On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:40 PM, John H Palmieri
wrote:
>
> I have a first draft of a module which implements simplicial
> complexes, chain complexes, and their homology. It isn't perfect: it
> is limited by Sage's abilities to deal with modules over arbitrary
> commutative rings, or at least b
I have a first draft of a module which implements simplicial
complexes, chain complexes, and their homology. It isn't perfect: it
is limited by Sage's abilities to deal with modules over arbitrary
commutative rings, or at least by my knowledge of Sage's abilities.
Thus for example, you can define
I have been using TinyMCE for about three weeks now. My ultimate goal
would be to to do something along the lines that David Joyner mentions
in a previous message (have students create worksheets that have
comments/interpretation between the cells).
TinyMCE works very well as far as editing goes,
Done.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:29 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Can somebody fix this? (see below)
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Paul Zimmermann
> Date: Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 PM
> Subject: Re: matrices over GF(p)[x]
> To: William Stein
>
>
> William,
>
> it
Can somebody fix this? (see below)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Paul Zimmermann
Date: Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: matrices over GF(p)[x]
To: William Stein
William,
it seems http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageDays needs an update:
Upcoming Sage Days
* Sa
As a first step I have made a new ticket for an improved spkg, which
has "make check" test set in the makefile. If that looks OK I will
try to get it merged upstream.
So I would appreciate it if anyone can review #5018:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5018.
Marshall
On Jan 18, 11:22
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, William Stein wrote:
> That is weird. What a horrible bug! Thanks for reporting this. It
> is now trac #5015:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5015
>
I've posted a patch which fixes this.
--Mike
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~-
Bill,
On Jan 18, 5:34 pm, Bill Page wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:17 AM, luis wrote:
>
> > Patch 4036 applied smoothly.
>
> Trac ticket 4036 contains 4 patches
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/4036
>
> Did they all apply smoothly? If so, I am surprised since this
2009/1/18 mabshoff :
>
>
>
> On Jan 18, 2:36 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> > This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
>> > his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
>>
>> I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in que
On Jan 18, 8:43 am, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 8:44 pm, mabshoff wrote:
Hi Marshall,
> > If you look at the Makefile of this code you should clearly see that
> > it needs cleaning up and rewriting it from scratch in this case might
> > be easier since only a couple files are involved. On p
On Jan 18, 2:36 am, "John Cremona" wrote:
Hi John,
> > This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
> > his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
>
> I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in question being
> (Professor Sir Peter)
On Jan 17, 8:44 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> If you look at the Makefile of this code you should clearly see that
> it needs cleaning up and rewriting it from scratch in this case might
> be easier since only a couple files are involved. On problem right off
> the bat is that compiler as well as build
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:17 AM, luis wrote:
>
> Patch 4036 applied smoothly.
Trac ticket 4036 contains 4 patches
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/4036
Did they all apply smoothly? If so, I am surprised since this is not
the case for me. That is the reason for the discussi
Hi,
Patch 4036 applied smoothly.
Patch 4633, on the contrary, didn't apply.
The line numbers mentioned in the patch
are different from these in my sources
for the same piece of code.
Regards,
Luis
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-d
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:50 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 18, 7:46 am, Bill Page wrote:
>> Let us know if you have any problems/questions applying Mike's
>> patches.
>>
>> If you become a dedicated user of Axiom within Sage (like I am),
>> then this might motivate me to contribute a few more patc
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:38 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 17, 10:31 am, David Joyner wrote:
>> Given your time constraints and the problems you mentioned,
>> what I would do is the following (though possibly Michael might
>> recommend something else):
>>
>> (a) apply to a clone of the most recent
On Jan 18, 7:46 am, Bill Page wrote:
Hi Bill,
> Let us know if you have any problems/questions applying Mike's patches.
>
> If you become a dedicated user of Axiom within Sage (like I am), then
> this might motivate me to contribute a few more patches (via trac)
> that are still in my local
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 10:33 AM, luis wrote:
> ...
> On Jan 18, 3:38 pm, Bill Page wrote:
>> You could try the patch discussed in this email:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/c12983a22e0b7d90
>>
>
> I applied the first patch mentioned in the e-mail you quoted.
> It solved my sy
Bill,
Thanks.
On Jan 18, 3:38 pm, Bill Page wrote:
> Please use the Sage email list. That is why it is here. Private emails
> are for private conversations.
OK.
> You could try the patch discussed in this email:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/c12983a22e0b7d90
>
I applied
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:08 AM, YannLC wrote:
>
> but in fact the same error occurs without ns=1...
>
> --
> | Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() f
On Jan 18, 6:34 am, mhampton wrote:
> On Jan 17, 8:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
Hi Marshall,
> > I don't think there should even be a vote until you sign off on the
> > platform support. Getting new packages into sage involves two
> > things: (1) a list of minimum requirements about code q
but in fact the same error occurs without ns=1...
--
| Sage Version 3.2.3, Release Date: 2009-01-05 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:00 AM, YannLC wrote:
>
> another strange coercion error:
Using variables with "ns=1" isn't done yet. It's still experimental
code, and many standard things should not work. I wrote a first
version about 6 months ago, Burcin Erocal polished it a lot and got
into sage
Luis,
Please use the Sage email list. That is why it is here. Private emails
are for private conversations.
You could try the patch discussed in this email:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/c12983a22e0b7d90
There are several threads on the sage-devel list about synchronization
pro
On Jan 17, 8:57 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I don't think there should even be a vote until you sign off on the
> platform support. Getting new packages into sage involves two
> things: (1) a list of minimum requirements about code quality and
> portability, and (2) sufficient interest and s
another strange coercion error:
sage: var('x',ns=1)
x
sage: f(x)=x
sage: f*e
[...]
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
s
> This obviously leads to the joke about the professor being asked what
> his favorite programming language is and the answer being "PhD" :)
I believe that is actually a *true* story, the prof in question being
(Professor Sir Peter) Swinnerton-Dyer. He was asked what programming
language he used
27 matches
Mail list logo
