On 10/27/07, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Round about calculus.py line 3283 is a really charming latex-ification
> algorithm. I have some questions about it. Could the if statement that puts
> the 'tails' into the subscript be moved into the latex_varify function?
>
> I'm also bot
Hello,
now that 2.8.10 has been released here are the plans for the next two
upcoming Sage releases:
- 2.8.11 to be released on November 2nd. The main goals for this
release are:
* it will be the basis for Sage Bug Day 5
* bug fixes and small features only
* we intent to make this compile
On 10/28/07, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sage 2.8.10 has been released. Download from
> http://sagemath.org/download.html or upgrade with "sage -upgrade", as
> usual.
>
> This release includes updated spkg's prepared by Robert Bradshaw and
> Carl Witty, and patches created by Carl W
On Oct 29, 7:13 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Sage 2.8.10 has been released. Download from
> >http://sagemath.org/download.htmlor upgrade with "sage -upgrade", as
> > usual.
>
> > This release includes updated spkg'
Sage 2.8.10 has been released. Download from
http://sagemath.org/download.html or upgrade with "sage -upgrade", as
usual.
This release includes updated spkg's prepared by Robert Bradshaw and
Carl Witty, and patches created by Carl Witty, William Stein, Jaap
Spies, Joel Mohler, Robert Miller, Dav
On 10/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You are totally wrong. A bot with 1000 user accounts has no
> > greater chance to kill another worksheet process, etc.
> > with high probability than a bot with 1 user account.
> > I don't understand what you're thinking.
>
> If there
Hello folks,
Bug Day 5 is now planned for Saturday, November 3rd, 2007. Official
start will be 10am PST, but as usual people from European time zones
or the east coast might start earlier and finish a little sooner.
I you would like to participate add your name to the list at
http://wiki.sagemat
> You are totally wrong. A bot with 1000 user accounts has no
> greater chance to kill another worksheet process, etc.
> with high probability than a bot with 1 user account.
> I don't understand what you're thinking.
If there are 1000 user accounts, and a bot has 1000 web accounts, then either
On 10/28/07, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to numerically solve a system of equations. Currently I have:
> >
> > sage: var('x y p q')
> > sage: eq1 = p+q==9
> > sage: eq2 = q*y+p*x==-6
> > sage: eq3 = q*y^2+p*x^2==
On 10/28/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think the sage server should just have some specific number of limited
> > permission sagexxx accounts, e.g., 1000 of them, and then as new users
> > are created map them to one of those accounts. There will be a hard
> > limit on th
> I think the sage server should just have some specific number of limited
> permission sagexxx accounts, e.g., 1000 of them, and then as new users
> are created map them to one of those accounts. There will be a hard
> limit on the total number of users, of course. I'm basically
> envisioning
On 10/28/07, TrixB4Kidz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just out of curiosity are you listing options like the above since
> > you "want somebody to implement them", or are you listing them because
> > you want to implement one of them, and you want feedback before you
> > choose the one that you w
On Oct 29, 2:22 am, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28 Oct, 20:26, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > OK, so I wasn't trying to suggest that I was the first to have got as
> > far but every little helps, and if Johannes remembers to ask
> > Christoph then he may be sp
On 28 Oct, 20:26, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, so I wasn't trying to suggest that I was the first to have got as
> far but every little helps, and if Johannes remembers to ask
> Christoph then he may be sprred into action.
>
> As for physically GPL-ing the code, here's wh
On 10/28/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Py_ssize_t should *never* be used if you really mean to use an
> > int. But in any situation that you're indexing something, use
> > it. Note that it is not just size_t from C, since it is signed,
> > since in Python list indices can be neg
> Just out of curiosity are you listing options like the above since
> you "want somebody to implement them", or are you listing them because
> you want to implement one of them, and you want feedback before you
> choose the one that you want to implement?
I'd be willing to implement this functio
> > So this is it:
> > Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> > be used for natural sciences/engineering applications etc.?
