On Apr 23, 11:44 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One could run the notebook from any directory ever since the
> notebook was first released.
Well you could... but you would get import errors. I had a problem
like this last year:
http://osdir.com/ml/mathematics.sage.general/2006-1
On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I've noticed 2 problems with tne notebook:
These are both design decisions rather than bugs.
> -- When running sage in notebook mode from a directory other than
> SAGE_ROOT (btw, I'm glad I can finally do this),
One could r
It also builds fine for me under Ubuntu Edgy Eft, on an Intel Core Duo.
Like others have reported, the only doctest failures seem to be in
multi_polynomial_libsingular.pyx.
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 02:35 -0700, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a preliminary SAGE-2.5.alpha0 tarball here:
It is set in notebook.py and used in worksheet.py
On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 23, 9:48 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is
> > notebook('gap', system='gap')
> > what you are looking
On Apr 23, 9:48 pm, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is
> notebook('gap', system='gap')
> what you are looking for?
No, just looking for the code that makes it all possible :)
didier
--~--~-~--~~~-
On 4/23/07, didier deshommes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I've noticed 2 problems with tne notebook:
...
>
> -- When running SAGE from $SAGE_ROOT, every time I create a new
> worksheet, it is created in "GAP mode" (a new feature in 2.4.2, I
> think). This does not happen when I run
Hi there,
I've noticed 2 problems with tne notebook:
-- When running sage in notebook mode from a directory other than
SAGE_ROOT (btw, I'm glad I can finally do this), SAGE reads/writes my
worksheets in $CURR_DIR/sage_notebook.
For example, iI'm running SAGE from:
{{{
/home/dfdeshom/custom/sage/de
On Apr 23, 8:56 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, at the end of the make process, I tried to type:
>
> > install_scripts ( '/scratch' )
>
> > using the syntax it recommended. It replied:
>
> You have to type it in SAGE not on the bash command line. I'll clarify
> this in
On 4/23/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I re-ran the tests and the same error recurred (but with a different
> numbered temp directory of course). I checked in the sage temp
> directory and there seemed to be two numbered temp directories in
> there, one of which did not change, the oth
William Stein wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Seems to build fine in 40 minutes on a dual core Pentium-D 32 bit 3.2
>> GHz with Fedora Core (no idea what version - if someone tells me how
>> to check, I will).
>
> No clue. Thanks.
>
uname -a
returns the name of th
I re-ran the tests and the same error recurred (but with a different
numbered temp directory of course). I checked in the sage temp
directory and there seemed to be two numbered temp directories in
there, one of which did not change, the other of which seemed to
change with the doctest being run.
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a preliminary SAGE-2.5.alpha0 tarball here:
>
> /home/was/sage2.5
>
Linux paix.jaapspies.nl 2.6.20-1.2307.fc5smp #1 SMP Sun Mar 18 21:02:16 EDT
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
real74m15.263s
user60m38.879s
sys 9m37.326s
To install gap, g
On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:21 , Bobby Moretti wrote:
> In terms of features, something comparable to Apple's grapher
> application
> would be nice. Specifically, if you give, say, a polynomial in two
> variables, it should automagically do implicit plotting. I think
> that having
> dead simple i
On 4/23/07, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems to build fine in 40 minutes on a dual core Pentium-D 32 bit 3.2
> GHz with Fedora Core (no idea what version - if someone tells me how
> to check, I will).
No clue. Thanks.
> There were plenty of compiler warnings including ones about var
Hello,
uncommenting line 306 & 307 in Makefile.in fixes it for me:
#sqlite3.c: target_source $(TOP)/tool/mksqlite3c.tcl
# tclsh $(TOP)/tool/mksqlite3c.tcl
sqlite has been build successfully, but I am not sure if there will be
problems down the road. Once I am done and run all the test
Seems to build fine in 40 minutes on a dual core Pentium-D 32 bit 3.2
GHz with Fedora Core (no idea what version - if someone tells me how
to check, I will).
There were plenty of compiler warnings including ones about variables
used uninitialised, incorrect C++ compiler directives used and the
li
On 4/23/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This can't always be done in general, and even if it can it's usually
> really ugly. For example, sin(sin(y) + y) = x^5 - x + 1.
>
> There are other algorithms to do this kind of implicit plotting.
Maybe we should enumerate some.For e
This can't always be done in general, and even if it can it's usually
really ugly. For example, sin(sin(y) + y) = x^5 - x + 1.
There are other algorithms to do this kind of implicit plotting.
On Apr 23, 2007, at 11:25 AM, Timothy Clemans wrote:
>
> Do we just create a function based on the eq
On 4/23/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In terms of features, something comparable to Apple's grapher application
> would be nice. Specifically, if you give, say, a polynomial in two
> variables, it should automagically do implicit plotting. I think that having
> dead simple implici
Do we just create a function based on the equation in question or in
the case of the equation of circles two functions and just plot the
function(s)?
