[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread David Kohel
Hi, The mploc might require further development to be stable in odd characteristics, but at least aims to be a standard p-adic C library. I am very interested in seeing p-adics developed, so please CC me: David R. Kohel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and my student: Hamish Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with

[sage-devel] sage's save() command

2007-01-25 Thread Yi Qiang
Hey William, I implemented saving of distributed jobs. You can do this now: In [1]: r = DistributedPOVRay(DSage(), 'checkitout', '/Users/yi/ povray/out.pov', 20, W=1024, H=768, A=0.01) In [2]: r.start() In [3]: r.save() Out[3]: 'checkitout.sobj' Come back a few days later... In [1]: r = lo

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:59:17 -0800, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I didn't know that the code in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/rings/padics > was actually working. I'll take a look at it and see if I can just > incorporate actual source into that framework. I thought I had emailed you.

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread David Roe
It looks like you fixed the import statements at the top of padic_ring and padic_ring_element. If that's the case, I can change the source code in those files and things will be okay, correct? Once the padic_ring code is generally working I can try to add padic field code. David On Jan 25, 5:59

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread David Roe
I didn't know that the code in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/rings/padics was actually working. I'll take a look at it and see if I can just incorporate actual source into that framework. David On Jan 25, 5:22 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:15:07 -0800, David

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:15:07 -0800, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > They implement a somewhat modified version of the interfaces in the > folder. The folder also includes other classes that we haven't written > yet. Did you start with the code in SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/rings/padics

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread David Roe
They implement a somewhat modified version of the interfaces in the folder. The folder also includes other classes that we haven't written yet. David On Jan 25, 4:12 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:03:39 -0800, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > He

[sage-devel] Re: p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:03:39 -0800, David Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey all, > Genya and I have code for p-adic ring and field classes and are > currently debugging and writing documentation. If you're interested > I've posted the four files at > sage.math.washington.edu/home/roed/padic

[sage-devel] p-adics

2007-01-25 Thread David Roe
Hey all, Genya and I have code for p-adic ring and field classes and are currently debugging and writing documentation. If you're interested I've posted the four files at sage.math.washington.edu/home/roed/padics07 I've been running into some trouble figuring out how to change everything I need

[sage-devel] Re: [Fwd: [Maxima] suboptimal versus non sense]

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 11:03:39 -0800, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do you follow the discussions on the Maxima mailing list? Thanks. I don't follow that list so thanks for the forward. That said, I think it's perfectly fine if Maxima is aimed at researchers and not beginning students.

[sage-devel] [Fwd: [Maxima] suboptimal versus non sense]

2007-01-25 Thread Jaap Spies
Do you follow the discussions on the Maxima mailing list? Jaap Original Message Subject: [Maxima] suboptimal versus non sense Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:12:10 + (UTC) From: miguel Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] R. Dodiet said: Miguel, I agree that some a

[sage-devel] Re: SD3 room sharing wanted

2007-01-25 Thread Iftikhar Burhanuddin
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Yi Qiang wrote: > I am looking for someone to room share with from 02/16/07 to 02/18/07 > for SD3. If you are going to be going for only the weekend and want > to split a room, please email me. I've added your name here. http://sage.math.washington.edu:9001/days3/roommates

[sage-devel] SD3 room sharing wanted

2007-01-25 Thread Yi Qiang
Hi, I am looking for someone to room share with from 02/16/07 to 02/18/07 for SD3. If you are going to be going for only the weekend and want to split a room, please email me. Yi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googleg

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with givaro finite fields with specified modulus

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:30:58 -0800, Martin Albrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 24 January 2007 20:30, Nick Alexander wrote: >> It worries me that the outputs live in different rings for different >> classes, and the latter is not even a field :) > > Fixed in attachment. I couldn't

[sage-devel] Re: Build error in matrix_integer_dense.pyx

2007-01-25 Thread William Stein
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:03:02 -0800, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Awesome. Not only is my confusion cleared, but the option that was > causing it no longer exists... Yep. This confused everybody! The code to do it is still in the script SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-sage, but it's

[sage-devel] Re: Benchmark

2007-01-25 Thread Bill Hart
Some code for doing this was contributed to FLINT a while back. It will be fast, when we eventually get it incorporated properly in FLINT. It's been sitting in my inbox for some time and isn't even in the svn repository for FLINT yet. I don't have benchmarks to give at present, but I'll let you kn

[sage-devel] Re: Problem with givaro finite fields with specified modulus

2007-01-25 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 20:30, Nick Alexander wrote: > It worries me that the outputs live in different rings for different > classes, and the latter is not even a field :) Fixed in attachment. I couldn't find any bugtracker ticket for this bug, isn't there any? sage: x = ZZ['x'].0 sage: K

[sage-devel] Re: Build error in matrix_integer_dense.pyx

2007-01-25 Thread Robert Miller
Awesome. Not only is my confusion cleared, but the option that was causing it no longer exists... On Jan 24, 11:45 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think it's a distinction between packages (optional or otherwise) > and the core sage library (found in devel/sage/...). The latter