Hi William,
On 1 Okt., 18:16, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Snip...
>
> >> temp2 := Derivative(temp[1],w) + Derivative(temp[2],x) +
> >> Derivative(temp[3],y) + Derivative(temp[4],z);
> >> ---
> >> I ge
On Oct 1, 8:29 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi David,
> Slightly different failures for sage -testall than others have reported:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/magma.py
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/rin
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:28 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha2 is out. It took a little longer and we ended up fixing some
> hard to track down bugs while waiting to merge some more spkgs. The
> highlight is likely the pynac.spkg - note that the actual library
> i
[X ] Yes, include these in Sage
On Oct 1, 2:37 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 3:23 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [X ] Yes, include these in Sage
>
> In total we had a whole lot of votes for inclusion (too lazt to count)
> and none against it, so I cons
On Oct 1, 6:11 pm, "Minh Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> sage-3.1.2 source distribution was successfully built on ThinkPad R40
> laptop with this architecture:
>
> System --- Slackware 12.0, 32-bit
> Kernel --- 2.6.21.5-smp
> Processor --- Intel Pentium 4 - M, 2.00 GHz, 512 MB
On Oct 1, 6:09 pm, "Minh Nguyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> sage-3.1.2 source distribution was successfully built on MacBook with
> this architecture:
>
> System --- Mac OS X 10.4.8 (8N1430), 32-bit
> Kernel --- Darwin 8.8.5
> Processor --- Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GHz, 1 GB RAM
>
> T
Hi Burcin,
I believe that Harald Schilly was working to set it up on the actual
sagemath.org website, though in terms of a static location for the
site I would say that
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/elliottd/calctut/intro.html
(or the sagecalculus.com/.org/.net redirect, for brevity) is p
Hi folks,
sage-3.1.2 source distribution was successfully built on ThinkPad R40
laptop with this architecture:
System --- Slackware 12.0, 32-bit
Kernel --- 2.6.21.5-smp
Processor --- Intel Pentium 4 - M, 2.00 GHz, 512 MB RAM
However, the following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/par
Hi folks,
sage-3.1.2 source distribution was successfully built on MacBook with
this architecture:
System --- Mac OS X 10.4.8 (8N1430), 32-bit
Kernel --- Darwin 8.8.5
Processor --- Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GHz, 1 GB RAM
The following test failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/modular/abvar/abvar.py
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 1, 1:03 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a quick note to catch the attention of those that can fix this.
>> There's some sort of bug in #249 that prevents me from loading or
>> attaching files containing definitions of some large lists. See the
>>
On Oct 1, 4:06 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 2:30 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi John,
>
> > > Mike: Any idea what is going on here?
>
> > I think it's a missing line
>
> > sag
On Oct 1, 2:30 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> > Mike: Any idea what is going on here?
>
> I think it's a missing line
>
> sage: from sage.calculus.calculus import is_SymbolicExpression
>
> in calculu
On Oct 1, 1:03 pm, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a quick note to catch the attention of those that can fix this.
> There's some sort of bug in #249 that prevents me from loading or
> attaching files containing definitions of some large lists. See the
> details athttp://trac.sage
On Oct 1, 12:30 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 1, 12:20 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
>
> Hi Jaap,
>
> > --
> > The following tests failed:
>
>
Just a quick note to catch the attention of those that can fix this.
There's some sort of bug in #249 that prevents me from loading or
attaching files containing definitions of some large lists. See the
details at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4232
When I reverse the patch at #249
On Oct 1, 12:20 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mabshoff wrote:
> On Fedora 9, 32 bits:
Hi Jaap,
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
> sage -t devel/s
On Sep 30, 3:23 pm, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [X ] Yes, include these in Sage
In total we had a whole lot of votes for inclusion (too lazt to count)
and none against it, so I consider this vote positive.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> alpha2 is out. It took a little longer and we ended up fixing some
> hard to track down bugs while waiting to merge some more spkgs. The
> highlight is likely the pynac.spkg - note that the actual library
> integration code is not merged yet, but will be in 3.1.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just tried the merge on sage math, but it still is having problems.
> Below is the output with a fresh build and clone of the main
> repository. Thanks,
>
> -Jon
> =)
>
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 9:46 PM, John H Palmieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The documentation on sagemath.org is now about 1 1/2 months old, and
> there have been several changes (including a major revision to the
> programming/developer's guide) made to the docs since then. Can it be
> update
On Oct 1, 8:35 am, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Georg,
> builds fine on Intel Mac OS X 10.4, this is what I get for make
> testlong:
>
> --
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t -long devel/
On Oct 1, 10:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On sagemath.org, cremona fails to build:
>
> 1.3.alpha2/local/include twoadic.cc -o twoadic_n.o
> g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include
> -DNTL_ALL -I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local
Hi,
On sagemath.org, cremona fails to build:
1.3.alpha2/local/include twoadic.cc -o twoadic_n.o
g++ -c -fPIC -g -O2 -DNEW_OP_ORDER -DUSE_PARI_FACTORING -I../include
-DNTL_ALL -I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local/include
-I/home2/sage/build/sage-3.1.3.alpha2/local/include descent.cc -o
d
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
> Snip...
