On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I plan to start implementing a user interface to symbolic summation
> soon and I want to get some opinions on how this interface should be.
>
> The most natural construct for summation, either of a list or symbol
On Nov 13, 2008, at 10:41 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> For all you coercion gurus: what's the status of trac 804? I
>>> bring it
>>> up as part of the linear algebra old-tickets housecleaning.
>>
>> I don't think th
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> For all you coercion gurus: what's the status of trac 804? I bring it
>> up as part of the linear algebra old-tickets housecleaning.
>
> I don't think there's any coercion holdups there.
Does that mean we should clos
On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> For all you coercion gurus: what's the status of trac 804? I bring it
> up as part of the linear algebra old-tickets housecleaning.
I don't think there's any coercion holdups there.
- Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~---
Burcin Erocal wrote:
> otherwise call the python sum function. (Actually, I recall that there
> were plans to overwrite this function anyway with one that does
> balanced summation if the argument is a list.)
>
See trac 2737
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> (Actually, I recall that there
> were plans to overwrite this function anyway with one that does
> balanced summation if the argument is a list.)
FYI, see trac #2737
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-
For all you coercion gurus: what's the status of trac 804? I bring it
up as part of the linear algebra old-tickets housecleaning.
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this grou
William Stein wrote:
>
> In addition to fixing the above bug with "(", it would also be nice to
> set the notebook to use tachyon by default automatically
> instead of jmol, since the iphone doesn't have java, so can't
> use jmol.
Let's make this a user setting for the notebook, but set the def
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:35 PM, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.apple.com/iphone/appstore/content/educationtop8application.html
> http://www.colombiamug.com/ES/Bienvenidos.html
>
> Just a reminder that there could be a very big 'market' for Sage Lite
> if/when it appears... in
Hello folks,
the earlier crash of sagemath.org was caused by the wiki eating up all
available memory while being pegged at 100% CPU. I killed the wiki for
now and we are investigating solutions, but this might take a little
while to resolve.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~
http://www.apple.com/iphone/appstore/content/educationtop8application.html
http://www.colombiamug.com/ES/Bienvenidos.html
Just a reminder that there could be a very big 'market' for Sage Lite
if/when it appears... in the meantime sounds like a great way to get
some quick graphs on a phone. In ca
On Nov 11, 2008, at 04:24 , mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
[snip]
>
> Sources and a sage.math only binary can be found at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2/
Built w/o problems on Mac OS X, 10.5.5 (Dual Quad Xeon). Testing
revealed two failures (see below)
On Nov 13, 2008, at 6:12 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to start implementing a user interface to symbolic summation
>> soon and I want to get some opinions on how this interface should be.
>>
>> The
> > Sometime in January, I plan to get a public notebook server going and
> > I'd like to have some PR material ready to go.
>
> When you do plan to get this server going, let me know. The new sagenb.org,
> which is just a 64-bit linux vmware machine, seems to be actually working
> extremely we
>
> I vote for 1j being the Python complex number. This is because the only
> people I can ever imagine using the notation "j" in Sage are numerical
> numpy-type users who would be very annoyed to get Sage complex numbers
> ever.
Actually, at least Electric/Electronic Engineering doesn't use i
On Nov 13, 8:19 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:18 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 13, 8:13 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> > I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
> >> > obso
On Nov 13, 8:18 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 13, 8:13 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > > I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
> > > obsolete when the pbc library is ported into SAGE...
>
> > Is anyone working on this?
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:18 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 13, 8:13 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> > I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
>> > obsolete when the pbc library is ported into SAGE...
>>
>> Is anyone workin
> I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
> obsolete when the pbc library is ported into SAGE...
Is anyone working on this?
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_www: http://www.informatik.uni
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:02 AM, David Møller Hansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good point on the multi-user system. Maybe a script is the best way to
> go about the problem of initializing the signature scheme for my
> thesis professors.
>
> I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my
On Nov 13, 8:13 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
> > obsolete when the pbc library is ported into SAGE...
>
> Is anyone working on this?
Not that I am aware of. The issue last time this came up was that pbc
> > sage: numpy.linalg.inv(a)
> >
> > array([[ 2.25125019e+15, -4.50250038e+15, 2.25125019e+15],
> > [ -4.50250038e+15, 9.00500077e+15, -4.50250038e+15],
> > [ 2.25125019e+15, -4.50250038e+15, 2.25125019e+15]])
>
> I get this:
> sage: scipy.linalg.inv(a)
>
> array([[
Good point on the multi-user system. Maybe a script is the best way to
go about the problem of initializing the signature scheme for my
thesis professors.
I will gladly contribute, but I'm guessing that my code will be pretty
obsolete when the pbc library is ported into SAGE...
- I'll just have
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:24 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> On the note of making it easy to understand, what would people think
> of renaming Parent to SetObject or even just Set? This would clear up
> the very frequently asked question "what is a Parent?" to give it a
> more mathematically-groun
Hello, basically, everything that interests somebody could be included
in Sage. The procedure is first to create some bindings (we use
"Cython") to call C/C++ code from python. (i.e. it should convert the
vectors/matrices/tensors from sage to the specific data structures ,
etc.)
Then, a so called
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:03 AM, David Møller Hansen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> So I'm getting to the point in my masters thesis where I have coded
> some different .sage files and now I have to package it in some way
> making it easy to use with SAGE for my professor and the censor.
>
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I plan to start implementing a user interface to symbolic summation
> soon and I want to get some opinions on how this interface should be.
>
> The most natural construct for summation, either of a list or symbol
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:06 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 at 01:31AM -0800, Harald Schilly wrote:
>> On Nov 13, 8:25 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > ... is there any progress on that front?
>>
>> Hi, yes and no, I still have it in my head but no time
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 at 01:31AM -0800, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 13, 8:25 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ... is there any progress on that front?
>
> Hi, yes and no, I still have it in my head but no time at the moment.
> Is there a certain deadline? I could try if I can do somet
Hi,
I plan to start implementing a user interface to symbolic summation
soon and I want to get some opinions on how this interface should be.
The most natural construct for summation, either of a list or symbolic
summation is of course "sum." Initially, I was thinking that it's a big
sin to over
Hi
So I'm getting to the point in my masters thesis where I have coded
some different .sage files and now I have to package it in some way
making it easy to use with SAGE for my professor and the censor.
I just want to explain the content of my implementation in short:
It is basically a slow pai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bjarke Hammersholt Roune wrote:
> On Nov 12, 5:47 am, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Looks like:
>>#include
>> is missing.
>>
> Yep, that is the case. I wonder if why my gcc d
On Nov 13, 8:25 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ... is there any progress on that front?
Hi, yes and no, I still have it in my head but no time at the moment.
Is there a certain deadline? I could try if I can do something this
weekend. Any specific wishes for the size? I assume your
>> You know that FriCAS/Aldor does not have this drawback? Eg., the set of all
>> combinatorial species forms a Ring...
A semi-ring, we don't have virtual species yet.
> Thanks for pointing this out. Could you make a quick summary here of
> how this is achieved?
I don't know what Martin refers
Hi Martin,
> You know that FriCAS/Aldor does not have this drawback? Eg., the set of all
> combinatorial species forms a Ring...
Thanks for pointing this out. Could you make a quick summary here of
how this is achieved?
Each combinatorial species is a domain, right? Are they simultaneo
On Nov 12, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 07:13:58PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> If I understand your code correctly, what you're proposing is that to
>> declare an Parent/Element to be a member of a category, one creates
>> the category and then dynamic
36 matches
Mail list logo