> > I think that first of all this would mean more users coming to sage.
>
> From my perspective, SAGE has evolved to the point where
William Stein wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What is the correct/recommended use of Py_ssize_t in Cython code?
>
> Py_ssize_t should *never* be used if you really mean to use an
> int. But in any situation that you're indexing something, use
> it. Note that it
Fabio wrote:
> So this is it:
> Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> be used for natural sciences/engineering applications etc.?
> I think that first of all this would mean more users coming to sage.
>From my perspective, SAGE has evolved to the point wh
On 10/27/07, TrixB4Kidz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Excellent. Prohibiting socket access will be easier to implement than
> building the compromise I proposed.
OK. So who wants to explain exactly how to do this using iptables?
> > > > 2. Disallow killing processes by any sageXX account. This
On 10/28/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the correct/recommended use of Py_ssize_t in Cython code?
You should use Py_ssize_t *anywhere* you are indexing into a Python
list, tuple, etc. Py_ssize_t is the official Python 2.5.x type
for indexing into such structures.
Py_ssize_
William Stein wrote:
> On 10/28/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am working on a talk on SAGE for the RHUL PhD seminar and thus I wondered
>> what functionality SAGE implements that was not implemented before in the
>> open-source world. By 'implement' I do not mean wrapping som
On 10/28/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am working on a talk on SAGE for the RHUL PhD seminar and thus I wondered
> what functionality SAGE implements that was not implemented before in the
> open-source world. By 'implement' I do not mean wrapping some libr
On 10/28/07, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am working on a talk on SAGE for the RHUL PhD seminar and thus I wondered
> what functionality SAGE implements that was not implemented before in the
> open-source world. By 'implement' I do not mean wrapping some library or
> using the C
Hi everybody,
I am working on a talk on SAGE for the RHUL PhD seminar and thus I wondered
what functionality SAGE implements that was not implemented before in the
open-source world. By 'implement' I do not mean wrapping some library or
using the CLI of some other CAS/mathematics package. So f
On Oct 28, 1:48 pm, cwitty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can download SAGE 2.8.10.rc1
> fromhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/cwitty/2.8.10/sage-2.8.10.rc1.tar
> .
>
> Hopefully there will be no more changes before the release of 2.8.10,
> which is expected to happen this evening.
Well, th
You can download SAGE 2.8.10.rc1 from
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/cwitty/2.8.10/sage-2.8.10.rc1.tar
.
Hopefully there will be no more changes before the release of 2.8.10,
which is expected to happen this evening.
Carl Witty
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
OK, so I wasn't trying to suggest that I was the first to have got as
far but every little helps, and if Johannes remembers to ask
Christoph then he may be sprred into action.
As for physically GPL-ing the code, here's what I did for mwrank,
where admittedly the source code was not split int
On 10/28/07, Fabio Tonti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm just copy and pasting something which I spoke about with cwitty and
> Martin Albrecht.
>
> So this is it:
> Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
> be used for natural sciences/engineering applications
I'm just copy and pasting something which I spoke about with cwitty and
Martin Albrecht.
So this is it:
Why is there not emphasize on sagemath.org about the fact that sage can also
be used for natural sciences/engineering applications etc.?
I think that first of all this would mean more users comi
Sorry, accidentally hit send before I wrote anything :).
When upgrading to 2.8.9, the upgrade halts with the output
/bin/sed: can't read /home/bob/sage-2.8.7/local/lib/libgmp.la: No such
file or directory
I renamed the directory /home/bob/sage-2.8.7 to /home/bob/sage.
Something in sage -upgrade
login as manage, then do
sudo - su
- William
(Sent from my iPhone.)
On Oct 28, 2007, at 11:44 AM, John Voight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I tried that.
>
> sage login: root
> Password: sage
>
> No dice.
>
> Did this change and I need to acquire a new VMware appliance?
>
> JV
>
>
> >
--
I tried that.
sage login: root
Password: sage
No dice.