>
>> temp2 := Derivative(temp[1],w) + Derivative(temp[2],x) +
>> Derivative(temp[3],y) + Derivative(temp[4],z);
>> ---
>> I get the funny error message:
>> ---
>> Loading
>> "/home/r1/kedlaya/.sage//temp/DWORK
>
Snip...
> temp2 := Derivative(temp[1],w) + Derivative(temp[2],x) +
> Derivative(temp[3],y) + Derivative(temp[4],z);
> ---
> I get the funny error message:
> ---
> Loading
> "/home/r1/kedlaya/.sage//temp/DWORK.MIT.EDU/5272//interface//tmp5272"
> ---
> but I think the calculation goes through. I'
Hi,
builds fine on Intel Mac OS X 10.4, this is what I get for make
testlong:
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py
When I try the following code in the Sage notebook (version 3.1.2):
---
%magma
polt := RationalFunctionField(Rationals());
R := PolynomialRing(polt, 4);
Q0 := w^3 + x^3 + y^3 + z^3;
Q := (w+x)*(w+2*y)*(w+3*z) + 3*x*y*(w+x+z);
Qt := Q0 + t*Q;
Qt_gradient := [Derivative(Qt, w), Derivative(Qt, x), De
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> The company redirects sagecalculus.com/.net/.org to the official web
> site for the Sage calculus textbook. sagecalculus.com will not be the
> company's web address nor will it redirect to the company's web site
> in the future.
With this gua
The company redirects sagecalculus.com/.net/.org to the official web
site for the Sage calculus textbook. sagecalculus.com will not be the
company's web address nor will it redirect to the company's web site
in the future.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> A company that I am the director of owns it.
I see potential for a conflict of interest there then. My understanding is
that this company's business is/will be to sell Sage accounts for hosted
notebooks. If that is indeed the case, then it
[X ] Yes, include these in Sage
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
U
A company that I am the director of owns it.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:13:39 -0400
>>
>> "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Could sagecalcu
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:13:39 -0400
>
> "Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Could sagecalculus.com be the official address? It currently redirects
> > to the current sage.math address. I'll change it to the sagemath.org
>
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:13:39 -0400
"Timothy Clemans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Could sagecalculus.com be the official address? It currently redirects
> to the current sage.math address. I'll change it to the sagemath.org
> one when the time comes.
Hi Timothy,
I forgot about your p
Successful build and only one doctest failure, calculus/all.py
deprecation warning, on here:
proc/version:
Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.27-smp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.2
20070115 (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:07:19 UTC 2008
/proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 1
vendor_id : Genui
Hi,
Could sagecalculus.com be the official address? It currently redirects
to the current sage.math address. I'll change it to the sagemath.org
one when the time comes.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Elliott,
>
> What is the time frame for putting
On Oct 1, 4:39 am, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I only had the same failures as Alex Ghitza, on an intel mac (10.5).
>
> M. Hampton
Ok, I cannot reproduce the problem with
sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/all.py
**
F
I only had the same failures as Alex Ghitza, on an intel mac (10.5).
M. Hampton
On Oct 1, 3:54 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two more things:
>
> a) the latest eclib.spkg is broken when we use 'export MAKE="make -
> j4"' - see #4228
>
> The issue here is a change to use ${MAKE} in th
Good points.
There are two kinds of use cases where I would want to calculate
things like
"sum(sqrt(p) for p in primes(1000))":
1. Just to have an idea what the result "value" is in RR, to some
accuracy.
2. Assume I have a complicated weird delicate expression of Gauss/
Kloosterman sums.
W
Two more things:
a) the latest eclib.spkg is broken when we use 'export MAKE="make -
j4"' - see #4228
The issue here is a change to use ${MAKE} in the makefile instead of a
hard coded make. The way we uses to invoke parallel make has really
bothered me and I would suggest that we introduce
$S
Hi Elliott,
What is the time frame for putting the final version of this on
sagemath.org?
Sage will be used in the introductory analysis course here at JKU,
Linz. It would be good to have the official address for this tutorial
fixed before pointing students to it.
Thanks.
Burcin
--~--~---
On Sep 30, 9:53 pm, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2008, at 21:08 , John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Please test and report issues as usual.
>
> > This probably is not specific to this build. I just used Software
> > Update on my Intel Mac to install "Java for Mac OS
On Sep 30, 10:47 pm, "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Built fine on 32-bit dell laptop running ubuntu. There are however four
> doctest failures:
>
> interfaces/magma.py
> calculus/all.py
> rings/number_field/order.py
> rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
>
> I've put a log wi
>
> Yep. And I'll remark again that
>
> sum(sqrt(p) for p in primes(1000))
>
> *better* work instantly no matter what we do, or I'm not
> happy with the plan. And you can't do the above as
> far as I can tell by constructing explicitly a number field
> of degree 2^168.
>
> William
Hmm thi
Dear Alex,
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:42:27 +1000
> From: "Alex Ghitza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Dear Paul and Andreas,
>
> Thanks for your help. I noticed the mpc webpage shortly after I wrote the
> initial email. It looks very promising, and since Sage already uses mpfr
> for its real
45 matches
Mail list logo
