On Sat, 2006-05-13 20:27:03 +0200, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri 12 May 2006, Matt McCutchen wrote: > > Wayne beat me to it. But I was going to say, you might be able to write > > a wrapper script that sends the rsync command and arguments down the > > telnet connection for the shell to execute and discards any extra output > > produced by the shell while logging in (to avoid the mystifying "is your > > shell clean?" message). For instance, if you know the shell on the > > Don't forget also that there is actually such a thing as a telnet > protocol, so a telnet session probably won't give you a real clean > connection, some combination of special bytes may trigger telnet to do > unexpected things instead of passing the data on transparently. > > Is there no way of using rsh in your kerberos-ized situation?
Well, ignoring the protocol-specific extensions, I'd think of some kind of expect(1) wrapped telnet client to do the login and command-sending stuff... Though that's all a crude workaround. Why don't you just use ssh, which is nicely (via GSSAPI) kerberized? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
