Hi everybody,
build succeeds on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5148 @ 2.33GHz running SLES
10 64Bit (SuSE 10.1 + full patches)
[...]
scons: done building targets.
Done installing PolyBoRi.
real3m32.929s
user2m49.039s
sys 0m17.821s
Successfully installed polybori-0.1-r4
Best regards,
Ale
Wednesday 05 December 2007 06:07:03 mabshoff yazmıştı:
> gmp:
[...]
> * uncomment std::FILE -> causes trouble - need clean fix
See attached patch.
Regards,
ismail
--
Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Hi, all,
On Dec 4, 2007, at 20:07 , mabshoff wrote:
[snip]
> Those are all cause by mwrank. The issue seems to be the same issue as
> Justin Walker reported in the 2.8.15 thread in sage-support.
> Interestingly nobody ever reported it and I now finally have a
> testcase that also produces the is
>> The Sage notebook hasn't gone much of anywhere during the last 5 months
>> only because the main developers of it (i.e., me, Alex Clemesha and
>> Bobby Moretti)
>> have been working on other projects, and nobody has taken over. Alex has
>> created his own completely new variant (something like
Hello,
it took a while, but I managed to compile all of Sage 2.8.15 with gcc
4.3.0 20071130 (experimental). Thanks to Carl Witty who gave me a
couple pointers it happened much more smoothly than I had expected.
Also thanks to cartman who fixed the LinBox gcc 4.3 issue that I
should have fixed a m
On Dec 4, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On with the bug reports:
> - When I run the applet, I get a scary number of requests for
> "trust", including some "identification required" dialogue boxes (on
> fedora 7) that supply no information whatsoever. It feels like signing
> a blank chequ
Probably too late, but maybe this will help.
On thing I did that may have caused this is change branches on one
terminal while doing a maketest in another window.
I haven't moved sage root since install, so I don't know how relevant
#1358 is.
1. Tried to install cremona, ran into the same probl
On with the bug reports:
- When I run the applet, I get a scary number of requests for
"trust", including some "identification required" dialogue boxes (on
fedora 7) that supply no information whatsoever. It feels like signing
a blank cheque. These are the kinds of dialogues that students should
On Dec 4, 2007 5:23 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> My solution to this problem is to simply bundle a copy of the desired
> version of JavaSE, with the desired version of Java3D already
> installed in it, with the application. The app is then tested against
> this configuration
Justin wrote:
> > My thought here is that I am unsure if Apple allows their Java
> > implementation to be freely distributed.
>
> Why do you want to do that? Doesn't Java "come with"? If you want
> to use a specific version with your app, that might present problems
> of its own (bringing a 10.
William Stein wrote:
> The Sage notebook hasn't gone much of anywhere during the last 5 months
> only because the main developers of it (i.e., me, Alex Clemesha and
> Bobby Moretti)
> have been working on other projects, and nobody has taken over. Alex has
> created his own completely new varian
On Dec 4, 2007, at 12:15 PM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
> Robert wrote:
>
>> I don't know that it would be any harder for the Mac--usually there's
>> less of a need for an actual installer. However, in practice Java is
>> fairly compatible platform-to-platform, and most computers already
>> have it.
>
>
On Dec 3, 10:33 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Actually, that is the point of gluegen-rt.jar--it lets one ship
> native code (so/dll/dylib) libraries within the jars themselves, and
> why there has to be singed code involved. Does the 4x4 applet still
> work for you if you unins
On Dec 4, 2007 11:02 AM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 1:57 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > Perhaps the exact_log function of Integer might help (though it
> > rounds down)?
> >
> > sage: a = 17
> > sage: a.exact_log(2)
> > 4
>
> Thanks
On Dec 4, 2007 12:15 PM, Ted Kosan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Robert wrote:
>
> > I don't know that it would be any harder for the Mac--usually there's
> > less of a need for an actual installer. However, in practice Java is
> > fairly compatible platform-to-platform, and most computers alread
Robert wrote:
> I don't know that it would be any harder for the Mac--usually there's
> less of a need for an actual installer. However, in practice Java is
> fairly compatible platform-to-platform, and most computers already
> have it.
