Thanks to Robert Bradshaw's tremendous help, we have the start of a
QEPCAD spkg for linux posted at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/772
The spkg does not include source because we haven't sorted out licensing
issues. However, it does use wget to get the source from the webpage,
so
Robert wrote:
> I ran into an error compiling
> Log4j12, any ideas. (I've been busy at the conference the last couple
> of days, but could look more into this maybe when I get home).
I discovered that this was caused by a jar file I didn't know I had in
my classplath. I am in the process of cre
Hi,
Sage 2.10.alpha1 has been release. I guess the highlight is the
Pentium M takes forever to compile fix by Paul Zimmermann. Josh
and I also updated numpy and there was a whole bunch of patches
that fix some long standing issues. More details are below.
Tarball [197MB] is at
http://sage.math.
Howdy,
On Jan 8, 2008 10:43 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, the culprit points to a cleanup function of m4ri, which under
> normal conditions is called only once. I am not seeing the above issue
> under valgrdind with "pure" Sage 2.10.alpha0, but as I just learned
> yesterday probl
On Jan 9, 4:28 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sage 2.10.alpha0 contains an updated FLINT release. As per usual I
> forced to run make check and the following happened in 64 bit mode
> with gcc 4.2.2 on Itanium:
>
> Testing _fmpz_poly_mul_KS()... GNU MP: Cannot r
On Jan 9, 8:34 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When using the optional package 'gap_packages-4.4.10_2.spkg',
> if I do
>
> mv gap_packages-4.4.10_2.spkg gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar.bz2
> bunzip2 gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar.bz2
> tar xf gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar
>
> then I get
>
> tar:
Tom wrote:
> The clicking & dragging interface is *painful*. I can't see using that for
> anything more than a few symbols.
I agree, the interface is not very usable. On the plus side, however,
the application's core looks solid and the project looks fairly
active:
0.6.2 Notes (2007-
The clicking & dragging interface is *painful*. I can't see using that for
anything more than a few symbols.
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Tom wrote:
>
>> Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, and added standard
>> scalable development concepts to accelerate th
It worked for me, and seems nice for what it does.
On Jan 9, 7:49 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 4:53 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 10, 2008 1:12 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Justi
Ted,
Thanks, this looks like a lot of work! I ran into an error compiling
Log4j12, any ideas. (I've been busy at the conference the last couple
of days, but could look more into this maybe when I get home).
- Robert
On Jan 6, 2008, at 9:30 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Robert,
>
> The jmol-11.
Justin wrote:
> In addition, it appears only some of the components
> of the equation are editable (in "X+Y", I can select and change "X"
> and "Y", but not "+"?),
Double click on the operator to select it and then select a
replacement operator from the pallet.
>and navigating between these "
On Jan 10, 2008 1:12 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Tom wrote:
> > >
> > >> Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, an
On Jan 9, 2008, at 4:12 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
[snip]
> Since we're comparing Java to Javascript for the purposes of an
> equation editor,
> I did a quick google search and f
Justin wrote:
> Roughly the same behavior:
It looks like this is a known issue:
"
According to Apple specs OS X 10.5 Leopard already runs the newer
Version (J2SE 1.5.0_13 and 1.4.2_16),. However, Tiger and Leopard use
different build numbers, so problem seems limited to Tiger 10.4.10 and
.11,
On Jan 9, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Justin wrote:
>
>> Sorry; I should have noted the version installed here. I installed
>> this last month, so that's not the issue.
>
> Does this code work? It is the standard GUI widget demo that is
> distributed with the Java development kit:
>
On Jan 9, 2008 2:35 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> >
> > Tom wrote:
> >
> >> Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, and
> >> added standard scalable development concepts to accelerate the
> >> synergy of th
Justin wrote:
> Sorry; I should have noted the version installed here. I installed
> this last month, so that's not the issue.
Does this code work? It is the standard GUI widget demo that is
distributed with the Java development kit:
#GUI widgets.
html('http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/tk
On Jan 9, 2008, at 3:33 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Justin wrote:
>
>> Maybe it's just that my system senses my inate hostility to Java, but
>> this doesn't seem to work well for me (Mac OS X, 10.4.11, Safari 3
>> Public Beta, whatever version of Java I have).
>>
>> I pasted the above snippit into
Justin wrote:
> Maybe it's just that my system senses my inate hostility to Java, but
> this doesn't seem to work well for me (Mac OS X, 10.4.11, Safari 3
> Public Beta, whatever version of Java I have).
>
> I pasted the above snippit into the notebook, and evaluated it,
> giving me a sort of Jav
On Jan 9, 10:39 pm, VictorMiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried downloading sage-2.9.3 and building it on my system
> (value of uname -a is below):
>
> Linux runner 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:17:24 EDT 2007
> i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> I got an error. As requested, I'm
I just tried downloading sage-2.9.3 and building it on my system
(value of uname -a is below):
Linux runner 2.6.9-55.0.9.ELsmp #1 SMP Tue Sep 25 02:17:24 EDT 2007
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
I got an error. As requested, I'm posting the relevant lines.
