Yeah, I still don't understand why that test failed/aborted, even so.
But I've made the changes to the code. It's not a serious issue, since
it is only the test code, so there's no need for SAGE to update FLINT
in a hurry. I'll issue a patch some time over the next few days or so.
Thanks for doin
On Dec 24, 2007, at 7:40 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>
> I did find some occurrences of 63 instead of FLINT_BITS-1, but I don't
> believe this should be causing any problems with that function.
>
> Since the function doesn't say fail, I can only imagine this is an out
> of memory problem. But I don't s
On Dec 24, 2007 5:40 PM, Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William, give this a try. It's all I have time for today, but it gives
> you some sense of Jmol's capability.
>
> http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/examples-11/math.htm
>
I'm rather busy because it is Christmas eve. Just some
I did find some occurrences of 63 instead of FLINT_BITS-1, but I don't
believe this should be causing any problems with that function.
Since the function doesn't say fail, I can only imagine this is an out
of memory problem. But I don't see any leaks, nor any requests for
large blocks.
Can you t
very good news from the jmol project leader - see below
- William
(Sent from my iPhone.)
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: December 24, 2007 4:19:58 PM MST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol and Mathematics Visualization
> Reply-T
William Stein wrote:
> happen to us, please speak up. I think something like JSAGE
> (http://sagemath.org/jsage/)
> -- if it were to take off -- would really help.
>
Ok, for a start: In December last year there was an article in one
of the oldest math journals in the world: Nieuw Archief voor
>I just noticed this email on the jmol developer mailing list. See below.
>
>if anybody has any thoughts or ideas -- long or short term -- about how to
>structure or restructure sage development so the same sort of thing doesn't
>happen to us, please speak up. I think something like JSAGE
>(htt
Also, the "Legal questions" section of http://omath.org/wiki/Main_Page
might be worth reading before you get started.
On Dec 24, 2007 7:20 PM, root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ondrej
>
> >I am thinking for a long time already of writing an interpreter, in
> >Python of course, of the Mathemati
Ondrej
>I am thinking for a long time already of writing an interpreter, in
>Python of course, of the Mathematica
>language:
Such a language interpreter exists already, called MockMMA, I believe.
Check with Richard Fateman.
Tim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
From a social point of view, I think this would be a great idea.
However, Mathematica contains many functions that have no equivalent
in Sage. You might find yourself re-implementing Mathematica from
scratch.
-David
On Dec 24, 5:15 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am th
Hi,
I am thinking for a long time already of writing an interpreter, in
Python of course, of the Mathematica
language:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=161
that would call Sage (or SymPy) as a backend to do the actual
calculations. People would
just take their Mathematica code, a
> > But I am not really looking into speeding up this particular code, but
> > just finding ways what people
> > use and are going to use. Fortran will definitely not die (at least
> > not soon),
>
> I consider that unlikely to happen, but I certainly won't be sad when
> the use of Fortran were to
Hi Ondrej,
On Dec 24, 10:37 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am quite shocked that g77 is that far ahead on the performance
> > curve. I am sure I would have heard about it by now if that was the
> > general case, but is there any chance your code might hit some corner
> > ca
> I am quite shocked that g77 is that far ahead on the performance
> curve. I am sure I would have heard about it by now if that was the
> general case, but is there any chance your code might hit some corner
> case in gfortran? Which gfortran did you use exactly? Does using g95
$ gfortran --vers
On Dec 23, 1:57 pm, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> So, what do you think of that?
I am quite shocked that g77 is that far ahead on the performance
curve. I am sure I would have heard about it by now if that was the
general case, but is there any chance your code might hit
On Dec 24, 9:03 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 12:53 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
> > Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
> > it's quite
On Dec 24, 2007 1:26 PM, Joseph North <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2007 12:50 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Download the source code from:
> > http://sagemath.org/dist/src/i
I mean
http://sagemath.org/dist/src/
> Dear Dr. Stein:
>Is your release frequency
Hello Jmol-Devel,
I'm the project directory of Sage (http://sagemath.org), an open
source mathematics software project,
which -- among other things -- has a web-browser based graphical
interface. See screenshots here:
http://sagemath.org/screen_shots/
After searching for a long time for a go
On Dec 24, 2007 12:53 PM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
> Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
> it's quite time-consuming?
>
Ok, I'm repositing 2.9.1 with the flint test off.
-- Wil
Hi,
I just noticed this email on the jmol developer mailing list. See below.
if anybody has any thoughts or ideas -- long or short term -- about how to
structure or restructure sage development so the same sort of thing doesn't
happen to us, please speak up. I think something like JSAGE
(http
When I upgrade from 2.9 to 2.9.1, the FLINT test suite is being run.
Probably it's a good idea to disable this in the release versions,
it's quite time-consuming?
Also I noticed this during the test suite (mac os 10.4.10, ppc g5):
[...]
Testing fmpz_convert()... ok
Testing fmpz_size()... ok
I don't think anybody should care about the signs. Given the close
connection between continued fractions and Euclid's algorithm (which
does guarantee minimality), I guess you could try and see what signs
would be given back by a continued fractions approach.
It actually looks like they had a ver
Hi,
SAGE-2.9.1 has been released.
See
http://sagemath.org/announce/sage-2.9.1.txt
for the release notes (which I've copied below).
Download the source code from:
http://sagemath.org/dist/src/i
Binaries will be available in a day or two.
William
Hi,
I think the one current thing holding up SAGE-2.9.1 is that Martin's
separation of m4ri out of the sage core library
is unfortunately completely broken on all flavors of OS X. Any call
to it segfaults. E.g.,
sage: span(GF(2), [[1,2,3], [2,2,2], [1,2,5]])
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACC
On Dec 24, 2007 2:16 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Dec 24, 4:38 am, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > - William
> >
> > (Sent from my iPhone.)
> >
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > > From: David Nordquest
> > > Date: December 23, 2007 8:30:19 PM MST
> > > To: [EM
On Dec 24, 4:38 am, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - William
>
> (Sent from my iPhone.)
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> > From: David Nordquest
> > Date: December 23, 2007 8:30:19 PM MST
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: SELinux Problems
>
> > On my CENTOS 5 system, I found the
26 matches
Mail list logo
