On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:18:00 -0800, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On February 10, 2007 1:10 AM William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Use "sage -upgrade" not "sage -update".
>>
>
> Yes, sorry, that was a typo. I *did* use
>
> sage -upgrade
Your download must have been corrupted or something. Del
On February 10, 2007 1:10 AM William Stein wrote:
>
> Use "sage -upgrade" not "sage -update".
>
Yes, sorry, that was a typo. I *did* use
sage -upgrade
( 'sage -update' gives an error message now.)
>
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:53:38 -0700, Bill Page
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Wh
Use "sage -upgrade" not "sage -update".
William
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 22:53:38 -0700, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While trying to update by sage-2.0 installation on SuSE 10.2
> I received the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage-2.0> ./sage -update
> ...
> sage-2.1.0.1/.hg/d
While trying to update by sage-2.0 installation on SuSE 10.2
I received the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/sage-2.0> ./sage -update
...
sage-2.1.0.1/.hg/data/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_rational_fie1d.py.1
Sage-2.1.0.1/.hg/data/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/formal_group.py.1
Finished ex
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:13:53 -0700, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An issue forming quotient rings -- ordering matters:
>
> sage: R. = ZZ['t']
>
> sage: R.quo(ideal(t, 3))
> Quotient of Univariate Polynomial Ring in t over Integer Ring by the
> ideal (3, t)
>
> sage: R.quo(ideal(3,
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:18:16 -0700, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BTW that ell_rational_field.py is getting kind of ridiculously big.
Indeed! It desparately needs to be broken up. I think the best way is to do
this:
class EllipticCurve_rationals_0(...): # name may change
An issue forming quotient rings -- ordering matters:
sage: R. = ZZ['t']
sage: R.quo(ideal(t, 3))
Quotient of Univariate Polynomial Ring in t over Integer Ring by the
ideal (3, t)
sage: R.quo(ideal(3, t))
---
T
On Friday 09 February 2007 09:00, Jaap Spies wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
> > Anyways, let me know what ldd tells you.
> >
> >
> >
> > -- William
> ldd
> /home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/matrix
>/matrix_modn_dense.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00ebf000)
>
Hello,
sorry to not get back to you sooner, but I was rather busy with
CoCoALib stuff today.
On Feb 9, 1:56 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the question is "are there applications of Grobner bases over ZZ?"
> then the answer I believe is yes. George Nakos, a colleague 2 doors
William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:57:10 -0700, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> These sort of problems should never happen if you haven't changed the
>>> contents of devel/sage/sage-main.
>>>
>> If I changed a comma or a dot in one or more files, this means I cannot
>> upgra
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:57:10 -0700, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Somehow your SAGE library code didn't get fully updated, e.g., there
>> might have been a conflict that prevented Mercurial from merging it in.
>> If you *don't* have anything important in
>> SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/
William Stein wrote:
>
> Somehow your SAGE library code didn't get fully updated, e.g., there
> might have been a conflict that prevented Mercurial from merging it in.
> If you *don't* have anything important in
> SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage-main
> you can just rebuild the SAGE library easil
William Stein wrote:
> Anyways, let me know what ldd tells you.
>
>
>
> -- William
>
>
ldd
/home/jaap/downloads/sage-2.1/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages/sage/matrix/matrix_modn_dense.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00ebf000)
libntl.so => not found
libgmp.so.3 => /
William Stein wrote:
>
> Somehow your SAGE library code didn't get fully updated, e.g., there
> might have been a conflict that prevented Mercurial from merging it in.
> If you *don't* have anything important in
> SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage-main
> you can just rebuild the SAGE library easily
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 09:41:44 -0700, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> Your error is related to building linbox, but I've never seen it on any of
>> them many systems I tested on, so I don't know how to fix it. (Building
>> linbox on a range of machines is really d
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 07:39:49 -0700, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
>
> This is what happens on FC 5 upgrading 1.9 --> 2.1
Somehow your SAGE library code didn't get fully updated, e.g., there
might have been
Shouldn't there be a notice on the download page that there a build
problem with FC5.
On 2/9/07, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
> > I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
>
> Upgrading on Cygwin from 2.0 --> 2.1 worked fine.
>
> Jaap
>
>
>
> >
>
-
William Stein wrote:
> I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
Upgrading on Cygwin from 2.0 --> 2.1 worked fine.
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send emai
William Stein wrote:
> I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
This is what happens on FC 5 hg_sage.pull() in 2.0
and doing sage -br
Jaap
[... snipped]
sage/matrix/matrix_integer_dense_linbox.cpp:41: error: spy was not declared
in this scope
sage/matrix/matrix_i
William Stein wrote:
> I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
This is what happens on FC 5 upgrading 1.9 --> 2.1
Jaap
--
All tests passed!
Total time for all tests: 876.6 seconds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
William Stein wrote:
> I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release.
This is what happens on FC 5
Jaap
SAGE build/upgrade complete!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-2.1]$ ./sage
--
| SAGE Version 2.1, Release Date
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 02:38:07 -0700, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> changeset: 2777:eebf017d258d
>> user:William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> date:Tue Feb 06 00:06:14 2007 -0700
>> summary: merge in quad
On Feb 9, 2007, at 1:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
> changeset: 2777:eebf017d258d
> user:William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date:Tue Feb 06 00:06:14 2007 -0700
> summary: merge in quad double code.
What exactly was the resolution on quad-double vs. mpfr?
--~--~-~--
Hello,
I've released SAGE-2.1. It's a nontrivial release. In addition to much new
code
that people sent me, SAGE-2.1 now includes:
* parallel IPython1
* linbox
* quaddouble
High-level change log:
2.1: * william stein -- elliptic curve p-adic L-functions
* did
24 matches
Mail list logo
