Hello all,
Please consider voting on the addition of msieve to sage. This
includes an interface file and an .spkg. Msieve, by Jason
Papadopoulos, should increase the integer factorization functionality
of Sage. I'll quote the words of Jason in the Readme file by way of
explanation:
"There
77 matches
Mail list logo
