On 4/23/07, Bobby Moretti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In terms of features, something comparable to Apple's grapher application > would be nice. Specifically, if you give, say, a polynomial in two > variables, it should automagically do implicit plotting. I think that having > dead simple implicit plotting could be a huge selling point for SAGE.
OK, I agree with how the interface would work. I'm more interested in an actual implementation plan. I.e., what code can we barrow, what algorithms, etc... > > ~Bobby > > On 4/23/07, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 4/23/07, Timothy Clemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > What is the plan to support plotting of equations, especially ones > > > like x^2 + y^2 == 1 which is y == +- sqrt(-x^2 + 1) and 6*x + 4*y == 9 > > > which is y == -6/4*x + 3/2? > > > > I don't have a good plan yet. Thought out suggestions for an > implementation > > strategy are welcome. Please email the list. This will be after > > sage-2.5 is released though. > > > > William > > > > > > > > > > > -- William Stein Associate Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://www.williamstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
