I would really like to start such a project. But I wouldn't know the first thing on how to do so..
- Think I'll start by reading up on Sage dev. guide. Do you usually keep track of projects here in the sage-devel group? On 14 Nov., 13:39, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote: > > > I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow > > implementation. > > > But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython > > wrappers of their c code and placing their code in SAGE won't it then > > be a problem with duplication of functionality? > > Sure, that could be a problem but can be dealt with on a case to case basis. > > > Couldn't a lot of similar functions "water down" the whole quality of > > SAGE? > > As long as we have one really good implementation, I don't see an issue. > > > Is there a defined group of people to join on getting the pbc library > > into SAGE? > > I am not aware of anybody working on this. Do you want to start such a > project? > > Also, note that these days new packages have to be voted in to be included > with Sage. See also: > > http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node41.html > > Cheers, > Martin > > -- > name: Martin Albrecht > _pgp:http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 > _www:http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb > _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
