Could someone who knows orders in number fields verify that they are
not at the moment unique parents and, if that is the desired
behaviour, explain why? I have a coercion error in ell_number_field
based on this.
{{{
sage: K. = NumberField(x^2 + 1, 'a')
sage: O1 = K.order([a, 1])
sage: O2
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 21:08 -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Jun 17, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
>
> > So, my conclusion is that we should be using branch instead of
> > clone as
> > the general development strategy with clone limited to those who are
> > working specific typ
On Jun 23, 5:01 pm, I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a compilation error for R when trying to compile 3.0.3.
> What I hope is the relevant piece of the installation log is below.
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks.--Rob
>
> Configuring R for OSX
> checking build system type... i
On Jun 17, 2008, at 4:13 PM, Glenn H Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> So, my conclusion is that we should be using branch instead of
> clone as
> the general development strategy with clone limited to those who are
> working specific types of problems and need to deal with it.
>
> All this leads to one of
Nick Alexander wrote:
>>> Did I miss a thread?
>> Yes, evidently. I'll track these discussions down when I have time
>> later today.
>
> If everyone else is satisfied, then I'm satisfied.
>
> +1
>
Maybe it would be good to have a wiki page that tracks a potential
package's discussion main
I'm with William. I was pretty happy when Francois reported (or more
precisely reminded me, since I think I knew and forgot) that xmaxima was
available. This means that openmath plotter (like jmol, but using tcl.tk
instead of java) is available too, whenever tcl/tk is installed.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 12:15 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 24, 12:00 pm, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2008/6/24 didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>
> Hi,
>
>> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> Did I miss a thread?
>
> Yes, evidently. I'll track these discussions down when I have time
> later today.
If everyone else is satisfied, then I'm satisfied.
+1
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Jun 24, 12:00 pm, "Arnaud Bergeron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/24 didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
Hi,
> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds
> >> building
2008/6/24 didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds building
>> xmaxima cause a problem?
>
> I'm sure it doesn't; the issue is that sage builds somet
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This is discussed at great length in the pages that I linked to
>
> I don't see any discussion of alternatives at http://
> pyprocessing.berlios.de/ and I certainly don't see any argument
> supporting pyprocessing ove
> This is discussed at great length in the pages that I linked to
I don't see any discussion of alternatives at http://
pyprocessing.berlios.de/ and I certainly don't see any argument
supporting pyprocessing over any alternative with direct reference to
Sage. Where is that?
And where is th
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:35 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMA
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:35 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobo
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Gary Furnish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I already gave this a verbal +1, but does anyone know what happens if
> you fork a sage process with open pexpect interface?
I'm sure it's a problem that we'll have to address, and there are ways to
do so (e.g. in the f
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Michael Abshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds building
> xmaxima cause a problem?
I'm sure it doesn't; the issue is that sage builds something behind
your back, so you won't find it if you're not l
I already gave this a verbal +1, but does anyone know what happens if
you fork a sage process with open pexpect interface?
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:26 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Anyway, sinc
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>
>> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobody voted -1 or
>> had issues, I declare this package officially accepted.
>
> My onl
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:09 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobody voted -1 or
> had issues, I declare this package officially accepted.
My only suggestion would be to use the version that will be used for
inclusion into python it
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobody voted -1 or
>> had issues, I declare this package officially accepted.
>
> -1! That was fast.
It was a full 3 days.
> What happened to the inclusion procedure
> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobody voted -1 or
> had issues, I declare this package officially accepted.
-1! That was fast.
What happened to the inclusion procedures? In particular, I am
interested to know what other options were investigated and why
pyprocessing is co
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 22, 10:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So please vote for or against this proposal, or raise questions, etc.
>
> +1 from me, too.
>
> Just one question, there is a section in the documentati
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.0.4.alpha0. This is supposed to be a quick release,
> so let's try to keep this simple. We do have quite a number of
> blockers that are open, so let's watch out for rc0 soon. As usual
> please report build issues and doctest failures. Note tha
On Jun 23, 10:24 pm, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 23, 5:08 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > any chance you have Fink or MacPorts installed?
>
> I had fink installed years ago, but it's not in my path any longer.
> Did it leave something around that's causing this problem?
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Michael Abshoff wrote:
>
> I am not sure if there is any harm if Maxima builds it. When woulds
> building xmaxima cause a problem?
>
No harm, I cannot imagine how I could be harmful in fact.
More like a small waste of ressources and an unintended side-effect. Just my
reactio
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Francois,
>
> I just found out that I have xmaxima in my $SAGE_LOCAL/bin folder.
> I am pretty sure no one ordered that. It seems that it will build by
> default
> if the configure script finds tk. Actually I had a look at
On 23 Jun, 14:33, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.0.4.alpha0. This is supposed to be a quick release,
> so let's try to keep this simple. We do have quite a number of
> blockers that are open, so let's watch out for rc0 soon. As usual
> please report build
mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> here goes Sage 3.0.4.alpha0. This is supposed to be a quick release,
> so let's try to keep this simple. We do have quite a number of
> blockers that are open, so let's watch out for rc0 soon. As usual
> please report build issues and doctest failures. Note that
All passed here:
Linux version 2.6.18.8-0.3-default ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Apr 17 08:42:35
UTC 2007
John
2008/6/24 mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> All tests passed on my intel mac running os x 10.4.11.
>
> -M. Hampton
>
> On Jun 2
Hello,
Since http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org physically is on
sage.math.washington.edu and http://www.newsynthesis.org/ actually seems
not to be down. Could somebody with enough rights and knowledge please
check what the problem could be.
Thank you.
Ralf
--~--~-~--~~-
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just found out that I have xmaxima in my $SAGE_LOCAL/bin folder.
> > I am pretty sure no one ordered that. It seems that it will build by
> > default
> > if the configure script
31 matches
Mail list logo
