On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 02:44:58PM -0000, Max Bowsher wrote:
> jw schultz wrote:
> > I'd rather we default modify-window to 1 for windows.
>
> But windows != FAT. Even a Linux system *could* be using FAT. What's wrong
> with the current state of affairs?
> It's not like the mailing list (rsync or cygwin) is flooded with messages
> complaining about this.
Sorry, i wasn't quite clear. Also i misremembered cygwin
having a default modify-window = 2 in 2.5.5 (thanks _WIN32).
To be clear, here are my preferences in decending order (#1
being most prefered).
1. modify-window = 0 on all platforms
2. modify-window = 1 on windows
3. clunky, yucky hack i wrote to illustrate what it
would take for Lapo Luchini who started the
whole question
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
