very good news from the jmol project leader - see below

- William

(Sent from my iPhone.)

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Bob Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: December 24, 2007 4:19:58 PM MST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol and Mathematics Visualization
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

> Dear William,
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hello Jmol-Devel,
>>
>> I'm the project directory of Sage (http://sagemath.org), an open
>> source mathematics software project,
>> which -- among other things -- has a web-browser based graphical
>> interface.  See screenshots here:
>>
>> http://sagemath.org/screen_shots/
>>
>> After searching for a long time for a good open source option for 3d
>> *interactive* graphics embedded
>> in the Sage  notebook it seems that jmol is -- oddly enough -- the
>> best option, even though you guys
>> designed it for chemistry.
>>
> Oh, I am not surprised. Jmol has some very nice capabilities that have
> nothing to do with chemistry. We are delighted to see this expanded  
> use.
>
>
>> We've been adapting it for doing general
>> mathematical visualization, and
>> just included it standard in sage-2.9.1, which was released today.
>>
>>
>>
> I would be very interested in hearing about some of your adaptations.
>
>> 1. What is the relation between javaview and jmol?
>>
>>
> what is javaview? --OK (see below)
>
>> 2. What is the relation between java3d and jmol?
>>
>>
> jmol uses no java3d. See http://jmol.sourceforge.net/technotes/  
> (maybe a
> bit out of date -- it's a bit more complicated than that now, since we
> have Maya, VMRL, and PovRAY exporters)
>
>> 3. Are you aware of jmol being used for applications outside of
>> chemistry? E.g., applications
>>     to general mathematical visualization?
>>
>>
> I am not
>
>> 4. Do you have any advice as to how jmol could be best used for  
>> more general
>>    mathematical visualization?    We can use/abuse the existing
>> molecular modeling
>>    interface, but perhaps we should somehow coordinate with you and  
>> modify
>>    jmol itself to have more general functionality?
>>
>>
> I would love to collaborate with you on this, either to incorporate
> generally useful mathematical functionality or help you develop a
> "JmolMath" adaptation. Isosurfaces in particular have been worked on
> quite a bit, and you can map f(x,y) at least onto an isosurface  
> directly.
>
> One of the nice aspects of how Jmol is set up is that we can now add
> functionality with virtually no expense to general users. The
> functionality is all modularized into separate Jar files so that only
> that functionality that is used is loaded. You get a basic package,  
> then
> only if you use biomolecular systems, for example, does the browser
> download those. If you create math-related functionality, we can add  
> it
> in that way as well.
>
>
>> 5. Viewing examples here:
>>       http://www.javaview.de/demo/index.html
>>    Do you think we can do as good -- or better -- then they do, but
>> using jmol?
>>
>>
>>
> I don't see anything at http://sagemath.org/screen_shots/misc/ that
> couldn't be done today in Jmol. One thing we don't have is nice
> graphical axis rendering. But that should be pretty easy to implement.
> All the surfaces would be no problem. You would want to add a
> calculation engine that runs the mathematical calculation and creates
> either the isosurface itself or a scalar field that can be used to
> generate an isosurface based on it.
>
> The demo animations at javaview's site could be more involved, but  
> that
> just means they would be an interesting challenge.
> Objects such as I see at http://www.javaview.de/demo/ 
> PaParmSurface.html
> would look WAY better in Jmol, because you wouldn't have them be so
> grainy. We can run 100s of thousands of triangles with almost no delay
> in real-time rotations.
>
> I think the hardest part would be the translation of a string like
> "2./(1.+(u*sin(v))^2)*sqrt(1.+u*u)*sin(v)*cos(u-atan(u))" into real
> math. But maybe that's not a big deal for you.
>
> Bob Hanson
>
>
> -- 
> Robert M. Hanson
> Professor of Chemistry
> St. Olaf College
> Northfield, MN
> http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
>
>
> If nature does not answer first what we want,
> it is better to take what answer we get.
>
> -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900
>
>
>
> --- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to