Hi!
As I commonly spell --inplace as --in-place, I'd like to suggest this
simple patch:
commit 5689f99b702788044a45e13582559832cf986328
Author: Jan-Benedict Glaw
Date: Wed Jun 26 22:49:31 2019 +0200
Allow "--in-place" as an alternative option name for "--inp
not consistent and breaking my script, if I want
to restore my files.
I have tons of debugging for this, if required I can send this on the list,
but I think this small description might cover it as well.
Can anybody say something usefull about it ?
Regards,
Jan
--
Please use reply-all for
Hi all,
After some googling I found this message regarding the merged
--copy-devices and --write-devices patch dubbed rw-devices.diff:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2010-January/024538.html
Unfortunately it seems the patch has not been included in the
rsync-patches and has become a bit out
lly,
the No File Security^W^W^WNetwork File System's server reject access
by UID=0 (= root) from a client. (It may explicitely be allowed by
something oftenly called "no_root_squash".)
Other than that, I guess you'll have so strace and tcpdump all
involved parts to see wh
causing this, like a firewall
dropping a too old connection or something like that. Thus, I'd
suggest to also do a tcpdump -i ethX -n -s0 -w rsync.pcap -C 5 port rsync
This should rotate the pcap files after ~ 5MB, only the very last one
(from client as well as from server) are really inter
On Sun, 2011-03-13 21:30:58 +, Adnane RABIH wrote:
> Le 13/03/2011 18:10, Jan-Benedict Glaw a écrit :
> >On Sun, 2011-03-13 16:10:12 +, Adnane RABIH
> >wrote:
> >>I made a script to backup a folder on a remote server it works
> >>manually, I set a cron
set there.)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/faqs/questions.html
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting
With rsync 3.0.7 I have exactly the same problem.
I am using rSync to sync my Userdirectory to another Mac in a home network.
I am not 100% sure, but the problem occurred after the latest update of the
MacOS (Mac OS X 10.6.3 (10D573)) of the Source.
My macmini (the Dest of rSync) is also runnin
Jamie Lokier kirjoitti:
Jan Wagner wrote:
Hi, has anyone of the devels considered adding UDT4 fast reliable udp
transport to socket.c, as a user-selectable alternative to using default
slow TCP?
It could give a 4 to 10-fold throughput improvement to rsync speed over
wide area networks
or normal socket ops. API:
http://udt.sourceforge.net/udt4/index.htm
Just a thought. Has anyone considered it before? Intention is not to
replace or enhance the ssh/rsh "--rsh=..." option but the connection to
a remote rsync daemon.
- Jan
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to a
somehow the same as when rsync tries to send data with SSH
and it has to wait because it is exceeding the bwlimit variable.
The next step for me would be to dive into the rsync code, which is
something I really try to avoid at this moment.
Any volunteers ?
Regards,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk b
150KB/s or higher the SSH load goes up to
70% and rsync to 30% fully consuming my CPU.
I think the problem is pretty clear now. Does anybody have an idea, what the
next step could be to the resolution of this ?
Regards,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jan Alphenaar [mailto:jan.alphen
that this is caused by the cygwin layer.
I will mention this in the cygwin list.
Still, if anybody has any ideas how to solve the issue below, please let me
know.
Warm regards,
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jan Alphenaar [mailto:jan.alphen...@dotcolour.com]
Verzonden: dinsdag 16
retransmitted ? I will do a quick test tonight with rsync/ssh between two
linux boxes (without cygwin), see what that gives me.
Note that I am using these versions:
Cygwin: 1.7.1-1
ssh: OpenSSH_5.3p1
rsync: 3.0.6
Has anybody seen this before ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Jan
--
Please use reply-all
On Tue, 2009-08-11 10:58:15 +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> 2009/8/11 Jan-Benedict Glaw :
> > On Tue, 2009-08-11 16:14:33 +0800, Ming Gao wrote:
> > > I need to migrate 40T data and 180M files from one storage device to
> > > another
> > > one, both so
like "copy over anything", so it's merely mount both
filesystems and use two `tar' instances with a pipe in between...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: http://perl.plover.com/Ques
That is, there might be something like a
greeting message in non-interactive mode.)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de +49-172-7608481
Signature of: Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf
the second : für einen Fre
data/Test.pst .
Can anybody confirm that this is the default behavior ? If yes, what would
be the reason for spawning an extra child rsync process ?
Any information is appreciated.