Victor
sage-spkg cython-0.9.6.9 2>&1
cython
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:43 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Tom wrote:
>
>> Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, and
>> added standard scalable development concepts to accelerate the
>> synergy of the web service protocols you've proposed.
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/hom
Elliptic curve isomorphism code only works when the characteristic is
not 2 or 3. I expect to submit a patch shortly. See note added to
trac #740.
John
--
John Cremona
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To uns
Quite fancy, but the thing took about 1 Minute to load on my Kubuntu
machine, and Firefox was frozen in the meantime!!!
Yes, that's right, it's Java ;)
But it sure could be one possible way to go. (I must say I like the AJAX
stuff more, although I really have NO CLUE at all about web programming...
When using the optional package 'gap_packages-4.4.10_2.spkg',
if I do
mv gap_packages-4.4.10_2.spkg gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar.bz2
bunzip2 gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar.bz2
tar xf gap_packages-4.4.10_2.tar
then I get
tar: gap_packages-4.4.10_2/src/ctbllib/doc: implausibly old time stamp
1969
Tom wrote:
> Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, and added standard
> scalable development concepts to accelerate the synergy of the web service
> protocols you've proposed.
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/web_service_architecture_joke.png
>
> (tongue firm
boothby wrote
>I'd really prefer people to help out with the notebook, since
homework already keeps me.
>stretched thin, and I'd rather be writing more mathematical code.
But hey, y'all are volunteers -- do what you want.
I am about 1/3 of the way through the O'Reilly JavaScript book and I
think
Michael,
> I found the same bug on an Itanium also with gcc 4.2.2. See
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/t/a05734c584f012b
Sorry, missed that.
> Another question: I assume we can
> closehttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1277
> since those two issues you reported there have
On Jan 9, 5:15 pm, Kate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael,
Hi Kate,
> Sage-2.10.alpha0 builds from source (using gcc-4.2.2)
> fine for me on
>
> x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
> x86_64-Linux (opteron-fc6)
>
> but fails on ia64-Linux (RH Linux) in flint-1.05 with
>
> Testing _fmpz_poly_mul_kar
Michael,
Sage-2.10.alpha0 builds from source (using gcc-4.2.2)
fine for me on
x86-Linux (pentium4-fc6)
x86_64-Linux (opteron-fc6)
but fails on ia64-Linux (RH Linux) in flint-1.05 with
Testing _fmpz_poly_mul_karatsuba()... ok
Testing _fmpz_poly_mul_karatsuba_trunc()... ok
Testing _fmpz_poly
On Jan 9, 4:35 pm, Alexander Dreyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,> Ok, I send the patch to Michael B. today off list, but I
> hadn't heard
> > back yet.
>
> I already incorporated the patch from the trac. In fact, I've
> rewritten it a little bit, since HOME and LD_LIBRARY_PATH cou
On Jan 7, 1:10 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hello Singular team,
>
> we came across two bugs and the gcc 4.3 compilation issue in the
> latest Singular code basis that we ship with Sage 2.9.3.
>
> The first bug is #1703: one mpz is leaked in longrat.cc triggered by
> lin
Hi everybody,
> Ok, I send the patch to Michael B. today off list, but I hadn't heard
> back yet.
I already incorporated the patch from the trac. In fact, I've
rewritten it a little bit, since HOME and LD_LIBRARY_PATH could be
treated likewise, see:
http://polybori.cvs.sourceforge.net/polybori/Pol
On Jan 9, 6:52 am, "Ted Kosan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of separating the Sage computation engine from the notebook
> server looks interesting.
That's very nice, yes. Especially then there could be different
interfaces (third party ...). If somebody likes Java, no problem -- or
re
-- Forwarded message --
From: Adam Getchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jan 8, 2008 11:24 AM
Subject: Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 2.9 VMWare image released
To: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I just uploaded vmware-sage-deluxe-2.9.3.7z to my home directory on
sage.math. It's slig
Excellent idea, Ted. I took your idea, expanded upon it, and added standard
scalable development concepts to accelerate the synergy of the web service
protocols you've proposed.
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/web_service_architecture_joke.png
(tongue firmly in cheek)
On Wed, 9
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/1732
On Jan 8, 2008, at 4:27 AM, vgermrk wrote:
>
> Is there a way to construct block matrices in SAGE?
> Not just the "block_sum", "augment" and "stack" functions.
>
> As an example, let A, B, C, D be matrices and i want to construct a
> matrix like E=[[A,B]
On 9 Jan., 08:25, "Mike Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It was my impression that he didn't want a matrix with matrix entries,
> but instead wanted the matrix whose entries were given by the entries
> of the submatrices.
>
> --Mike
That's right. I should make myself more clearer next time.
-
38 matches
Mail list logo
