[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think William should decide soon if Bug Day 2 will be moved up a day > to Thursday. it looks very likely to happen, so please let us know and > update the Wiki page. Nodoby was against it, so SAGE Bug Day 2 will be this coming *Thursday*, from

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-01 Thread Bill Hart
Cool. Can I ask what if any profiles have been done of algebraic number theory functions yet in Magma and other packages? It might be interesting to look at LiDIA in the roundup too. I understand a fair bit of effort went into that in the ANT area. Since it is definitely an issue which interests

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread mabshoff
I think William should decide soon if Bug Day 2 will be moved up a day to Thursday. it looks very likely to happen, so please let us know and update the Wiki page. One more update remark on memleaks: William suspected a leak in "a=ModularSymbols(n,sign=1).decomposition()" related to linear algeb

[sage-devel] missing dictionary deallocation in Cython's init code

2007-09-01 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, this is something I came across earlier this week, but I only found time today to analyze and write down my understanding. I hope that Robert Bradshaw has some time to look into this. It is not critical because the amount of memory not deallocated is a) constant and b) compared to th

[sage-devel] Re: [Aldor-l] Aldor source code release!

2007-09-01 Thread Gregory Vanuxem
Many thanks. Greg Le samedi 01 septembre 2007 à 14:39 -0400, Bill Page a écrit : > Dear Aldor and Axiom developers and users; > > I would like to congratulate Stephen Watt and the team at aldor.org > for achieving their goal of releasing Aldor in source code form as > planned! > > See: http://

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't recall if I mentioned the following things related to > performance already, apologies if I did, and apologies if some of it > is out-of-date information to the SAGE group who've already been > working on this: > > 1) I'm told Magma uses so

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-01 Thread Bill Hart
I can't recall if I mentioned the following things related to performance already, apologies if I did, and apologies if some of it is out-of-date information to the SAGE group who've already been working on this: 1) I'm told Magma uses some version of Kash/Kant for algebraic number theory, or at

[sage-devel] Aldor source code release!

2007-09-01 Thread Bill Page
Dear Aldor and Axiom developers and users; I would like to congratulate Stephen Watt and the team at aldor.org for achieving their goal of releasing Aldor in source code form as planned! See: http://www.aldor.org --- Source Release Aldor sources are now available for non-commercial purpos

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In that case, what is the right way to "notify" that a patch has been > > attached? I guess what I'm saying is: how does the main repository > > maintainer know where to look for tickets that are probably ready to > > be closed? Is that manage

[sage-devel] Re: number fields

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
This conversation was off-list, but should be on-list, so I'm pushing it there. Forwarded Conversation Subject: number fields From: William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joel B. Mohler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECT

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread Martin Albrecht
> QUESTION: Would this be a major inconvenience for anybody? Fine for me. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~-~--~~~---~--

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 1, 7:13 pm, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:08 PM, William Stein wrote: > > > > > > > On 9/1/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sep 1, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe sol

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 1, 6:43 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - all info about Bug Day 2 can be found athttp://www.sagemath.org:9001/bug2 > > including info about joining #sage-devel on IRC. > > > - I will particiapate and concentrate on mem

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread David Harvey
On Sep 1, 2007, at 1:08 PM, William Stein wrote: > > On 9/1/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sep 1, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe solves the issue. Do I close the ticket at that point myself? Or should t

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 1, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > >> Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe solves the > >> issue. Do I close the ticket at that point myself? Or should the > >> ticket only be closed by the person who puts the

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread David Harvey
On Sep 1, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe solves the >> issue. Do I close the ticket at that point myself? Or should the >> ticket only be closed by the person who puts the patch into the >> "main" repository? >> >> david > > I t

[sage-devel] Re: question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sep 1, 2007, at 9:57 AM, David Harvey wrote: > > Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe solves the > issue. Do I close the ticket at that point myself? Or should the > ticket only be closed by the person who puts the patch into the > "main" repository? > > david I think there s

[sage-devel] question about trac workflow

2007-09-01 Thread David Harvey
Suppose I attach a patch to a ticket, which I believe solves the issue. Do I close the ticket at that point myself? Or should the ticket only be closed by the person who puts the patch into the "main" repository? david --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - all info about Bug Day 2 can be found at http://www.sagemath.org:9001/bug2 > including info about joining #sage-devel on IRC. > > - I will particiapate and concentrate on memory leaks and packaging > issues (mostly on Solaris). I did add that info

[sage-devel] Re: vpython package (boost unicode problem)

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William, > > I noticed that the Python that comes with SAGE-2.8.3 > still has UCS2. > > Are you still considering changing to UCS4? I forgot about all that so I've made this trac ticket #551: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/551 I

[sage-devel] trac.sagemath.org crashing

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
Hi, Since we've started making much heavier use of trac.sagemath.org, it's crashed the trac server 4 times now. Each time the log says "Segmentation Fault" and trac stops. So I've switched from a trac (and all dependencies) that I built myself to the standard system-wide Ubuntu 6.10 trac. Hopef

[sage-devel] Re: creating a .deb for SAGE

2007-09-01 Thread William Stein
On 9/1/07, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I noticed some interest in creating a .deb for SAGE on irc today. A > > lot of work was > > put into this recently. The results are here: > > > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/georgesk/development/sage/ > > > > I hope somebody wi

[sage-devel] Re: creating a .deb for SAGE

2007-09-01 Thread Ondrej Certik
> I noticed some interest in creating a .deb for SAGE on irc today. A > lot of work was > put into this recently. The results are here: > > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/georgesk/development/sage/ > > I hope somebody will take up the effort and put more work into this. I wanted to lo

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Sage's Bug Day 2 announcement/ideas

2007-09-01 Thread mabshoff
On Sep 1, 3:32 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (This is really from Michael Abshoff.) > > Hello folks, > > Sage's Bug Day 2 is almost upon us -- It will happen on Friday September 7th, > 2007. We usually start about 10am pacific standard time, but feel free > to drop by the IRC