Warm regards,
Jan
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or c
System Services, but this system
is compliant
to POSIX.
Previously I was running rsync-2.6.9 on that system and it was working well.
Thanks!
Jan
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:49:38 -0700
> Von: Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Jan Th
On Tue 09 Sep 2008, Jan Thielmann wrote:
>> I'm running rsync-3.0.4 on my UNIX system. I've just updated from
>> rsync-2.6.9.
>> I'm facing a general problem with the execution of files during a transfer
>> process.
>>
>> The situation: 2 Dir
e
#THE FILELIST
#[sender] flist start=0, used=1, low=0, high=0
#[sender] i=0 /u/prak28 dir1 mode=0755 len=288 uid=3007030 gid=0 flags=5
#THE FILELIST END
#send_file_list done
#file list sent
#send_files starting
How can that happen? Anyone some ideas?
Thanks a lot!
Jan
--
GMX Kostenlose Spiele:
wntime.
Live replication--one day I'll play with it again.
Another approach could be a shared device (think nbd) with a
sync-mounted filesystem.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: They that give up essential liberty to
On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:08:32 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 04:18:57PM -0400, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
> > I've done some experimenting locally & narrowed things down. In
> > essense, I'm tripping over subtle chan
ld be to just omit the receiving daemon and
use the NFS protocol instead. Maybe using FUSE these days instead of a
preload lib would also be a nice imprevement...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of: What we do fo
On Sun, 2008-03-30 09:54:26 +0300, Mark, Oren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It there a way to use rsync from windows server, so it will pull data on
> NFS through UNIX rsync server?
Yes, there is.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:04:27 -0400
Erik Jan Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just tripped over this one today.
>
> $ rsync --no-motd rsync://alphageek.dyndns.org/slackware
> rsync: link_stat "." (in slackware) failed: No such file or directory (2)
> rsync
Just tripped over this one today.
$ rsync --no-motd rsync://alphageek.dyndns.org/slackware
rsync: link_stat "." (in slackware) failed: No such file or directory (2)
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(1498)
[receiver=3.0.1pre2]
$ rsync --no-motd rsync://alphageek
Hi Wayne,
Ok, I have modified the command, and it works correctly.
This is what it is now:
rsync -av --link-dest=/data/20080313/ 20080313/ 20080314/
Thanks for your help.
Jan
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Wayne Davison
Verzonden
tes/sec
total size is 659198008 speedup is 5071.14
=== END SNIP ===
The weird thing is (besides the error message) that is works perfectly.
Should I create a bug for this ? Or do I need to change the command syntax ?
Any help is appreciated.
Warm regards,
Jan
--
To unsubscribe
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:15:03 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, this is something I noticed just a little bit ago myself. I've
> fixed the bug and am in the process of releasing pre4 now. Sorry for
> the inconvenience.
pre4 is working fine for me. No worries about the inconve
I upgraded to pre3 a couple hours ago & right now I'm watching my 00:00
backup set absolutely _crawl_. Typically, backups would have been
finished somewhere in the 00:10 to 00:30 range, depending how much data
changed across 6 machines in the past day. As I write this, the 3rd of 6
machines is (hop
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:06:40 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't been able to reproduce the error, but I believe I found its
> cause. Please try the latest CVS version and see if it works.
> Thanks!
Pardon the long delay - had my test rig torn down for other projects.
I
both) instances of the
rsync client/daemon.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of:Don't believe in miracles: Rely on them!
the second :
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
To unsubscribe or cha
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:15:34 -0400
"Matt McCutchen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/15/07, Erik Jan Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > # The second error
> > Invalid file index: -101 (-1 - 0) with iflags 0 [receiver]
> > rsync error: proto
Just a quick heads up to say I'm still getting this (reproducable) error while
doing daily backups:
rsync: generator.c:1872: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void
*)0)' failed.
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe
(32)
rsync error: error in
# The first error
rsync: generator.c:1867: check_for_finished_files: Assertion `flist != ((void
*)0)' failed.
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4092 bytes [receiver]: Broken pipe
(32)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1493)
[receiver=3.0.0pre2]
# Sample
3.0.0pre2: non-recursive remote listing breakage
Looks like pre1's fix broke something else.
I noticed this when listing module/directory contents on servers known
to be running versions 2.5.7 & 2.6.3. Not having (full) access to them,
I replicated the errors using 2 machines on my home lan.
