On Friday 14 November 2008, David Møller Hansen wrote: > I agree with the teaching and research justifying a slow > implementation. > > But in the not so distant future when every one is making Cython > wrappers of their c code and placing their code in SAGE won't it then > be a problem with duplication of functionality?
Sure, that could be a problem but can be dealt with on a case to case basis. > Couldn't a lot of similar functions "water down" the whole quality of > SAGE? As long as we have one really good implementation, I don't see an issue. > Is there a defined group of people to join on getting the pbc library > into SAGE? I am not aware of anybody working on this. Do you want to start such a project? Also, note that these days new packages have to be voted in to be included with Sage. See also: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/prog/node41.html Cheers, Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