On 4/23/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In terms of features, something comparable to Apple's grapher application
> would be nice. S
In terms of features, something comparable to Apple's grapher application
would be nice. Specifically, if you give, say, a polynomial in two
variables, it should automagically do implicit plotting. I think that having
dead simple implicit plotting could be a huge selling point for SAGE.
~Bobby
On
hi all,
Last night I had a beer with Ivan Krstic (one of the OLPC developers),
and he showed me one of their little laptop gizmo thingys. I have to
say I was, on the whole, quite impressed. It has a gorgeous (small)
display. It's pretty slow and the keyboard is fiddly. But I ran the
SAGE note
On 4/23/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the plan to support plotting of equations, especially ones
> like x^2 + y^2 == 1 which is y == +- sqrt(-x^2 + 1) and 6*x + 4*y == 9
> which is y == -6/4*x + 3/2?
I don't have a good plan yet. Thought out suggestions for an implemen
On 4/23/07, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll have to think about it. It's a somewhat tricky problem,
> > possibly involving
> > threads or improving the cleaner process.
>
> I think it might be handy to have some kind of a timeout parameter on
> the cleanup processes (though I'
Hi David,
Thanks for reporting those few minor failures. Those are, in fact,
extremely useful,
since I don't have an amd64 machine running suse, and it's extremely
important that all doctests pass on all known build machines. I've fixed the
corresponding doctests.
Now that you have sage-2.5, y
On Apr 23, 2007, at 7:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On 4/23/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> dortmund.de> wrote:
>> Ok, you can find a copy at http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-
>> dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/
>> - it is PPC only at the moment.
>>
>>>
Sounds good - I am trying to figure out if
Hello,
I also found this. The problem is here:
tclsh ./tool/mksqlite3c.tcl
gcc sqlite3.c -o sqlite3
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/../../../libcygwin.a(libcmain.o):
(.text+0xab):
undefined reference to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
sqlite3.c is build with the script ./tool/mksqlite3c.tcl - then
c
Hi,
The sqlite-3.3.15 package included in the SAGE-2.5 alpha that I posted here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/was/sage2.5
doesn't build under cygwin. So if you try to build the alpha version under
cygwin, you'll have to replace that package by sqlite-3.3.14.spkg from
the previous
ver
On Apr 23, 2007, at 08:34 , Bill Hart wrote:
>
> Also, from what I can tell, there is a version of LiDIA floating about
> which compiles on the latest gcc. Perhaps the one remaining active
> developer, Christoph, has a copy of this.
>
> William and others interested in this issue, can you CC me
OK, here is the information regarding the GPL of LiDIA, taken from the
LiDIA list from the one active developer of LiDIA (apart from Jordi
Gutierrez Hermoso who has been working on the Debian port). Christoph
is no longer at Darmstadt, but at WORMS but is the LiDIA maintainer.
Presumably Buchmann
Also, from what I can tell, there is a version of LiDIA floating about
which compiles on the latest gcc. Perhaps the one remaining active
developer, Christoph, has a copy of this.
William and others interested in this issue, can you CC me on this
topic if there are developments. If nothing happen
According to the mailing list for LiDIA, it was GPL'd last year, but
no one has updated the web page with the new license information. More
precisely, the authors agreed to allow it to be GPL'd last year, but
none of the files contain the GPL preamble, nor is there a copy of the
GPL in the tarball
I looked at LiDIA a long time ago (like 1999 or 2000) and I remember
being very impressed both with its scope and with its modular (i.e.
recursive) data types and programming dogma. However, I decided
against using it simply because of its license. I suspect that other
developers may have made t
It would be very valuable if LiDIA were GPL'd! I re-skimread the
entire 700+ page manual last night.
I'm not certain how many people actually use LiDIA, but my guess is
not that many. And I really don't know why this is. It is very well
documented (if not a little too verbosely, and without suffi
On 4/23/07, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, you can find a copy at
> http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/
> - it is PPC only at the moment.
>
> >
> > > Sounds good - I am trying to figure out if there is a way that the
> > > notebook can tell the server to terminate
On Monday 23 April 2007 11:35, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've posted a preliminary SAGE-2.5.alpha0 tarball here:
>
> /home/was/sage2.5
>
> I'm uploading it now -- it's 93 MB, and I'm uploading it as I write this
> email. I don't know for certain that it builds, though hopefully it will
> bo
On Apr 23, 4:29 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The compressed dmg is ~137MB, I will post a link once I am at the
> > office.
>
> That's reasonable.
Ok, you can find a copy at
http://fsmath.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/~mabshoff/sage/
- it is PPC only at the moment.
>
> > S
Hi,
I've posted a preliminary SAGE-2.5.alpha0 tarball here:
/home/was/sage2.5
I'm uploading it now -- it's 93 MB, and I'm uploading it as I write this email.
I don't know for certain that it builds, though hopefully it will both build
and pass all doctests -- reports are welcome. Especially i
38 matches
Mail list logo