#
It would appear something snuck in that breaks non-recursive remote
listings when talking to a non-3.0.0pre1 version of rsync. The symptom
itself is simple enough to see; rather than displaying member
directories/regular files/symlinks/etc as one would expect, only
non-directories (with the excepti
gt;echo "$i" >> .sent_files
> else
>echo -n "-- File $i transfer failed" | logger
>grep -v "$i" .pending_files > .pending_files_new
Dito.
>mv .pending_files_new .pending_files
> fi;
> f
p?
You're really bad in math, aren't you? :-)
If you used "cp" or "scp" or some other non-differential copying
mechanism, you would have send 33378.82 times the amount of data that
rsync just sent over the wire:
= / ( + )
Or in other words: "The traffic use
On Mon, 2007-06-18 13:59:59 +0200, Fredrik Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/18/07, Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-06-18 12:00:00 +0200, Fredrik Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I am trying to use rsync
nsferred as-is. The target filesystem doesn't allow
for these characters. What filesystem type is it?
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2790 mentions a patch,
http://opencoder.net/iconv.diff , to recode filenames using iconv.
Just search for "rsync iconv", you'll find
On Wed, 2007-04-25 14:28:02 -0400, Robert Denton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good luck getting IIRC to compile. If I recall correctly, it is
> nearly impossible. ;)
Nah, that cannot be all that hard :)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49
r end.
>
> Can you please advise?
You'd use "cvs" to connect to these repositories and check-out a
working copy. Rsync'ing this stuff is reasonable for doing backups,
but not to compile the project. (Of course, you'd setup a local CVS
server to serve the just-downl
12sum). I've at least seen
things like this two times, where a HDD silently replied data from a
bad sector.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of:If it doesn't work, force it.
the second :
Hi,
I'm using rsync to backup my data from my Linux machine (SUSE10.1) and
Windows (XP)
I've mounted a windows share on my linux and I'm trying now to copy files to
the windows with rsync.
The windows share is a NTFS filesystem
It's all working except I have a error on large files.
Th
On Thu, 2006-11-02 09:21:45 +0800, woo robbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/11/1, Jan-Benedict Glaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >On Wed, 2006-11-01 22:01:07 +0800, woo robbin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > I've backed up some files(about 20G,wit
n time: 8631.470 seconds
> File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds
Well, the USB stuff tends to be slow. And untuned filesystems are
that, too. If it's ext3, you'd play with the dir_index flag.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-760848
address belongs to.
Then email their abuse account (usually [EMAIL PROTECTED]) and ask
them for help. If they're unwilling (most probably), go to the
nearest police station with your evidence.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-172-7608481
Signature of:
On Sat, 2006-08-05 19:34:39 -0700, Jeffrey Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on 8/5/06 4:51 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > rsync can be used in conjunction with several transport protocols. In
> > one incarnation, you can tell rsync about a command (sup
ofing won't give an attacker all of your backup)
as well as encrypt all the traffic.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49-172-7608481
Signature of: Träume nicht von Dein Leben: Lebe Deinen Traum!
the second :
signature.asc
Description:
once on the
command line and once from within the script and compare both outputs.
Probably where are missing PATH entries or some other variables
missing.
Oh, the `ltrace' tool should visualize accesses to environment
variables, so its use might be an alternative approach.
MfG, JBG
--
r kerberos-ized situation?
Well, ignoring the protocol-specific extensions, I'd think of some
kind of expect(1) wrapped telnet client to do the login and
command-sending stuff...
Though that's all a crude workaround. Why don't you just use ssh,
which is nicely (via GSSAPI) kerberized
nt call? These are eg.
noted in /etc/fstab (if it's a regularly mounted filesystem on a
unix-like box).
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
für einen
with unknown speed and latency."
Please give us some more hints. One hour over eg. a mobile phone
connection with 9600 Baud (like 1kb/sec) for a dataset which changes
completely would be quite well-working, while one hour with fast disks
over a well-connected site (eg. gigabit internet upstr
possible.
# cat /dev/sda | ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] "cat > /dev/sda"
Of course, change the device name as needed on both sides...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur |
Wayne,
I've been experimenting with the {pre,post}-xfer exec options ever since the
original diff showed up in patches/ - fantastic stuff.
My feature request/change centers around the new RSYNC_ARG# variables. Would it
be possible to make these available as an array (ie: ${RSYNC_ARG[#]}) rather
hortly, what do YOU
> think? Any advices?
