On Jan 9, 4:35 pm, Alexander Dreyer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everybody,> Ok, I send the patch to Michael B. today off list, but I
> hadn't heard
> > back yet.
>
> I already incorporated the patch from the trac. In fact, I've
> rewritten it a little bit, since HOME and LD_LIBRARY_PATH could be
> treated likewise,
> see:http://polybori.cvs.sourceforge.net/polybori/PolyBoRi/SConstruct?r1=1...
>
> > I also think that that fix is a potential solution for the
> > Itanium issue that William reported since at least on the box I am
> > currently playing with a gcc 3.2 gets picked and that doesn't end too
> > well as you can imagine.
>
> Yeah, standalone-PolyBoRi works on Itanium, but for compiling SAGE,
> one needs a newer compiler (I have the same problem on the Itanium box
> here, but didn't succeed in compiling SAGE yet).
Ok, I am having similar problems and while I solved most of the
compilation issues I also have some linker issue at startup to solve.
William just send me an email that he never got Sage to work on that
box, so it might be a while before I get this to work.
> Best regards,
> Alexander
> PS: Feel free to post these issues and patches directely to the
> PolyBoRi-Tracker:http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=210499
Ok, I bookmarked it and will post issues I see there, too.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