My thought here is that I am unsure if Apple allows their J
On Dec 4, 8:30 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if this is specific to my current install, but I thought
> it could be useful to someone. Also, I'm not noticing any problems
> resulting from this. During upgrade from 2.8.14 on Intel OS X 10.5.1:
>
> g++ -fPIC -shared -
On Dec 4, 8:30 pm, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if this is specific to my current install, but I thought
> it could be useful to someone. Also, I'm not noticing any problems
> resulting from this. During upgrade from 2.8.14 on Intel OS X 10.5.1:
I did fix some issue w
I don't know if this is specific to my current install, but I thought
it could be useful to someone. Also, I'm not noticing any problems
resulting from this. During upgrade from 2.8.14 on Intel OS X 10.5.1:
g++ -fPIC -shared -o libntl.so FFT.o FacVec.o GF2.o GF2E.o GF2EX.o
GF2EXFactoring.o GF2X.o
> > Hey, it failed for me :-) on ubuntu 32-bit linux:
>
> I removed the pushd and popd, apparently they are bashisms.
>
> Here is the new package:
>
> http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori-0.1-r4.spkg
I've updated the package on sagemath.org; I then did
install_package('
On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
> Robert wrote:
>
>> Actually, that is the point of gluegen-rt.jar--it lets one ship
>> native code (so/dll/dylib) libraries within the jars themselves, and
>> why there has to be singed code involved. Does the 4x4 applet still
>> work for you if you
On Dec 4, 2007 1:57 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Perhaps the exact_log function of Integer might help (though it
> rounds down)?
>
> sage: a = 17
> sage: a.exact_log(2)
> 4
Thanks very much; even though I made the original post in confusion, I
had been wondering how to
Please ignore this post; it's from a completely different mailing list
(about Haskell).
Catching up on weeks of unread mail from different mailing lists has
apparently left me quite confused.
Steve
On Dec 4, 2007 1:54 PM, Stephen Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 1:08 PM, Davi
On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:54 AM, Stephen Forrest wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 1:08 PM, David Benbennick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2007 9:21 AM, Steven Fodstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> For the index, how about this:
>>>
>>> truncate . (/(log 2)) . log . fromIntegral
>>
>> That will no
http://www.risc.uni-linz.ac.at/people/berocal/sage/polybori_wrapper-20071204.hg
Note that this is for comments and testing only, and is not at all
complete. I know one way of crashing it, try to use BooleSet iterators.
Comments, suggestions and patches very welcome. (But
On Dec 4, 2007 1:08 PM, David Benbennick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 9:21 AM, Steven Fodstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For the index, how about this:
> >
> > truncate . (/(log 2)) . log . fromIntegral
>
> That will not work. It will convert the Integer to Double, which will
On Dec 4, 2007, at 10:46 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
I spent a lot of time writing the java3d stuff for Sage this
summer,
but haven't had a chance to work on it much since then. I
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> I spent a lot of time writing the java3d stuff for Sage this summer,
>>> but haven't had a chance to work on it much since then. I am hoping
>>> to get back to it a bit this Christmas break (co
On Dec 4, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> I spent a lot of time writing the java3d stuff for Sage this summer,
>> but haven't had a chance to work on it much since then. I am hoping
>> to get back to it a bit this Christmas break (coming up in a week for
>> me). I
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello,
>
Hello,
>> Mike, could you point me to your code?
>
> I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
> does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
>
>> I actually wonder why you would
>> reprogram it in Sage and not interfacing the aldor-combinat l
Robert wrote:
> Actually, that is the point of gluegen-rt.jar--it lets one ship
> native code (so/dll/dylib) libraries within the jars themselves, and
> why there has to be singed code involved. Does the 4x4 applet still
> work for you if you uninstall java3d?
>
> > Given that people already have
> > Mike, could you point me to your code?
>
> I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
> does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
Just for clarification, the code that I posted above is just some very
preliminary experimentation I had been doing on my own machine. It
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:40:52 -0800
"William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 4, 2007 8:35 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > William Stein wrote:
> > > Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just
> > > added it to the optional package list). It woul
Hello,
> Mike, could you point me to your code?
I've attached the _very_ rough version I started awhile back. It just
does FormalPowerSeries and DataStream.
> I actually wonder why you would
> reprogram it in Sage and not interfacing the aldor-combinat library?
> Is there a problem with the lic
On 4-Dec-07, at 8:43 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:30:39 -0800 (PST)
> mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>> Could Burcin post a link to his patch bundle that provides library
>>> support for PolyBoRi for Sage in this thread, so we can all try
>>> it out?
Worked for
Thanks Ismail for the report.
The latest svn version of linbox is now fixed.
Clement
ismail dönmez a écrit :
>Hi all,
>
>I applied attached patch to Linbox 1.1.4 tarball and I was able to
>build & pass regression tests with gcc 4.3 trunk.
>
>Regards,
>ismail
>
>>
>
>
>
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 08:30:39 -0800 (PST)
mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could Burcin post a link to his patch bundle that provides library
> > support for PolyBoRi for Sage in this thread, so we can all try
> > it out?