That all depends on the usage pattern. So you've got one central rsync
server and a number (how many?) of clients that need to synchronize.
All these do have 2Mbit connectivity, right?
You'd also have to define the way your files change. Do
my_folder
Do you really expect a program implementing the RSYNC protocol to talk
to a machine which has some software running speaking the FTP
protocol?
This won't fly... You need to use a FTP client is a FTP server is
installed.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +
RSYNC_PASSWORD=pass
set CYGWIN=NTEA NTSEC
but it seems not to be working
Thanks in advance,
Jan
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm for more information.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting
a hint that most likely the
> file is appended to, but will still catch most occurances where a file was
> modified.
Option 4: tar over netcat.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf|
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:40:55 -0400
Erik Jan Tromp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:09:01 -0700
> Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have released rsync version 2.6.6.
>
> I just extracted the 2.6.6 source tarball & notic
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 13:09:01 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have released rsync version 2.6.6.
I just extracted the 2.6.6 source tarball & noticed that
patches/pre-post-exec.diff wasn't applied to trunk. Wups?
--
"I really want a license to do just two things: make the code
gt; @@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
[...]
> +/**
> + * Runs the filename converter process. Should be called before filename
> + * conversion begins (actually it's not necessarh, but it keeps the proress
> report
^^^
Typo in commen
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:06:59 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:27:56PM -0500, Evan Harris wrote:
> > Is it possible that this patch might be added to the mainstream
> > release anytime soon?
>
> I was originally against the idea, but have softened my oppo
amba which you need to get
right. Unfortunately, having them wrong at some time and correcting them
can lead to wrongly-displaying filenames. So once you got it right,
you'd better check the filenames to see if they match your
expectation...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTE
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:22:39 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, the crash turned out to be caused by an empty file-list not getting
> its "high" value set correctly. If such an empty list gets passed to
> flist_find(), it would crash. This is not something that normally
> happe
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:03:07 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 05:14:57AM -0400, Erik Jan Tromp wrote:
> > if I remove every possible option except --fuzzy & --link-dest,
> > segfault every time.
>
> I haven't seen that
Continuing with my backup script (see previous post), I've found a small oops
regarding the 'max verbosity' option for rsyncd.conf
In the manpage this option is listed as a module option. Poking through the
source, however, shows that it's parsed as a global option (loadparm.c).
If it's a quest
I've been reworking my backup script & decided to give some of the newer
options a try. It would appear I've found a combination that doesn't play nice.
$ rsync --archive --delete-during --fuzzy --hard-links --numeric-ids
--quiet --sparse --temp-dir /backup/helium/
--link-dest /backup/hydrogen/
On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:22:52 +0200
David Hausheer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to backup files to a remote machine on which I don't have
> root permission, while preserving their uids/gids? I know that only the
> super-user can set the owner and group of a file, so what I am actua
On Wed, 18 May 2005 14:33:33 -0400
greg fenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am looking to move files from one system to another (rather than
> copy).
heya gregf
Assuming you have rsync 2.6.4 or newer available to you, "--remove-sent-files"
is likely what you're after.
Erik
--
"I really wan
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:08:38 -0700
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First up, sorry about the dup'd post.. just me being braindead at that hour.
> It would help to know what rsync was doing with the files when the error
> happened, if all the hard-links for a particular hard-link group ar
The background:
I host one of the unofficial slackware mirrors & push to a high speed
(unlisted) mirror that several other unofficials use for pulls. To save
time/disk/bandwidth I use a custom script to hardlink the trees prior to
pushing the updates to said unlisted mirror.
The commandline (l
The background:
I host one of the unofficial slackware mirrors & push to a high speed
(unlisted) mirror that several other unofficials use for pulls. To save
time/disk/bandwidth I use a custom script to hardlink the trees prior to
pushing the updates to said unlisted mirror.
The commandline (l
glibc development, or you need to nail down one version that
actually "works"...
A different approach would be to use ptrace for sniffing at the syscall
layer, but this is troublesome right after fork() IIRC.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:16:59 -0800
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've released rsync 2.6.4pre4. I believe that this version will be what
> gets released as 2.6.4, hopefully on Wednesday. Please try this out
> and let me know if anything is amiss.
I just noticed an oddity when usi
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:53:01 -0800
Wayne Davison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a result of a 1-character typo in options.c:
> I've checked this in. Thanks for the report!
Wow, talk about fast turnaround. :)
Patched, rebuilt, & tested here. Works like a charm. Keep up the fantastic work.
