On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anyway, since every single person voted +1 and nobody voted -1 or >> had issues, I declare this package officially accepted. > > -1! That was fast.
It was a full 3 days. > What happened to the inclusion procedures? > In particular, I am > interested to know what other options were investigated and why > pyprocessing is considered the best possible solution right now. > This is discussed at great length in the pages that I linked to, since pyprocessing passed the inclusion procedure for inclusion in standard Python already. Please read thinks at the top of this thread. I'll reopen the voting for two more days. -- William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
