On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:04:22AM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:16:43AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > we have several options that accept multiple values from a file
> > and we aren't switching to null termination for them but --null is
> > rather unspecific.
>
> Yes, I
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:16:43AM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> we have several options that accept multiple values from a file
> and we aren't switching to null termination for them but --null is
> rather unspecific.
Yes, I had been thinking a bit about that option as well. I think I
would like to
Hi,
I am trying to run rsync on OS X. I have it working but I get
.-dirattr.095021 .-dirattr.095046 files in my destination directory.
Every time I run rsync it creates another file. This is the string that I
am using to run rsync
rsync --progress --stats --rsh=/usr/bin/ssh --recursive --t
jw schultz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:44:58PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> jw schultz wrote:
>>> I'd rather we default modify-window to 1 for windows.
>>
>> But windows != FAT. Even a Linux system *could* be using FAT. What's
>> wrong with the current state of affairs?
>> It's not like th
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:44:58PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> jw schultz wrote:
> > I'd rather we default modify-window to 1 for windows.
>
> But windows != FAT. Even a Linux system *could* be using FAT. What's wrong
> with the current state of affairs?
> It's not like the mailing list (rsync or
Hello,
It would be goog if attached patch will be included in upstream. This
patch adds option --apt-support for rsync and with this option rsync
will print some additiona information about file being transfered. No
program logic changed. Having this option in rsync we can have apt with
rsync meth
Alessandro Riz wrote:
> Hi,
> I've a little problem:
> I don't know if I can use rsync for doing an automatic mirror which
> use ftp protocol?
> I hope that shoul be possible but what?
Rsync uses the rsync protocol. If you have to mirror via ftp, then there are
programs out there, but rsync does n
jw schultz wrote:
> I'd rather we default modify-window to 1 for windows.
But windows != FAT. Even a Linux system *could* be using FAT. What's wrong
with the current state of affairs?
It's not like the mailing list (rsync or cygwin) is flooded with messages
complaining about this.
Max.
--
To un
Hi,
I've a little problem:
I don't know if I can use rsync for doing an automatic mirror which use
ftp protocol?
I hope that shoul be possible but what?
Thanks for reply and sorry for my english!
Alessandro
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Befo
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:12:45PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
> jw schultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >> Would "creating a file in the same dir" be "too invasive"?
> >> Of course this would only solve the problem if one file is
> >> created/tested "per
jw schultz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>> Would "creating a file in the same dir" be "too invasive"?
>> Of course this would only solve the problem if one file is
>> created/tested "per directory"...
>> I guess cygwin HAS a call to examine the mount table
Hello,
how could i resolve following problem
rsync an/existing/directory/with_files ->
remote::directory/with/not/existing/subdirectory
Could rsync create missing directories on the destination side?
Thanks
Wolfgang
Wolfgang Leideck (Serversupport)
ONSYS GmbH
Rheinuferstr. 9 --- D-67061
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 12:09:14PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Max Bowsher wrote:
>
> >Unless someone feels like making a FAT-detection patch, the previous status
> >quo looks to me like the best option.
> >
> Would "creating a file in the same dir" be "too invasive"?
> Of course this would only
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 07:22:00PM -0800, Wayne Davison wrote:
> I've worked up a new release of my --files-from patch. It has the
> following changes from the last release:
>
> New Changes:
>
>
> - You can specify a list of files separated by nulls (instead of
>newlines) if yo
Max Bowsher wrote:
Unless someone feels like making a FAT-detection patch, the previous status
quo looks to me like the best option.
Would "creating a file in the same dir" be "too invasive"?
Of course this would only solve the problem if one file is
created/tested "per directory"...
I guess c
15 matches
Mail list logo