Synopsis: Prior to the 2.6.4pre versions, issuing 'rsync rsync://host/module/'
behaved effectively as 'ls -l'. I've toyed with various options in an attempt
to get an 'ls -l' style output, but to no avail.
As I have a small handful of scripts that rely on this no-longer-functioning
functionalit
nths' with some being 'write 4 times a day' so rsync should be perfect
> if it can be told right after the file is created. We are installing
> fiber to our building so this might be the perfect combination to come
> up with a five second mirror performance.
I'd defi
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:12:54 +0100
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't find the difference, every file has on both systems the same size,
> I'didn't found
> any hidden files (rsync archive?) or something like that. Has anywone an idee,
> why there is a diffe
to incremental synchronization ?
See manpage :-)
> Is it complicated to add to Rsync an option that would just generate
> checksums/hash values of files so that
> the solution above becomes feasible ?.
No need for that...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED].
you'd need to mmap() it, in
parts (4GB limit on 32bit hardware, which you aren't even allowed to
fully exploit...), which would complicate things, and make it possibly a
lot slower.
MfG, JBG
PS: Thanks to all who wrote code for rsync -- I'm really a happy user!
--
Jan-Benedict G
to
> script that under this OS, any suggestions are welcome.
Well, if you don't know how to do this with .bat files, maybe you'd
start writing a wrapper in C? Though, there are numerous examples how to
do error checking in batch files...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PR
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:21:31 +0200
Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had hoped to use it both for my rotating backups & for my (unofficial)
> > slackware mirror.
>
> Hmmm... For a slackware mirror I expect that it would be fine.
To my eyes, a mirror implies a duplicate fileset indis
I had noticed the --link-by-hash patch a short while back & decided it was time to
experiment with it. Sadly, its behaviour is considerabely different from what I
expected - to the point that I find it unusable in its current form. I had hoped to
use it both for my rotating backups & for my (uno
On Fri, 2004-08-20 16:43:07 -0400, Loukinas, Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Anyone syncing say 18-20gb Oracle dbf files..?
No problem--as long as you don't try to backup hot database files.
Shutdown Oracle first:)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedi
" as a _directory_ name containing thousands of files,
it'll work just fine since "." isn't expanded by the shell interpreter,
but recursively read by rsync itself.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine
l to allow a larger buffer
for argv[]. (For Linux, you'll need to edit
./include/linux/binfmts.h; change MAX_ARG_PAGES to whatever
you like better)
- Try to use xargs, but that may be tricky...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
hat rejects an unknown access? Try
"iptables-save" or "ipchains-save" to see if there are any rules
installed (pay attention to default action, too!)...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Frei
r
than 10min (= 600sec).
> Can you help me on this???
I think it's just a performance problem to gather all neded information
in 10min. Try setting a higher timeout (like 7200sec = 2h) and have a
testdrive.
MfG, JBG
PS: With 16MB, you'd probably always run into timeout because of
consta
ce then, we had 2 errors out of 3 backup runs. The error
That's quite little RAM for 8 CPUs.
SCNR, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat vol
the file "this_file_should_be_empty" contains *anything*, you'd look
at your scripts and comment those outputting commands.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Kri
-z is only wise if you've
got a slow link in between and fast CPUs. Omit it if you're in LAN with
not-that-fast CPUs.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer
V6ONLY exists in 2.4.21 upwards, I think
that's not a major problem. Hey, these kernels do have known root
exploits, so it's time for an update!
So if there's a but, don't hide it, but work towards fixing it.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-1
option is useful when rsyncing a large amount
Okay, nice thing. What about
$ echo "killall rsync" | at midnight
Of couse, you can make that a bit more flexible if you've got several
concurrent rsync running (by using their PID and checking it before
killing it to actually be a rsyn
Oops :)
-- quote --
$ rsync -aHPv rsync://host/module/single.file .
receiving file list ...
1 file to consider
Segmentation fault
-- endquote --
The rsync process remains running until explicitly 'kill'ed. At which point, the
following is printed:
-- quote --
rsync error: received SIGUSR1 or
he output.
Long-term solution is more like patching rsync to use stderr, though...
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger
--many-options-here 2>&1 | grep ' is uptodate$' > /dev/null 2>&1 ||
./your_script.sh
Of yourse, fi
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
f
what you told it to do. Allow 22/tcp to host
myweb.com.
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]. +49-172-7608481
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf| Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg
fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
