Em Sex, 2008-11-14 às 16:05 -0800, Harald Schilly escreveu:
>
> > > * Discrete calculus
>
> i think they mean finite element methods, for PDEs and stuff like that
>
Or something related to Dirac's or Kronecker's delta functions, which
allow passing from continuous domain to discrete.
Or Z-tran
> > * Discrete calculus
i think they mean finite element methods, for PDEs and stuff like that
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more option
William Stein wrote:
>> * Vector and field visualization
>
> New? I wonder how? It seems like they have had this for a long time.
There are lots of cool visualations you could do with vector fields that
they don't have yet. For example, see the following (sorry, these are
from a sage
Fro
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just received this in an email from Wolfram:
>
> Dear Mathematica User,
>
> Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service
Yeah!
> subscriber, you will receive a download link enabling you to
> immediately ac
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:10:07 +
Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 November 2008, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:38:03 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > David Møller Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I would really like to start such a project.
> > >
> > > Bu
I recently thought about implementing more functions used by non-math
people (I'm an Electronic Engineering student).
I started by trying to make a Bode plot, but after a lot of digging to
find how to make subplots and how to use logarithmic scale in plot(), I
found that if applying that kind of
On Nov 14, 2008, at 7:05 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Nov 14, 12:26 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Franco Saliola wrote:
>>>
> Any comments or objections?
What about list comprehensions? Something like the following.
sage: var('i,n
Em Qui, 2008-11-13 às 19:35 -0800, kcrisman escreveu:
> http://www.apple.com/iphone/appstore/content/educationtop8application.html
> http://www.colombiamug.com/ES/Bienvenidos.html
>
> Just a reminder that there could be a very big 'market' for Sage Lite
> if/when it appears... in the meantime sou
Em Sex, 2008-11-14 às 05:06 -0800, Harald Schilly escreveu:
> On Nov 14, 9:26 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sage: sum(2^i for i in range(n+1))
>
> > sum(i for i in (1..oo))
>
> They look nice, but i doubt if they could work. e.g. think of more
> than one variable and relations
I've been reading "Indra's Pearls: The Vision of Felix Klein" by
Mumford, et al, lately and as I started implementing some of their
graphics in Sage it occured to me there might already be some support
for this. I realize that I can use Sage's matrices for some of this,
and I am mostly writing fu
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Nov 14, 12:26 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Franco Saliola wrote:
>>
Any comments or objections?
>>> What about list comprehensions? Something like the following.
>>> sage: var('i,n')
>>> (i, n)
>>> sage: sum(2^i for i in range(n+1))
>>> 2^(
Yeah well I guess that the project would be started as an optional
package at first and then if the code is licensed under GPLv3 it would
be, I would guess straight forward to get it into Sage.
I'll try to give some comments on the dev. guide after reading it.
/David
On 14 Nov., 15:05, Martin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 November 2008, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Martin Albrecht
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote:
>> >> I would really lik
On Friday 14 November 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Martin Albrecht
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote:
> >> I would really like to start such a project.
> >
> > Great!
> >
> >> But I wouldn't know the first thin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote:
>> I would really like to start such a project.
>
> Great!
>
>> But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
>
> I suppose the first thing to do, is to lo
I know this is late, but all tests passed and the build went fine on
my work machine, which runs amd64 hardy heron.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:24 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> here is 3.2.rc0 and I have to confess that I cheated: I did build this
> on numerous platf
On Friday 14 November 2008, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:38:03 -0800 (PST)
>
> David Møller Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would really like to start such a project.
> >
> > But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
> >
> > - Think I'll start by reading up on
On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote:
> I would really like to start such a project.
Great!
> But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
I suppose the first thing to do, is to look through the list of requirements
and check the PBC library if it qualifies. It can st
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:38:03 -0800 (PST)
David Møller Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would really like to start such a project.
>
> But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
>
> - Think I'll start by reading up on Sage dev. guide.
>
> Do you usually keep track of projects
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Jason Grout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> In addition to fixing the above bug with "(", it would also be nice to
>> set the notebook to use tachyon by default automatically
>> instead of jmol, since the iphone doesn't have java, so can
I would really like to start such a project.
But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
- Think I'll start by reading up on Sage dev. guide.
Do you usually keep track of projects here in the sage-devel group?
On 14 Nov., 13:39, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Friday
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:55 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> the earlier crash of sagemath.org was caused by the wiki eating up all
> available memory while being pegged at 100% CPU. I killed the wiki for
> now and we are investigating solutions, but this might take a
On Nov 14, 9:26 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sage: sum(2^i for i in range(n+1))
> sum(i for i in (1..oo))
They look nice, but i doubt if they could work. e.g. think of more
than one variable and relationships between them (e.g. for all i,j in
N where i>j and i mod 7 == 0 and so
On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote:
> I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow
> implementation.
>
> But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython
> wrappers of their c code and placing their code in SAGE won't it then
> be a problem with dupli
Hello,
On Nov 14, 12:26 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Franco Saliola wrote:
>
> >> Any comments or objections?
>
> > What about list comprehensions? Something like the following.
>
> > sage: var('i,n')
> > (i, n)
> > sage: sum(2^i for i in range(n+1))
> > 2^(n+1) - 1
>
> > I ask be
I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow
implementation.
But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython
wrappers of their c code and placing their code in SAGE won't it then
be a problem with duplication of functionality?
Couldn't a lot of similar functions "wate
I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow
implementation.
But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython
wrappers of their c code and placing their code in SAGE won't it then
be a problem with duplication of functionality?
Couldn't a lot of similar functions "wate
Franco Saliola wrote:
>>
>> Any comments or objections?
>
> What about list comprehensions? Something like the following.
>
> sage: var('i,n')
> (i, n)
> sage: sum(2^i for i in range(n+1))
> 2^(n+1) - 1
>
> I ask because this seems like the natural/first thing a user would try.
It's consistent
28 matches
Mail list logo