>
> Yep, that should happen ASAP.
OK, until I update to 2.8.15, mer
On Dec 4, 2007 8:35 AM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
> >
> > Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just added
> > it to the optional package list). It would be good if everybody
> > reading this with interest in polybori and some cycles to s
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I spent a lot of time writing the java3d stuff for Sage this summer,
> but haven't had a chance to work on it much since then. I am hoping
> to get back to it a bit this Christmas break (coming up in a week for
> me). I'm excited to see the sudden interest in this.
>
William Stein wrote:
>
> Regarding PolyBoRi, (1) it is now an optional package (I just added
> it to the optional package list). It would be good if everybody
> reading this with interest in polybori and some cycles to spare
> could type
> sage: install_package('polybori-0.1-r3')
> and rep
On Dec 4, 4:58 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 6:54 AM, mabshoff
>
>
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
>
> > > Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello Sage-Devel,
Robert Miller has been hired by University of Washington (not by me)
to be the first "Sage GSA" -- SAGE Graduate Student Assistant.
Here's the official job description for the position below. The point
of this email s that if you're at a university and an opportunity for someth
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> On 11/30/2007 03:13 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I've been spending a bit of time with symmetric functions recently.
>> In the near future, I'll be making a commit that adds support for
>> Hall-Littlewood, Macdonald polynomials, and quasisymmetric functions.
>>
Hi all,
I applied attached patch to Linbox 1.1.4 tarball and I was able to
build & pass regression tests with gcc 4.3 trunk.
Regards,
ismail
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Dec 4, 2007 6:54 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
> >
> > Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface
On 11/30/2007 03:13 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> I've been spending a bit of time with symmetric functions recently.
> In the near future, I'll be making a commit that adds support for
> Hall-Littlewood, Macdonald polynomials, and quasisymmetric functions.
> Other stuff that will need to
On Dec 4, 3:32 pm, Burcin Erocal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
>
> Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
> > built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2
Hello,
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 01:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Alexander Dreyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
> built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2.33GHz
> (using one cpu only). I'll try to find the corresponding scons
>
The GCD is used in the first stage of any factoring algorithm, to find
the content (GCD of all the coefficients) and to factor into
squarefree factors (using GCD(f, f') where f' is the derivative).
But your example is special. The example you give can be factored by
hand in 5 minutes because ther
On Dec 4, 2007, at 5:09 AM, fwc wrote:
>>> 1) Taylor series of a rational function.
>>
>>> This works:
>>> sage: cos(x).taylor(x,0,2)
>>
>>> This doesn't:
>>> sage: x/(1+x).taylor(x,0,2)
>>
>>> This is very confusing:
>
>> This is due to the fact that '.' binds tighter than '/'. For
>> examp
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 02:31, William Stein wrote:
> > I think we discussed this on the list before. For univariate you want
> > van hoeij's algorithm and for multivariate some variant of GCDHEU or
> > EZGCD.
> >
> > I think the algorithm Singular are using, EZGCD, is probably pretty
> > good
On 28 Nov., 02:01, "Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/27/07, mabshoff wrote:
> > ...
> > Since there seem to be at least 3 or 4 people interested in Sage
> > onSolarisI am willing to roll up some binaries, at least for Sparc
> > and maybe later for Intel. Let me know if you are interes
Good point! I am confusing the two issues somewhat.
The confusion arises in that there is an EZ-GCD and an EZ
factorisation algorithm, and EEZ-GCD and an EEZ factorisation
algorithm. In fact Magma uses a variant of the latter to factor
multivariate polynomials. The EEZ-GCD algorithm was derived b
Hello again,
The essential part of PolyBoRi (using the built-ininterface) can be
built in about 3 minutes on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5148 @ 2.33GHz
(using one cpu only). I'll try to find the corresponding scons
commands for the spkg and the Sage-wrapper and give to to Burcin.
Best regards,
Alexa
Hi anybody,
> it might be true that more users care about R but what if a minority really
> really pushes for PolyBoRi? ;-)
>
> In any case, I am BCC'ing this to Michael and Andreas maybe they have some
> wisdom to share how to cut the compile time of PolyBoRi.
Hm, is this really a problem? From
Yes, indeed Magma does this.
Bill.
On 4 Dec, 02:52, "Stephen Forrest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007 8:53 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 3 Dec, 17:15, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > This is not so good, really. We should be aiming to beat
> PolyBoRi should be a trivial-to-install optional package for a while before
> inclusion in standard Sage -- building PolyBoRi and R takes about the same
> time, and I think having R in every copy of Sage will be of interest to far
> more users.
Hi there,
it might be true that more users care
57 matches
Mail list logo