Did this change and I need to acquire a new VMware appliance?
JV
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
--
Bobby Moretti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve
Hi John,
If I recall correctly, William Stein already asked Christoph if a
GPL'd version of LiDIA was coming. His posts on the LiDIA list
indicate that Prof. Buchmann has agreed and that as far as he
(Christoph) is concerned, LiDIA is GPL'd. Christoph said he would
produce a GPL'd version of the
On 10/28/07, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I asked JB specifically about GPL'ing LiDIA and he immediately agreed
> saying there was no problem with that as far as he is concerned. He
> said we should approach Christoph Ludwig who is the person currently
> in charge of LiDIA. I guess
Bill's post reminded to me to report on a discussion I had about 10
days ago with Johannes Buchmann.
Buchmann's group created LiDIA about 15 years ago. At the time, the
fact that LiDIA would exist and be a C++ package was what concinved me
to convert all my old programs to C++ (from Algol68 if y
I've been looking at LiDIA again to see how fast the number field
module is. Here are some notes:
* LiDIA does not compile with g++ version 4.1.2 let alone 4.2.2.
* The instructions on the LiDIA list for making it compile are
incomplete and seem to break various bits of the integer factorisation
Hi,
What is the correct/recommended use of Py_ssize_t in Cython code?
In part of the code I see Py_ssize_t as a kind of replacement for int,
while Python PEP 353 speaks about integers used as index.
In trac ticket #973 Michael wrote:
> -/* Return a Py_ssize_t integer from the object item */
> -
We recently became aware of the build-problems on OSX. The fixes are
included in the next release of
CVXOPT (>0.9).
Joachim
On Oct 22, 4:16 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Hamptonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I had the following failure from "make test", fro
On Oct 28, 11:26 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Oct 28, 10:33 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 28, 2007, at 2:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
>
>
> > > On Oct 28, 9:48 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >> O
On 10/26/07, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to numerically solve a system of equations. Currently I have:
>
> sage: var('x y p q')
> sage: eq1 = p+q==9
> sage: eq2 = q*y+p*x==-6
> sage: eq3 = q*y^2+p*x^2==24
> sage: solve([eq1,eq2,eq3,p==1],p,q,x,y)
> [[p == 3, q == 6, x ==
On Oct 28, 10:33 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2007, at 2:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
Hi Robert,
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 28, 9:48 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Oct 28, 2007, at 1:29 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > Hi Robert,
>
> >>> For 2.8.10.alpha
On Oct 28, 2007, at 1:29 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> For 2.8.10.alpha1+Craig's fix and python compiled using "--without-
> pymalloc" I get with the default cleanup level 1:
>
> ==6569== LEAK SUMMARY:
> ==6569==definitely lost: 181,030 bytes in 2,926 blocks.
> ==6569== possibly lost: 266,925 byt
Okay, I got some new results:
Changing permanent() slightly in matrix2.pyx:
print "entering permanent() - m: ",m," n: ",n
from sage.rings.arith import binomial
for r from 1 <= r < m+1:
lst = _choose(n, r)
print "lst", lst
tmp = []
On Oct 28, 2007, at 2:17 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 9:48 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Oct 28, 2007, at 1:29 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>>
>>
>>> For 2.8.10.alpha1+Craig's fix and python compiled using "--without-
>>> pymalloc" I get with the default clea
On Oct 27, 1:26 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2007, at 9:35 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> >>> Carl Witty was also wondering whether your newCython.spkg was ready
> >>> for 2.8.10 or if we should wait.
>
> >> I believe so, it compiles all of SAGE and passes all doctests. S
On Oct 28, 9:48 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Oct 28, 2007, at 1:29 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
Hi Robert,
>
>
> > For 2.8.10.alpha1+Craig's fix and python compiled using "--without-
> > pymalloc" I get with the default cleanup level 1:
>
> > ==6569== LEAK SUMMARY:
> > ==6569==
48 matches
Mail list logo
