On Thu, 2005-08-18 04:45:21 -0500, Evan Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any way to disable the checksum block search in rsync, or to > somehow optimize it for systems that are processor-bound in addition to > being network bound?
By design, rsync trades CPU power for bandwidth. > Option 4: Add an option, maybe --optimize-cpu, or --weak-checksums that > would tell rsync to only use weak checksums up until the point in the file > where the weak checksums first differ, and then fallback to the normal weak > and strong checksums from there on. This is a hint that most likely the > file is appended to, but will still catch most occurances where a file was > modified. Option 4: tar over netcat. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
