[rtgwg] IETF 122 RTGWG draft agenda posted

Hi, Draft agenda posted: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-122-rtgwg/ Please let me know if we missed anything or you have any questions. Presenters, please email your slides to rtgwg-cha...@ietf.org or upload to the meeting materials ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/122/session/rtgw

[rtgwg] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-lj-rtgwg-sat-routing-consideration-00.txt

Hi All, We have submitted the draft to talk about the motivations, problems, challenges and consideration of the satellite network and routing issues. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lj-rtgwg-sat-routing-consideration/ Hope any of you could be interested in this topic and review it, we

[rtgwg] Re: A question about VRRPv3

Hi Sasha, > On Mar 6, 2025, at 8:41 AM, Alexander Vainshtein > wrote: > > Hi, > I have a question regarding behavior of VRRP in the scenario when the same > VRID is used to provide protection to hosts on two different subnets. > Please consider the following situation: > • The same VRID

[rtgwg] [Errata Verified] RFC9568 (8300)

The following errata report has been verified for RFC9568, "Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8300 -- Stat

[rtgwg] Re: Errata 8002 for RFC 8678

Hi John, Thanks for bringing this to the WG's attention. As a WG member, I support your proposed resolution of the erratum. As RTGWG co-chair, I will continue to track this issue in case there are any objections or intestines in updating the RFC in the future. Thanks, Yingzhen On Thu, Mar 6, 2

[rtgwg] Re: IETF VRRP YANG Model with Inclusive Language - Proposal to Fix in Single Revision

Adding YANG doctors... Summary: I'm attempting to improve the pathetic IETF YANG model velocity by fixing non-inclusive the ietf-vrrp.yang model in one RFC (remove) rather than three (deprecate->obsolete->remove). While some of the removals don't make the restrictive RFC 7950 backward compat

[rtgwg] A question about VRRPv3

Hi, I have a question regarding behavior of VRRP in the scenario when the same VRID is used to provide protection to hosts on two different subnets. Please consider the following situation: 1. The same VRID (e.g., 1) is configured on two IP-capable interfaces later referred to as IF-1 and IF

[rtgwg] Re: Errata 8002 for RFC 8678

Hi Alexander, all, I propose to verify this erratum as “hold for document update”. It doesn’t perfectly fit the guidance for any of the categories, but that seems like the closest to me. The erratum will still show up for anyone who looks at the errata for the RFC, which seems like it addresses